Mark Cuban Gripes About High California Taxes Before Endorsing James Talarico in Texas...
NYT Reporter Warns DSA-Dems Want to ‘Take Out Our Entire Constitutional System’ on...
Jasmine Crockett Says the Democrat Party Will Face a Racial Reckoning After Midterm...
'Stop Gaslighting Me!': FL Dem. Senate Nom and Dem Chair Explode in Yelling...
Oh, SHELL No!: Canadian WNBA Team Introduces Non-Binary Turtle Mascot With She/They Pronou...
One Meta Data Center Just Doubled (and Then Some) Teachers’ Pay in a...
Chris Cuomo Says Ossoff’s Natalie Harp Dig Meant Her and Trump Hanging Out...
Melugin Highlights Illegal Who Poured Hot Wax on Kids — Then Schools Cato...
Men Dump Girlfriends Who Defend Lindsay Clancy: 'Not Who You Want Raising Your...
NYT’s 'Honest Mistake' Just Cost It $9.25M After Falsely Tying Innocent Alabama Hooper...
One Mom Tried to Ban Oreos From the Entire Class Lunchbox — and...
JD Vance Reveals Usha’s Sleep Training Approach: Start From the Beginning
Croon-Fed Insanity: Rosie O’Donnell Sings About Trump on Kimmel's Show As Acosta Applauds...
Half-Baked Attack: CNN Shuns Common Recipe Math to Smear HHS RFK, Jr., and...
Jill Biden's Insane Theory Behind Why Biden Might've Lost the Debate

Jabs for Jesus? Twitter reacts to Curtis Chang and his odd theological argument for COVID vaccines

It’s Sunday, so it’s the perfect day for a Twitchy story about one of the odder arguments we’ve seen to try to convince (shame?) Christians to support COVID vaccines. Many … most … Twitter users weren’t buying what looked to be theological acrobatics by Curtis Chang to make a pro-vaccine argument to Christians.

Advertisement

Disclaimer: This editor is not an ‘anti-vaxxer’, has not taken a COVID-19 vaccine, is a Christian, and fears that Curtis might strain something trying to connect all these dots.

Curtis Chang’s argument is that the COVID vaccine is an ‘image’ of Christ’s redemption (Jesus saving us from our sins and the consequences of those sins). Jesus is the vaccine that does the saving in his metaphor, and the vaccinated are the redeemed (originally ‘sick’ in our sins and needing saved). That much might serve as a good illustration for a pastor to teach about Christ’s redemptive work, but as a tool to convince people to take the COVID vaccine? Nah.

Then it got weirder.

Curtis then attempted to relate the origins of the vaccines in abortion (an issue he knows is of concern to many Christians) to the original sin of mankind taught by Christianity.

Suddenly, the vaccines became the unredeemed in the metaphor, with a beginning in original sin.

The logical wheels sort of fell of the bus entirely at this point. It seemed mostly like Chang wanted to introduce the abortion topic he knows Christians feel passionately about to bolster his pro-vaccine pitch, and not necessarily because it was logically consistent. It was a messy attempt to diffuse concerns about fetal stem cell research and turn it into a positive in the story.

Advertisement

Curtis Chang closed his argument with a message to ‘pro-life Christians’ who distrust the COVID vaccine:

‘Please remember that the Christian story is the story of redemption. Every one of us has an origin story in sin. None of us can avoid this. Yet each one of us has had our story reworked by Jesus into new life. That’s what it ultimately means to be pro-life. To be pro-life is to be pro-redemption, and to be pro-redemption, in my view, is being pro-vaccine.’

Nod … nod … okay … nod … wait … huh? … WOW.

That closeout at the end … big yikes. At least he said ‘in my view’.

Yeah, it was sort of like that for many of us.

https://twitter.com/SeanBannion/status/1637288865227751424?s=20

LOL. Well said.

For the record, being ‘pro-life’ means being opposed to abortion, which kills tiny humans in the womb. That’s all. Nothing else. Please stop trying to make it something else to serve other agendas.

This might have been the low point of this doctrinal disaster, and it’s not the first time the David French crew has played the ‘you’re not really pro-life if you’re not pro-vaccine’ card. It’s not a fair or accurate claim.

(Whew! We need to take a moment and breathe deeply. Christian charity and stuff … the struggle is real with this one.)

Many took a pretty hard line on Chang’s message. Is it blasphemy or heresy?

Advertisement

We don’t know, but this is not the way to make your case.

Do Christians sometimes try to use scripture to convince you of some argument they really want to make anyway, even if it ends up looking like three octopuses playing Twister? Yeah, we’re definitely guilty of that. LOL.

LOL! Okay, that’s funny.

We don’t know anything about Curtis Chang, to be fair. Others were skeptical immediately.

Yeah, we cringed when we saw that too.

That’s what we said!

It’s like that.

That’s usually the wise route.

Points awarded to everyone who made it through.

Seriously, pastors, you’ve got to stop this stuff. LOL.

Advertisement

Great point. As we said above, you might use the concept of a vaccine to teach about Christianity. Using the gospel message as a tool to convince people to take a particular vaccine … meh.

Perfectly stated. LOL.

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to save 40%!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos