Gone Too Soon, and Not Soon Enough to Fix It
Van Jones Thanked for Un-Defining Progressivism
NYT Left Baffled by the Radical Concept of a Married, Pregnant Working Mom...
Qatar Agents in Congress? McDonald’s Has Stricter Background Checks. Kat Cammack’s Bill Wa...
Bill Maher: 'I'm Not Living in Commie America' – Says His 2028 Vote...
Grover Norquist Uses Montana As an Example to Sell Tax Cuts
What a Loss (for Laughs): Bellows Drops Out of Maine Dem Senate Race...
Sen. Chuck Grassley Pleads on Behalf of Farmers
BACKLASH: X Takes Mark Ruffalo to Task for Shaming Elon Musk With Lame...
Worst. OnlyFans. EVER. --> TX Dem Offers to Share Her Explosive Diarrhea Story...
Mark Warner's FACE After ABC's Jon Karl Corrects Him on Voter ID Is...
*HIC* AOC's Rant Over People Making Fun of Her Foreign-Policy IGNORANCE Has X...
Adam Schiff SCOLDS Trump/Americans for Being Mean to Canada. SCHOOLING That Came Next...
Check OUT Maine Dem Ashley Webb's BATS**T Social Media (Oddly Enough, It's Not...
Cops Tried to Edit THIS Part Out of Sunny Hostin's DON'T YOU KNOW...

Fury erupts over Sen. Patrick Leahy's bill on email privacy; Update: Leahy scraps bill?

Senate Democrat Patrick Leahy has opened himself up to a firestorm of criticism for a proposal that critics say would allow the widespread surveillance of online communications — including email, Facebook, Google Docs, and Twitter DMs — to 22 federal agencies without a warrant.

Advertisement

Via CNET:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

In a rare show of bipartisanship, tweeters on the right and left have joined together to denounce what the proposal, which they consider an affront to First and Fourth Amendment rights.

A Senator Leahy staffer has taken to Twitter to try to defend the bill.

Advertisement

Few seem convinced.

Expect the furor surrounding this story to intensify as the proposal heads for a vote on the Senate floor next week.

***

Update:

That was fast. Faced with near-universal backlash, Leahy has apparently scrapped the proposed bill:

https://twitter.com/declanm/status/270989480960348161

Leahy’s about-face comes in response to a deluge of criticism today, including the ACLU saying that warrants should be required, and the conservative group FreedomWorks launching a petition to Congress — with over 2,300 messages sent so far — titled: “Tell Congress: Stay Out of My Email!”

This revised position will come as a relief to privacy advocates and business lobbyists, who have been scrambling since last week to figure out how to respond to Leahy’s revamped legislation. Some portions would have imposed new restrictions on law enforcement, while others would lessen existing ones, making the overall bill unpalatable to many groups.

Advertisement

Leahy’s proposal would have allowed over 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would have given the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.

https://twitter.com/npoppino/status/270990114480615425

Let’s hope the intrusive proposal is indeed dead in the water.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement