Since We ALREADY Know About Swalwell, NOW POLITICO Can Share Deep-Dive They Could've...
SHOCKA! Atlantic 'Journo' Behind HOAX-Y Hit Piece on Kash Patel Has History of...
Joyce Carol Oates: Trump Likely Embarrassed Because His Assassination Attempt ‘Looked So A...
Unhinged Philly Mayor Asks Uber and Lyft How Dare They Tell Her How...
Repugnant Liar Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Bag) Went Overseas to Blast Trump's 'Totalitarian Take...
University Graduate Returning to Turkey, Citing ‘Hostility’ in the US
Spain Plans to Grant Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants
Chicago Public Schools Will Hold Official 'Civic Day of Action’ on May 1...
From Whose Office Could the NYT Have Obtained Classified SCOTUS Memos?
WIRED Reports That Much of MAGA Is Convinced Butler Assassination Attempt Was Staged
ABC News Runs Obama’s Campaign Video for VA Gerrymandering as a News ‘Exclusive’
Harmeet Dhillon Calls BS on The Atlantic's Kash Patel Hit Piece and Predicts...
‘Bring Your Checkbook’: Kash Patel Tells The Atlantic He'll See Them in Court
Here's a Dramatization of 'Ilhan Omar and Her Accountants Discovering the 'Rounding Error'
Bill Maher Should Ask Jimmy Kimmel to Come on So They Can Compare...

Richard Grenell has a couple of objectively good questions after Chris Hayes declares that 'Trump is objectively pro-Covid'

As Twitchy told you, everyone’s favorite tear-stained-sweater-wearing MSNBC Chris Hayes broke the news today that Donald “Trump is objectively pro-Covid”:

Advertisement

Unsurprisingly, a lot of people took issue with Hayes’ proclamation. If it’s “objectively” true, where’s Hayes’ empirical proof? Does Chris Hayes even know what “objectively” means?

And while those are great questions, these questions from Richard Grenell are arguably even more important:

Inquiring minds wanna know.

Chris Hayes is objectively not a trustworthy source for accurate information. Does Twitter care? Does MSNBC?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement