Minnesota Childcare Director Goes a Little Off-Script: 'There Is Fraud'
MAZE Flashback to 2018: Fraud Is So Widespread People Are Buying Shares in...
Minnesota Mom Freezes Up After Reading Statement Saying, 'I Understand, Fraud Is Bad'
This Brief Summary of CNN's MN Daycare Fraud Investigation NAILS the Pitiful State...
Report: More Than 40 Daycares Opened the Same Day by the Same Somali...
Billionaire in Blessings: Reflecting on a Year Full of Love, Laughter, and Florida...
Manager of Daycare That Was Broken Into Says the Attention Has Been Frightening...
BONJOUR! Bari Weiss Has the PERFECT Response to Fake Journalist George Clooney's Criticism...
CNN Reporter Made a Few Phone Calls in Effort to Discredit Nick Shirley...
Mike Rowe Shares a Wonderful Christmas 'Carol' That We Can All Enjoy ......
THAT Oughta Do It! Mayor Brandon Johnson Gets Roasted Over Video About Staying...
Pay-to-Play Peter Gets Pickpocketed: London Thieves Snatch Schorsch's Gucci Murse in Ultim...
MN Star Tribune Reporter Deena Winter Deletes X Account After Obsessing Over Nick...
House Probes Minnesota Fraud: Walz & Ellison Invited – X Users Predict No-Show...
MN Dems Have Gone From 'Defund the Police' to 'Call the Cops If...

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement