Never Let The Truth Get In the Way of a Good Story: CBS...
Musk See TV: Elon Eyes Possible Purchase of Floundering MSNBC from Comcast
The End is Near: Axios Leader Screams Into Void as Darkness Engulfs Dying...
Hero Secret Service Agent Reflects on 61st Anniversary of JFK Assassination
Hello PROJECTION! Joy Reid Says Your Trump Supporting, Democracy-Ending Family Will 'Turn...
When Government Grants You the 'Right' to Die, They Will Eventually Give You...
Forgive Us If We Don't Shed a Tear Over Rachel Maddow Getting a...
Georgetown Law in HOT Water After Denying Pregnant Mom Exam Accommodations
ABSOLUTELY NOT! Democratic Senator Peter Welch Wants to Restore Funding for Terror-Loving...
JOY! Trans Activist Says LGBTQ People Need Guns to Threaten Women Who Won't...
Massive Hypocrite David Axelrod Bemoans Trump Possibly Politicizing the DOJ ... Just Like...
Take Heart, Florida Woman Pam Bondi was Made in 'The Swamp' and is...
Eric Adams Sounds Positively Sensible Calling for 'Involuntary' Removal of Dangerous Peopl...
Adam Schiff Has a 'Justice Denied' Hissy Fit After News Breaks About Trump's...
J.K. Rowling Gives Trans Activist India Willoughby a BRUTALLY FUNNY Lesson in Basic...

'OUTRAGEOUS'! MGM Resorts' latest response to Las Vegas shooting sparks new 'PR NIGHTMARE'

As we approach the first anniversary of the deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas, killer Stephen Paddock’s motives remain as much a mystery as ever.

And speaking of mysterious motives, MGM Resorts International, which owns Mandalay Bay and the venue where the shooting occurred, is pre-emptively suing the survivors in the hopes of staving off future lawsuits against themselves:

Advertisement

The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for Oct. 1 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM parties “must be dismissed,” according to complaints filed Friday in Nevada and California.

MGM is a Nevada company, so any lawsuits belong in state court, [Las Vegas attorney Robert] Eglet said. He viewed the decision to file the complaints in federal court as a “blatant display of judge shopping” that “quite frankly verges on unethical.”

“I’ve never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like,” he said. “It’s just really sad that they would stoop to this level.”

It’s hard to argue with that assessment.

https://twitter.com/ConexAlway/status/1019219415731261440

Advertisement

Optics don’t get much worse than this.

https://twitter.com/nathantimmel/status/1019236619566673920

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement