Have you no shame, sir? Flanked by children, and their letters, as props, President Obama unveiled his gun-grabbing plans today. During the display, he said that the first task of society is to keep children safe. Big Daddy Government!

He also said this:

Again. Yesterday, conservatives shredded that shameful hypocrisy. President Obama continued to invoke the right to life. Today, the ever-repugnant Piers Morgan swoons over the president’s remarks.

Oh, really? These Twitter users are wondering about that; What about abortion? Do you, Piers, and President Obama now recognize the fundamental right to life?



That’s right. Even if a baby survived an abortion attempt, he thought that concern for the doctor performing the abortion trumped that child’s right to life, if the baby insisted upon ‘not just coming out limp and dead.

The sad truth. But, that’s just a normal day, right, Mr. President?

This is how we will be judged, indeed.


Practice what you preach, Mr. President.

  • colliemum

    Not surprised that Musket Morgan chimed in straightaway. I think he wrote that speech for the presser – tehre were simply too many similar talking points we’ve heard before used by Morgan.

  • LightSabre

    I watched the theatre put on by Obama and Biden today. And who is sitting on the front row with rapt attention? Eric Holder, of Fast & Furious. God, the irony and hypocrisy. 4 more years of this? I’ll never make it.

    • itzyaboi95

      I’m already sick of this political circus.

    • rinodino

      So sad, hey Canada and Mexico are some options for ya, take care, see ya!!!!

      • Underwater

        If all Republicans left the US, where would Obama get his money to pay for his Kingdom? He certainly won’t get it from the people who voted for him. I wonder if there is a study on the amount of taxes the people who voted for Romney pay as opposed to the amount of taxes paid by those who voted for Obama. I bet 95% of the taxes are paid by Romney supporters. So, you sir, would need to go get a job.

        • Joseph Phillips

          When takers take more than the makers make, things will get violent.

          • SpinMeNot

            We are already there … there is no way the US can meet its unfunded liabilities. The violence in Chicago is the start … it will spread as things get worse.

        • daisy amos

          There are many other countries that would love to take taxpayers and spenders..and you don’t have to be Gerard Depardieu!

      • shimauma

        You need conservatives to stick around. We pay the bills while turds like yourself sleep off the choom in your mom’s basement.

      • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

        Dave, make sure that if I ever have the misfortune of meeting you, that you introduce yourself so I know whom not to invite into my house when the Obamazombies are trampling you in their haste to get what’s rightfully mine.

  • http://www.facebook.com/elbrowno Rudy Ponce

    334,000 abortions last year in america. Its OK tho, because the aborted can’t vote.

    • http://twitter.com/equaltreatment Elaine

      Obama thinks a partial birth abortion, where the abortionist punctures a baby’s head and sucks out the brain is okay.. and if the baby survives, he thinks you should set “IT” aside to die? The words ‘right to life’ coming out of his mouth are repugnant.

      • Ronald

        We define life differently than Obama does. If Obama doesn’t recognise a fetus as alive, well then, you see where this goes.

    • Judy B

      The number is much higher…sadly.

    • daisy amos

      And he’s tearfully claiming he wants to protect children from guns, but not the unborn from the abortionist’s forceps?

  • itzyaboi95

    So, he uses that as a gateway to attack constitutional rights.

  • kayakingfatso

    Protecting my children is my job. I’d rather handle the task than allow the government to provide “protection”.

  • Junie3

    Congress needs to address gun running again and write a bill that throws anyone doing it thrown in gitmo for life or aborted with the guns they run.

  • Bob Smooper

    It has been legally established by the Supreme Court that life does not begin at conception and that aborting a foetus does not constitute ending a life as the foetus is not considered a life.

    Therefore the life of an actual child is more important than the non-life of a ball of cells.

    • Joe W.

      Bull crap.

    • WisconsinPatriot

      AWWWW, bless your heart. If you can square that with God. I am certain he disagrees.

    • ZoriahShepard

      The problem dear heart, is that your leader also supports partial birth abortion when this so called ‘non-life of a ball of cells’ is considered life. Oh and ask the women who’ve had abortions how that ‘non-life of a ball of cells’ has affected their lives.

    • GoSellCrazySomeplaceElse

      I hate to tell you, but the SCOTUS is not science and science will tell you, along with actual proof in pictures, that you’re wrong. But #MentalLibness will continue their belief, so they can continue to murder an unwanted child. Also, your president believes in third term abortion, partial birth abortion, sucking out the limbs and collapsing the baby’s head. So, feel good about your vile propaganda…luckily your mother didn’t plug in the Hoover.

      • $21367552

        And you clearly show how scientifically and medically literate you are with such specific, well-defined terms as “partial birth abortion”

        • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

          Well gee, thanks SO much for informing us of the correct well-defined term. You may go look it up now.

        • GoSellCrazySomeplaceElse

          So, what scientific term would you use? Enlighten me…maybe ‘mutilated baby parts’. I’m sure the dense and dumb can educate me, instead of thinking they can embarrass me with an absolutely idiotic response.

        • Catchance

          How about murder and mutilation? Would that suit you better?

    • kilthan

      The Supreme Court is also supremely ignorant of Science, as are you. that ‘non-life of a ball of cells’ is genetically human, and is genetically distinct, ie different, from its Parents. You see, according to science, which liberals claim to be all about, it is a human life distinct from its parents from the moment the sperm fertilizes the egg. It is human, and should have the same rights and protections as any other human. Only worshipers of Anti-Life claim different.

      Liberalism is Anti-Life.

    • Todd Hill

      What else could that “non-life of a ball of cells” become if not a human being? A table, perhaps? Oh, a pickup truck! No? Maybe it becomes a bag of roasted Starbucks coffee beans. If not that, then how about a nice steaming plate of poutine? I had no idea that a fetus was so versatile!

    • shimauma

      Yeah I can see you explaining that one to the Creator of the Universe to justify those murders….”but but but the supreme court said I could -AAAAAARRRGH”(sound of flames rising)

    • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

      Oh really? Which ruling was that?

    • http://twitter.com/who_me_too RadicalRebelWhoMeToo

      A “ball of living cells” is not life??? You go with that.

    • Grumpa Grumpus

      @Mark Cooper:

      And the same legal body also found that enslaving black was legal.

      So, since the Dredd Scott decision, I figure anyone with 2 working brain cells would realize that we’re actually fortunate when SCOTUS does get it right.

      Glad we got that straightened out.

      And everyone’s “a ball of cells”, so what’s your point?

  • http://apostrophejones.com/ Gloves Donahue, Jr.

    Isn’t Barry The Dronemaster, raining death from the sky on anyone he chooses?

    • Joseph Phillips

      Barry the Dronemaster! LOL – niiiicccee. I like to call him Barry, but now it’s Barry the Dronemaster.

  • BeyondPolls

    If an unborn equality law will save just one child’s life, then it is worth it.

  • notenoughtime

    Agree that Obama and the liberal mindset have no respect for human life. If so, they would not make eliminating life as easy as they do!

  • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

    Too bad that Twitter account is run by his campaign lackeys, and not O himself. As the bio says, all ‘official’ tweets are signed ‘bo’. In any event, go fuck yourself, Mr. President. I never thought I would live to see the day when such a respected and revered title as ‘Mr. President’ could reach the same emotional low of an expletive.

  • $23629333

    The little Austrian once referred to himself as the world’s coldest man; given the Prevaricator-in-Chief’s absolute support of abortion and euthanasia, I would suggest that he would give the little Austrian a run for that title. As for duplicity, no one is even close to the PiC in that department.

    • http://twitter.com/who_me_too RadicalRebelWhoMeToo

      Barry should just grow the ‘stache already. He’s not fooling anybody.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    1.2 million babies killed every year in America. This con-man is some piece of work.

  • daisy amos

    Obama & Biden claim they want to protect children from guns, but not the unborn from the abortionist’s forceps? Not consistent!

  • Lloyd Purvis

    I admire everyone’s intestinal fortitude……my doctor tells me to be careful with the excess gas……I believe liberals qualify as excess gas

  • moonsbreath

    Right to Life, except if they’re an inconvenience…right Mr. Obama?