Court Halts Christa Pike’s Execution An Hour Before She Was Due to Die...
The 'Death to America' People in Iran Have Made a US Midterm Election...
Jasmine Crockett Won’t Endorse Talarico — So a Fellow Democrat Told Her to...
Kat Rosenfield Reminds Everyone the Cornell 7 Haven’t Been Proven Guilty — and...
Here's Abdul El-Sayed Getting the Money Out of Politics by Raking It in...
A Manlet and His Girlfriend Busted After Lighting an Abandoned House on Fire...
Flydubai Co-Pilot Stabs Captain Midair — Israeli Passengers Subdue Him Before the Plane...
Stephen Miller Blasts CNN's Propaganda Effort About Children at Immigration Court
No Cash Bail Leaves a Pittsburgh Doctor Dead and a Growing Scandal Over...
The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...
Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right
Rev. Suggests Lazarus Was Gay Because Jesus Called for Him to ‘Come Out’
Rep. LaMonica McIver Is Facing Prison for Touching ICE Officers — She Just...

Richard Grenell has a couple of objectively good questions after Chris Hayes declares that 'Trump is objectively pro-Covid'

As Twitchy told you, everyone’s favorite tear-stained-sweater-wearing MSNBC Chris Hayes broke the news today that Donald “Trump is objectively pro-Covid”:

Advertisement

Unsurprisingly, a lot of people took issue with Hayes’ proclamation. If it’s “objectively” true, where’s Hayes’ empirical proof? Does Chris Hayes even know what “objectively” means?

And while those are great questions, these questions from Richard Grenell are arguably even more important:

Inquiring minds wanna know.

Chris Hayes is objectively not a trustworthy source for accurate information. Does Twitter care? Does MSNBC?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement