Bill Melugin Profiles a Few More MN 'Neighbors' Tim Walz and Jacob Frey...
Scott Jennings Recommends Watching This Video of a CNN Guest's Rant About Trump...
Jim Acosta Helps Dems Make the Pivot to 'JD Vance Is Worse Than...
Lying Blind: Dem Ilhan Omar Says She Didn’t See That a Criminal Illegal...
White Noise: Singing Religious Radicals Target Minneapolis Retail Store Over ICE Arrest
Hold Them Accountable: DOJ Probe Into Walz/Frey for Shielding Illegals and Threatening ICE
Criminal Illegal Alien Walks Free After Ramming ICE Vehicles Head-On: Seattle Jury Says...
Trump and Powell Clash as Federal Reserve Faces Unprecedented Scrutiny
Traitor Alert: Florida Rep. Maxwell Frost Outs ICE Hotel Locations Around Orlando to...
Don't Put Your Parents in a Home—Build One Together ... A Radical (But...
Ignorant or Complicit: TMZ 'Shocked' to Learn About 'Nazi' DHS Stunt
Michael Knowles Makes Kyle Kulinski Look Like a Frothy-Mouthed Moron (Because He IS...
Lee Zeldin Speaks Slowly to Answer 'a Top Contender for Dumbest Reporter Question...
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer Tells DHS's Tricia McLaughlin That Renee Good Was Fatally Shot...
Jacob Frey Says Democrat Violence and Chaos Will End in Minnesota if Feds...

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement