Hot Take: The Hostages Could Have Been Returned on Day 3 If Israel...
Bulwark Host Thinks Anti-Trumpers Who've Had It With Biden Are 'Children'
Ben 'Hamas' Rhodes Spreads the Terrorist Group's Propaganda with Zero Shame
Joe Biden Says Cutting Off Military Aid to Israel Is 'Preposterous' and 'Beyond...
'SNL Skit, Right?' MSNBC Analysts Add Paranormal Spin to Stormy Daniels' Trump Trial...
'Walkable City' Enthusiast Tries to Talk Up City Life... But WHY Did He...
If 'Greta Thunberg Protests with Anti-Semites' Was the Last Square on the...
White House Says It's Withholding Aid to Israel Because Hamas Has Suffered Enough
LOL! Everyone Laughs at 'Climate Defiance' as They Try (and FAIL!) to Talk...
Biden-Harris HQ Still Opposes Extra Measures to Ensure Illegals Can't Vote in Federal...
Biden's Latest Betrayal of Israel a Possible Harbinger of His November Defeat
POINTLESS: New Swiss Army Knife Will Be Knife-Free Due to 'Crime Waves'
Fani Willis: Funny Now That They Have a Bunch of Black DAs They...
Jury Awards Students Expelled From Woke California Catholic High School Over 'Blackface' $...
A Lavish Donation to the Miami Police Department Ruffles Some Feathers on Twitter

NYT executive editor Dean Baquet's pathetic attempt at headline damage control still won't be enough for the Outrage Mob

As Twitchy told you, the New York Times caved to the mob and changed a headline that wasn’t sufficiently harsh on Donald Trump:

Advertisement

Evidently the potential loss of Joan Walsh and Beto O’Rourke as subscribers was just too high a price to pay for a straightforward and accurate headline about Trump’s remarks. New York Times’ executive editor Dean Baquet is still out there trying to do damage control:

Really dodged a bullet.

More from the Daily Beast:

It was written on deadline and when it was passed along for approval we all saw it was a bad headline and changed it pretty quickly,” Baquet texted The Daily Beast on Tuesday morning as critics continued to vent their outrage on social media.

Baquet, for his part, texted: “I understand the concern people have. Headlines matter. But I hope they read the coverage, which I will argue was strong.”

If they had read the coverage, they would’ve seen that it was hardly the egregious pro-Trump lovefest they had made it out to be:

Advertisement

All the same, though, the New York Times will have to tread lightly going forward. They wouldn’t want to get busted for another horrific “error”:

Baquet declined to respond on the record to questions concerning how this error specifically occurred, how the Times will avoid such mistakes in the future, and various critics’ claims that this is only the latest in a series of missteps in the paper’s political and Trump-world coverage.

Oh well. At least in trying to make excuses for a headline that never should’ve been controversial in the first place, Baquet is ensuring that the mob will respect the New York Times going forward.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement