Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure censorship is NOT a conservative value. Not even a little bit.
I was under the impression that the troglodytes at The Bulwark were working to protect democracy and conserve conservatism or some other happy horse crap. Then again, that was when they first started their ridiculous rag of drivol and maybe they've finally just decided to embrace who and what they really are.
They've embraced THE SUCK.
Otherwise, I'm at a total loss as to why they'd feature any articles or columns from this broad.
I call her Professor Umbridge.
Recommended
Ahem.
The Bulwark is publishing stories by Nina Jankowicz. pic.twitter.com/CWCAW2at7c
— Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸 (@JerryDunleavy) February 24, 2025
Yowza.
Oh, and how about that headline?
Are they really going to try and push the Russian garbage again? They have learned NOTHING. Surely, even the dolts who read them have figured out screeching about Russia Russia Russia is a losing platform, yes?
Then again, maybe not. Have you seen the people who support and follow The Bulward?
Woof.
— NotYourJewishMom🩷 (@CaffMomREDACTED) February 24, 2025
*cough cough*
I hope she sings it! pic.twitter.com/0whIvLUU9x
— Lili von Shtupp (@LvS_Redux) February 24, 2025
How about no?
If they conserve any more conservatism, there won't be any left for the rest of us! 🤣🙄
— Yer buddy Don (@prayerborne) February 24, 2025
Right? So much conserving of conservatism.
Heh.
Bottom of the barrel: scraped.
— Clete Torres 🇺🇸 🛦🔫 (@CleteTorres) February 24, 2025
Ain't that the truth?
==========================================================================
Related:
As a Reminder, Here's How a Federal Employee Reacted to Pipeline Workers Biden FIRED in 2021 (Watch)
==========================================================================
