Mamdani Melt: NYC’s Socialist Mayor Wants the Democrat Party to Warm to His...
Governor Newsom Press Office Asks Why Republicans Hate That They Count Every Vote
Trial: Karmelo Anthony Was Asked to Leave 15 Times Before Fatal Stabbing
'How Is This Real?' Scott Pelley's Post-Firing Instagram Pic Sparks More Than a...
Report: Sen. Chris Murphy Funding Group Behind Anti-ICE Riots
The Economist Looks at the 'New' Dangerous Rhetoric About Anti-White Prejudice in British...
Border Czar Tom Homan Explains What Happens If Delaney Hall in Newark Is...
New Republic: The Firing of Scott Pelley Will 'Reverberate in American Journalism History'
WaPo: Pete Hegseth Takes Six of His Kids Along on Official Visit to...
Woman: Kiddo Came Home Crying After Being Told in Sex Ed That Only...
Obama Bro Says JB Pritzker Should Strip Family of Bears Ownership and Give...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Decides a Profanity-Laced Shaming Is the Best Way to...
Here's a Platner Campaign Update That's 'Everything You Need to Know About the...
Lefty Thug Trying to Block Vehicles at ICE Detention Center Gets Introduced to...
Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill

He Hasn't Changed: J.K. Rowling Shames Malcolm Gladwell for 'Weathervane' Shift on Trans Athlete Issue

Fuzzy Chimp

The last time we told you about Malcolm Gladwell, he was asking Conde Nast some hard questions after the company sacrificed Teen Vogue editor-in-chief Alexi McCammond to the woke mob.

Advertisement

Now Gladwell is back, and he's backtracking his stance on trans athletes.

We'll start with the story from Douglas K. Murray, who calls Gladwell a coward:

Here's more:

Could you be persuaded to say something you knew not to be true?

Most of us would probably say “Absolutely not. Never.” But the evidence is that even a small amount of social pressure can make grown adults say things they know to be untrue.

Take the case of Malcolm Gladwell. The Canadian-born author has had most of the good fortune that life can bring. His received opinions have gained him lucrative positions at liberal publications. His books have become international bestsellers. In fact, many authors might look in envy at the fact that some airport bookshops seem to have a whole Malcolm Gladwell section.

...

Appearing on a podcast called “The Real Science of Sport,” Gladwell referred to the vexing question of born males competing in women’s sports.

For most of us, this was always a no-brainer. It was obvious that someone who has been born a male, gone through male puberty and has all the physical advantages of being a man should be kept well clear of women’s sports. Otherwise women’s sports cease to be women’s sports, thousands of young female athletes would train hard for no reason and women’s sports would simply become a division of men’s sports for men who can’t succeed against their male peers.

Gladwell says he finds the arguments for men competing in women’s sports to be unconvincing.

But at a panel in 2022, he said that men should indeed be allowed to compete in women’s sports.

Advertisement

Gladwell says he felt 'cowed' into supporting trans athletes, and that careers were destroyed for doing so.

J.K. Rowling was having none of this, and torched Gladwell:

The entire post reads:

He’d have faced loss of approval from the cultural elite and received activist blowback, and even that wouldn’t have come with the tsunami of death and rape threats women face when they speak.

Non-famous people, mostly women, girls and gay people, have genuinely had their careers and indeed lives destroyed for saying what Gladwell was too pusillanimous to say, and Gladwell didn’t lift a finger in their defence. Like many well-known liberals, he was happy to watch members of the great unwashed bullied, traduced and defamed, fine with the erosion of freedom of speech, comfortable with young women being robbed of sporting honours and facing serious injury, because he valued his own standing and security more highly than acting on the feeble promptings of his conscience.

A rash of condescending men will swarm my mentions when I post this to tell me I should be pleased about Gladwell’s cautious backtracking. No. He hasn’t changed. He’s merely sensed a shift in what it’s acceptable to say and feels safe to align himself with the new consensus, excuses for his previous behaviour to the fore. He isn’t an ally, he’s a weathervane.

Changing sides years late, and only after you’ve realised the non-elite opposition is winning, isn’t a mark of integrity but of arse-covering. Those whose overriding focus is remaining in good odour with the in crowd can never be trusted. Gender identity ideology has been the modern arts world’s McCarthyism, and all Gladwell’s done is reveal himself as a man who’d have named names, but felt a bit uncomfortable about it afterwards.
Advertisement
She's brilliant.
Rowling has zero regrets for speaking out when she did.

Gladwell could learn a thing or two.

Rowling disagrees:

He's only reading the political winds. When they shift, again, he'll change sides.

Advertisement
All of this.
It's a great line.
We cannot forget who spoke out when it was necessary and who spoke out when it was safe.
And she's absolutely correct.
Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Twitchy, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement