Pro-Clancy Juror Is Asked How the 11 White Jurors Tried to Get the...
25 Years After 9/11: What America Forgot
George W. Bush Is Every American Looking at Zohran Mamdani in This Pic
Hey Guys, Don't Forget It's an Anniversary for Hillary Clinton As Well ...
James Talarico Shares His 'BANNED' Jimmy Kimmel Interview and It Does NOT Go...
Wasn't an Earthquake, BRO: Buck Sexton SHREDS Zohran Mamdani and His Deliberately Vague...
NYTimes Comms Infuriated by Attempt to 'Stoke Outrage' With Screenshots of Today's 9/11...
Ro Khanna Claims He's TEAM AMERICA — Blames Bibi for Gas and Groceries
American Heroes of 9/11: Stephen Siller
Gad Saad Shares DAMNING Shot of Eighth Grade 9/11 Lesson Plan a Mom...
AOC and Zohran Mamdani Spotted Yucking It UP As Names of Those Murdered...
Faith Over Fear: A Tribute to Charlie Kirk
He's Literally a Norm MacDonald MEME: Zohran Mamdani Quick to Claim HE Was...
People Have Questions About Gayle King's Reaction When Finding Out the Holdout Clancy...
Scott Jennings Has a New 'Title' for Hillary Clinton After She Claims October...

Too Little, Too Late! BBC Finally Admits Its Gaza Documentary Was Narrated by Son of Hamas Official

ImgFlip

We all know the media are in the bag for Hamas. 

They've spent the last two years blindly reporting Gaza death toll numbers fed to them by the 'Gaza Health Ministry' (read: Hamas), and demonizing Israel for defending itself against radical Islamic terrorists who seek to kill all the Jews and wipe Israel off the map.

Advertisement

But here's more proof of just how corrupt and dishonest the media are:

The BBC explains:

A BBC report has concluded that a documentary about the lives of children in Gaza breached editorial guidelines on accuracy.

The film was pulled from iPlayer in February after it emerged the 13-year-old narrator was the son of a Hamas official.

The review also found three members of the independent production company knew of the father's position, but no-one within the BBC knew this at the time.

It concludes that independent production company, Hoyo Films bears most of the responsibility, but that the BBC was not 'sufficiently proactive' with initial editorial checks.

And no one at the BBC -- who employs a cadre of lawyers, journalists, editors, and fact-checkers -- bothered to dig into any of this during production?

Really?

Advertisement

Yes.

Totally shocking.

Not.

Any time they can make Israel look like the bad guy, they do it.

Editorial guidelines or not.

The original story will, as always, have infinitely more views than the retraction.

By design.

The damage is done.

Which is what the BBC wanted.

Just like American networks.

We cannot.

Advertisement

Touché.

They'll never learn.

And they think they're the good guys in all this.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement