Earlier this week, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes couldn’t resist taking a shot at Fox News over Bill O’Reilly:
Chris Hayes: 'Might Be a Little Awkward' for Fox News to Keep Talking About Weinstein Now… https://t.co/L1PMxjMhIK (VIDEO) pic.twitter.com/JLr2YUvTUm
— Mediaite (@Mediaite) October 24, 2017
More from Mediaite:
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tonight opened a segment on the Bill O’Reilly news with clips of Fox Newsers going in on Harvey Weinstein and the silent complicity of those around him.
And they’re not wrong to raise those questions, Hayes added, but it “might be a little awkward” for them to keep covering this now.
…
And so Hayes showed clips of Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Judge Jeanine Pirro for talking about the complicity of people who were aware of the disgusting actions by one of their own and kept quiet.
What’s that saying again? You know, the one about glass houses and stones?
You were saying, @chrislhayes pic.twitter.com/NgVIoLcrY2
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) October 26, 2017
Awkward.
— Deanna Lynn ?? (@Love_AZ_) October 26, 2017
Mark Halperin worked at MSNBC. That’s where Chris Hayes works. By Hayes’ logic, was he complicit?
Moral of the story: There are sleazy creeps of all political stripes, & pretending your side is morally superior is ridiculous. https://t.co/phPVfJylN0
— Sarah Rumpf (@rumpfshaker) October 26, 2017
Precisely why media organizations shouldn't be focused on what other orgs are doing. Clean up your own houses.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) October 26, 2017
This goes for Fox v CNN and CNN v Fox v MSNBC. Everyone.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) October 26, 2017
Yep. The moral preening is lame (even if it weren't unjustified)
— Sarah Rumpf (@rumpfshaker) October 26, 2017
***
Update:
WELP https://t.co/eYL58e387s pic.twitter.com/IjeeM1dLjI
— Allahpundit (@allahpundit) October 26, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member