Merry Christmas to All Including the Dead Terrorists: U.S. Airstrikes Target ISIS in...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
ProPublica: Expectant Mother Forced to Eat Clay and Charcoal Due to US Aid...
City of Minneapolis Says Plans for George Floyd Square Are Moving Forward
John Pavlovitz: Christians Who ‘Weaponize’ Christmas Are an Insult to Jesus
ABC News: Glaciers Could Disappear in Coming Decades, According to 'New Research'
It Wouldn't Be Christmas Without Perpetual Grinch Neil deGrasse Tyson Trying to Steal...
Premier of New South Wales Says They Don't Have Free Speech Like America...
Biden vs. Trump: Compare the Scene at the Southern Border Last Christmas to...
Scott Jennings Is Simply NOT Having a Wonderful Christmastime Because of This Beatle’s...
Merry Christmas to Everyone! Yes, Even the Worst of the Worst on the...
Parents Beware: Beloved Ms. Rachel Now on Team with NYC's Far-Left Mayor –...
Get Christ Out of Christmas? Atheists Gets Their Tinsel in a Twist When...
Christmas Morning Merry Meme Madness
NBC News: Judges Who Ruled Against Trump Say Harassment and Threats Have Upended...

'OUTRAGEOUS'! MGM Resorts' latest response to Las Vegas shooting sparks new 'PR NIGHTMARE'

As we approach the first anniversary of the deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas, killer Stephen Paddock’s motives remain as much a mystery as ever.

And speaking of mysterious motives, MGM Resorts International, which owns Mandalay Bay and the venue where the shooting occurred, is pre-emptively suing the survivors in the hopes of staving off future lawsuits against themselves:

Advertisement

The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for Oct. 1 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM parties “must be dismissed,” according to complaints filed Friday in Nevada and California.

MGM is a Nevada company, so any lawsuits belong in state court, [Las Vegas attorney Robert] Eglet said. He viewed the decision to file the complaints in federal court as a “blatant display of judge shopping” that “quite frankly verges on unethical.”

“I’ve never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like,” he said. “It’s just really sad that they would stoop to this level.”

It’s hard to argue with that assessment.

https://twitter.com/ConexAlway/status/1019219415731261440

Advertisement

Optics don’t get much worse than this.

https://twitter.com/nathantimmel/status/1019236619566673920

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement