No Regrets: Scott Jennings Doesn’t Hold Back on the Final Days of Biden’s...
Unscientific American: Magazine Preaches Feminist and Transgender Approach to ‘Climate Cha...
Shark Tank Host Wants to Sell Trump on Combining America’s and Canada’s Economies
Color-Coded: Chuck Todd Says Dems Warned Identity Politics Would Cost Latino Votes Two...
Light My Fire: Landmark Famously Featured on The Doors ‘Morrison Hotel’ Album Goes...
Political Post-Mortem: Pet Rocks, Chia Pets, Furbys, Brat Summer, Coconut-Pilled and Kamal...
Fox News Nuptials: Sean Hannity and Ainsley Earhardt Announce Engagement
Rocket Man: Elon Musk’s Funny Leaping GIF Really ‘Takes Off’ on X
WSJ: The End of Student Loan Debt Was in Sight, But Then Came...
COPE: Did Americans Vote for Trump or Is Something Darker Going On
Group Hosts ‘COVID-Cautious’ Bowling Party
Govs. Kathy Hochul and Gavin Newsom Post Their Happy Kwanzaa Videos
Amazon's 'Wonderful Life' Edit Cuts Out Emotional Heart of Film We Need Now...
Four AP Journos Vote for Olympic Boxer Imane Khelifas as Female Athlete of...
PBS NewsHour Picks Up PolitiFact's Lie of the Year (From Trump, of Course)

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement