Think Josh Gerstein Was REKT for His SYG Post Before? You Ain't Seen...
OM-GEE! Joey Jones OWNS Smug 'Radical Centrist' Using Brett Favre to Accuse GOP...
WTAF?! POLITICO'S Josh Gerstein Under FIRE for Implying Somalis Could Shoot Amateurs Inves...
FBI Releases New Covenant School Killer's Reason for Killing Six Christians and DUH
LOL! You Got BODIED, Son! Harmeet K. Dhillon ENDS Adam Kinzinger After He...
OOPS! MN State Official Claims Quality 'Learing' Center Closed Down Last Week, There's...
QUIET Piggy! Jessica Tarlov Posts Dumbest Take YET In Paranoid Rant About Nick...
Tim Walz's Horrible, Terrible, No GOOD, Week Gets Worse When DAMNING 2018 Somali-Fraud...
More Minnesota Malfeasance: Amy Klobuchar Faces Federal Lawsuit Over 'Smurfing' Campaign F...
YouTuber's CREEPY Post About Filming 'Conservative Daycare Centers' to Dunk on Nick Shirle...
Scott Jennings: Americans Need to See Someone in Power Imprisoned for Massive Blue...
Fraud Flashback: Tim Walz Said Refugees Were the Economic and Cultural Future of...
LA Mayor Karen Bass Says She’s ‘Sad’ Hispanic American Border Patrol Agents Are...
Five Years Later, Pelosi Says Speech Rip Was Impulse – Sure, Jan... Er,...
WaPo Gives Sob Story of Boy Who Won the Girls’ 400 Meter Twice

'We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt': Trump's lawyers respond to invitation to testify at impeachment trial

As Twitchy reported earlier Thursday, the House impeachment managers wrote a letter to Donald Trump inviting him to “provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021.” It was one of those offers you can’t refuse; the impeachment managers made it clear they’d interpret his absence as strong evidence of his guilt:

Advertisement

It seems as though Trump has had time to consider the invitation and decided to decline, according to an email sent by attorneys Bruce Castor and David Schoen to Rep. Jamie Raskin. “We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative interference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” it begins.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Perfectly stated.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos