Some Are More Equal Than Others: Judge Rules Male Volleyball Player Can Participate...
DRAG HER! Carol Roth Revisiting Janet Yellen's So-Called 'Greatest Hits' In 1 BRUTAL...
CNN Says Attention Junkie Kaitlan Collins Will Host Her Show and Showboat in...
PURE NIGHTMARE FUEL: We Saw Joy Reid's Latest TikTok Video, So Now You...
CNN Panel Rages After Scott Jennings Debunks Liberal Guest!
ARGLE BARGLE RAR! Angry Staffer Shrieking Over Trump Discharging ELEVENTY BILLION TRANS To...
What DEMOCRAT Mega-Donor Said About Kamala Harris's Political Future Is DEVASTATING ... Fo...
LOL! Just Can't Quit Elon! Mark Cuban Receives the EXACT Sort of Welcome...
Dude. No. David Corn's WARNING About Trump Holding Mexico Accountable for Illegals and...
Our Biggest Black Friday Sale Ever – 74% Off VIP Membership
Just WATCH Scott Jennings' Face as CNN Contributor Rambles About How Elon Musk...
ROFL! James Woods Has Just 1 Word for What Pete Buttigieg's Next Job...
Dogs and Cats Living Together, MASS HYSTERIA! Joy Reid Jumps Every Shark EVER...
SAVAGE! Tom Homan CLOBBERS Denver Mayor By Simply AGREEING With Him on This...
George Takei Asks If He Is Being Throttled on X and the Responses...

Jonathan Chait is disgusted that Rand Paul would 'openly attack democracy' by pointing out that majority rule can be a very bad thing

It’s Monday, and New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait has a bee in his bonnet.

Apparently GOP Sen. Rand Paul put it there:

Advertisement

Chait writes:

One of the edifying side effects of the Trump era has been that, by making democracy the explicit subject of political debate, it has revealed the stark fact many influential conservatives do not believe in it. Mike Lee blurted out last fall that he opposes “rank democracy.” His fellow Republican senator, Rand Paul, tells the New York Times today, “The idea of democracy and majority rule really is what goes against our history and what the country stands for. The Jim Crow laws came out of democracy. That’s what you get when a majority ignores the rights of others.”

The belief system Paul is endorsing contains a few related claims. First, the Founders explicitly and properly rejected majoritarianism. (Their favorite shorthand is “We’re a republic, not a democracy.”) Second, to the extent the current system has shortcomings, they reveal the ignorance of the majority and hence underscore the necessity of limiting democracy. Third, slavery and Jim Crow are the best historical examples of democracy run amok.

The most insidious aspect of the Lee-Paul right-wing belief system is its circularity. The more openly the far right threatens democracy, the more it proves democracy is dangerous, and the more necessary it is to strengthen the right’s claim to minority rule. In a healthy polity, all parties would simply accept the value of democracy and views like this would be disqualifying and scandalous. We’ve reached a point, however, when a Senator can openly attack democracy and it’s just more partisan rhetoric.

Advertisement

Is it an attack on democracy to point out that majority rule can have some very bad consequences?

Rand Paul has never been quiet about this.

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement