Oh, but Democrats have laminated For the Women™ cards. They couldn’t possibly be arguing that a raped woman is better than an armed woman.

Then again, GOP Rep. Steve Stockman’s tweet really isn’t a surprise, is it?

Remember when Colorado Democrat Joe Salazar insisted hysterical womenfolk can’t be trusted with guns because they might misidentify a rape threat? Or how ’bout when Amanda Marcotte tweeted that only the “idiot parade” would think shooting a date rapist would prevent rape?

Bob Beckel wondered if it wasn’t a little much for a woman to shoot her date if he tries to rape her. And Colorado state Sen. Evie Hudak lectured rape survivor Amanda Collins, “Chances are that if you would have had a gun, then he would have been able to get that from you and possibly use it against you.”

But it’s conservatives waging a War on Women, right?

Women shouldn’t “be allowed” to use firearms to defend themselves against rape? Try telling that to all the smart, empowered, gun-totin’ ladies who participated in #LadiesGunNight.

  • OLLPOH

    Pea shooters will not get the job done!

    • twinx

      I think the Dems mean PEE-shooters…

      • Texan357

        *Especially* appropriate comment considering the suggestion that incipient rape victims soil themselves. Well done. :)

        • Connie M

          I would rather pull out my gun and make HIM soil himself.

          • Ken Alan Draper

            nothing spoils a rapists “Amourous” mood like a sucking chest wound. & they richly deserve it.

          • CoastalMaineBird

            I’m not a woman, but I’d consider aiming a bit lower.

          • Ken Alan Draper

            1st rule of self-defense with a gun, aim for center of mass, continue to shoot till assailent drops.

          • $22639970

            Respectfully, the first rule of self-defense with a gun is to have one, Ken.

          • Ken Alan Draper

            1st rule of self-defense with a gun, aim for center of mass, continue to shoot till assailent drops.

          • Ken Alan Draper

            nothing spoils a rapists “Amourous” mood like a sucking chest wound. & they richly deserve it.

        • twinx

          😉

      • TexasMom2012

        I think Democrats should not be allowed to use guns to protect themselves, not should they be allowed to have armed security. The problem is they want to disarm everyone else.

    • twinx

      I think the Dems mean PEE-shooters…

    • 1SkepticalChick

      Spitballs.

    • 1SkepticalChick

      Spitballs.

    • thetreyman

      2014 democrat campaign slogan: keeping rape safe and available.

      • Ken Alan Draper

        It’s freedom of Rapist’s choice.

      • Ken Alan Draper

        It’s freedom of Rapist’s choice.

  • OLLPOH

    Pea shooters will not get the job done!

  • CatHerder

    Women should be allowed to defend themselves with anything they can damn well heft! Same for men!

    • Guest

      Eliminate most of the gun laws and inner city gangs would disappear. Require women to be trained with weapons as part of the “Sex ed” classes they have instead of teaching them how to put condoms on a banana and rapes would become scarce.

      • Robert Zornes

        Yup….

    • Clayton Grant

      Damed straight! People who say things like those callers to Congressman Stockman’s office probably still believe in the rule of thumb, which prohibited men from beating their wives with any stick bigger than their thumb.

  • CatHerder

    Women should be allowed to defend themselves with anything they can damn well heft! Same for men!

  • JPeyton

    Again the dumbocrats let their ass over load their mouth. Remember what you have said when your mother, wife or daughter is laid out on the floor being raped by some bastard. I love my family members too much to let that happen.

  • JPeyton

    Again the dumbocrats let their ass over load their mouth. Remember what you have said when your mother, wife or daughter is laid out on the floor being raped by some bastard. I love my family members too much to let that happen.

  • V the K

    In fairness, the Democrats don’t think *anybody* should be allowed to own a gun.

    • Guest

      They prefer murders committed by knifes and blunt objects and suicides committed by driving into a river with their kids strapped in their child seats.

    • $4356589

      Show us a definitive piece of legislation that seeks to strip everyone in America of their firearms. You can’t because there is none. Are you sheeple so dumb as to believe your Koch masters that Obama and Democrats are trying to take everyone’s guns away? It’s simply NOT TRUE. Efforts to cultivate and vet responsible gun owners and weed out people who shouldn’t own guns =/= taking everyone’s guns away. Sheesh.

      • GaryTheBrave

        That’s the ultimate goal. Those lawmakers in NJ confirmed that.

      • journogal

        Show us where he isn’t? It isn’t going to be done at once, just little by little. California has introduced a bill that if you want ammo, submit personal information and pay $50. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guns-boy-scouts-20130530,0,3573485.story

        Or how about this? http://www.myfoxny.com/story/22469110/court-upholds-rifle-sales-reporting-requirement

        Just because it doesn’t happen all at once, doesn’t mean that isn’t the end game. Many were called crazy to think the IRS was targeting them…look how that has turned out.

        • V the K

          It’s like saying Democrats aren’t “technically” socialists because they still permit privately owned businesses to exist; even though every business they permit to exist is tied up in regulation, bureaucracy, and red tape so that the state controls it anyway.

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        Democrats operate on incrementalism. There are already about 20,000 federal, state and local firearms laws on the books that ONLY affect law abiding people. What ONE new one is going to achieve this utopia that you seem to think can exist?

        Restricting citizen’s rights = tyranny. Sheesh.

        • Ken Alan Draper

          Last I checked there are already background checks on firearm purchases, even at gunshows. but if someone who does not have a federal firearms license decides to sell a firearm how would the government ever know about it? the expanded background check system would do nothing to stop the type of transaction that they claim it was designed to stop. besides, the 2nd amendment says “the rights of the people to own & bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (Infringe-to act as to limit, undermine, or encroach on.)

        • Ken Alan Draper

          Last I checked there are already background checks on firearm purchases, even at gunshows. but if someone who does not have a federal firearms license decides to sell a firearm how would the government ever know about it? the expanded background check system would do nothing to stop the type of transaction that they claim it was designed to stop. besides, the 2nd amendment says “the rights of the people to own & bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (Infringe-to act as to limit, undermine, or encroach on.)

      • Shawneuser

        Right. Just like the ultimate goal of all pro-life legislation isn’t the end of all abortion. No, its only putting waiting periods and time restrictions and counseling in as “reasonable, common-sense efforts to ‘cultivate and vet responsible'” aborters.

        Hahaha… Wake UP! Who is the sheeple here?

        • kim

          The difference is, we honestly admit our end goal is to repeal roe v wade but are willing to settle for common sense restrictions for now. Libs never like to admit what they are up to and just mock those who catch them until it is time to implement the end game

        • svobodnik

          The ultimate goal of the “pro-life” movement is to put the legality of abortion back in the hands of the state legislatures. There is no “affirmation” for abortion in the Constitution.

          • Strider

            That would be a start. But the goal is to save children’s lives.

      • robcrawford2

        “Show us a definitive piece of legislation that seeks to strip everyone in America of their firearms.”

        So because they haven’t written the legislation yet — just stated that as their goal repeatedly — it’s NOT TRUEQ!!!!

        Again, they’ve said it repeatedly. In public. Documented. It’s a simple fact that it’s their goal. You’re either a useful idiot or a knowing liar.

      • Hanoverfist

        1. We are FREE WOMEN and MEN. We have no masters, but apparently people like you need obama, soros, and other mewling democrats to be your masters.

        2. We have responsible LEGAL gun owners. What we need are responsible legislatures who will ENFORCE the laws already on the books.

        3. The brainwashing, or in lib speak behavioral modification, has already begun in our schools.

        4. Go ahead and keep believing we ‘re stupid. WE KNOW YOUR LIES.
        Your kind thinks that since we’re sheep that we will blindly follow you. All I’ve got to say to all the gun grabbers is
        IT SUCKS TO BE YOU.

      • V the K

        Reminder: Chuck Schumer’s gun control bill would have made it a felony under Federal law for a hunter to loan his hunting rifle to his best friend, would have made it a felony to inspect or handle firearm without a background check; would have made it a felony to leave your gun locked at home while on a trip if the house was occupied by a family member without a Federal background check.

        Leftist Progressives called this “Common Sense Gun Legislation.”

      • Ronald Green

        Tell me, when both Diane Fienstien and Charles Schumer both tell us that their ultimate goal is take all guns from the American public why shouldn’t I believe them and why don’t you?

        • V the K

          ““If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them – Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in – I would have done it. I could not do that – the votes weren’t here.” – Senator Dingbat Feinstein (D-California)

      • BigDogJunction

        LOL! Bringing out the Koch Card.

        The libtard mantra: Deflect, Dismiss, Belittle, Ignore.

        Hey, Einstein… might want to see where some of those DNC sponsored events are getting finances from. Yeah… Koch brothers. They don’t play any side other than their own. Sooner you learn that and quit trying to portray them as some sorts of puppet masters, the smarter you might start looking, Tool.

        The dems are ON RECORD saying, the exact opposite of you. You too stupid, to comprehend their own words?

      • kim

        And have you talked to anyone who believed the line about income tax being voluntary and not more than 7% of a person’s income? How did that work out? Or how Obamacare wasn’t forcing anyone to buy anything they didn’t want? Or giving up what they already had?

      • Strider

        Those laws, processes, and procedures already exist. And rights are never taken away in a single, definitive move. It’s always gradual–one more little slice, and some people convince themselves it’s such a small thing, it won’t be that bad. Some of us have read and lived too much history to allow our rights, freedoms, and sheer safety to be sliced away, gradually or otherwise.

    • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

      Not true, V. Dems love for criminals their voting base to have guns.

    • kim

      not true. They celebrate cop killers. Defend terrorists and make excuses for gang members. Hell they have serial killer fan clubs

  • journogal

    Do liberals really believe that pee-ing and/or vomiting on one self is going to deter an attacker?

    • Canadian in USA

      Sadly, yes.

    • Guest

      Well, I don’t think they consider rape an “attack”. Its just a bad date and its the sluts fault for not putting out.

      • journogal

        Especially if said rapists uses condom (so no DNA can be found or less, I should say.) Story years ago about people arguing if an attacker uses a condom, it’s consensual and not rape. Have to see if I can find that…

        • Guest

          I vaguely remember that story. I got linked to it somehow when Akin made a joke of himself in MO by using the term “legitimate rape”.

          • kim

            that wasn’t a ‘joke’ it was a reference to statutory rape. Which is consensual sex between an adult and a minor. Legally rape, but not to the 17 yr old girl indulging or her 19 yr old boyfriend.

        • Jay Stevens

          I don’t remember where, man broke into woman;s home. She talked him into wearing condom before he raped her. After police caught him, he tried to say the sex was consensual because she asked him to wear a condom. Court and jury convicted him anyway. YAAY!

      • robcrawford2

        That’s why Clinton and the Kennedys are their heroes.

  • journogal

    Do liberals really believe that pee-ing and/or vomiting on one self is going to deter an attacker?

  • Bemani Dog

    This isn’t a surprise at all. Joe Biden’s said the very same thing!

    • Public_Man

      Yep – I thought it was cute when he pretended to possess an adult male level of testosterone.

  • Bemani Dog

    This isn’t a surprise at all. Joe Biden’s said the very same thing!

  • ObamaFail

    Democrats support criminal rights more than they do law-abiding citizens. What it is, is that the Dems don’t like the idea of a rapist not getting to commit his crime.

    • camnpat

      I don’t think it is that they like the idea of a rapist not getting to commit a crime. It is the screwed up moral equivalencies tied to emotional responses where an individual is not responsible for his/her own actions. I think they see a weapon as only capable of killing and a rapist as a “human life” for as evil as he can be. The rapist is not doing this because he is evil or crazy but because of someone else’s fault (parents, family, society, etc). Thus, in their scale of equivalencies, not terminating (or risking terminating) “a life” is better than the suffering the rape victim goes through. After all a victim can be “treated” and a pregnancy “easily” terminated.

      • Bigkev1756

        An honest evaluation of the progressive mind

      • kim

        ironic hmm? not ‘terminating’ the life of a rapist or killer
        yet ‘terminating’ the life of infants on a daily basis

        • camnpat

          Well, don’t forget: for the no guns/yes abortion crowd a rapist is still a person, but a baby is no more than a fetus until it can rape somebody.

  • ObamaFail

    Democrats support criminal rights more than they do law-abiding citizens. What it is, is that the Dems don’t like the idea of a rapist not getting to commit his crime.

  • aposematic

    The real war on women…

  • aposematic

    The real war on women…

  • FIRE THEM ALL- 2014

    Honestly are these people for real? Some of the suggestions for handling a rapist coming from the left aren’t even funny, let alone worth trying. I suppose they will be the first in line to claim murder if someone actually shoots a rapist especially if she knows them, so ladies practice practice practice, and take out a knee cap, if your aim is good enough it is possible. Don’t kill the bugger because the liberal nutjobs will blame you, which of course would end their argument of blaming the victim. But here’s the deal, in all my years on this planet I have never been raped, there is a good reason for that, I don’t get drunk at parties, I don’t go out with strangers that I don’t know, and I don’t stick around abusive relationships. I run not walk to the nearest exit. But more important than all that I don’t put myself in the position of being where I can get raped. I don’t go to men’s hotel rooms thinking they want to talk, and I don’t go to places where I would have to go to my car after dark where one of these rapist can lurk. Furthermore I don’t act like I’m looking for it either with my speech or behavior.

    Some of the responsibility if not all of it is on the individual who may be a target for such a vile act.

    • Billie Slash

      Under liberal logic, if a woman shoots her rapist dead, then she can’t be a perpetual victim, and she won’t have a tv movie made about her ordeal to memorialize her victimhood. To deny these people any drama is what irks them the most.

      • Canadian in USA

        Under liberal logic, if a woman shoots her rapist, she’d probably be tried for attempted murder.

      • Sonya A. Willis

        Don’t forget the emotions. Drama and emotions go hand in hand with liberals.

    • Billie Slash

      Under liberal logic, if a woman shoots her rapist dead, then she can’t be a perpetual victim, and she won’t have a tv movie made about her ordeal to memorialize her victimhood. To deny these people any drama is what irks them the most.

    • Jay Stevens

      All of that will greatly reduce the odds of your being raped, but none of it will stop someone from breaking in while you are home alone or out driving around by yourself. You will still need some serious firepower to stand a good chance.

    • Spinmamma

      I agreed with you up until the last sentence. Some, yes, but there are many many cases of rape where the female was doing nothing wrong except to be in the wrong place (parking lot, stairwell, public park, or even her own house) at the wrong time, or she put her trust in the wrong person.

    • Miss Clairee

      Great points you have made!

    • kim

      1. Ladies, do not shoot to wound. Why be sued and get a liberal jury who feels bad that the rapist grew up poor and angry? If you must shoot to save yourself, shoot to kill and handle the consequences.

      2. While I understand what you mean about not putting yourself in dangerous situations, many women who are raped are busy doing nothing more dangerous than sleeping in their own beds at the time. Or stopping at a rest area to use the bathroom. Or walking to their car after shopping when grabbed.While it is always smart to be careful of what you are doing and who you are with, you are always at risk.
      But NONE of the responsibility of being raped is on the woman being raped. No matter where she went, what she was wearing or who she was with, she is not advertising for anyone to rape her unless she is actually carrying a sign asking for someone to rape her.

  • FIRE THEM ALL- 2014

    Honestly are these people for real? Some of the suggestions for handling a rapist coming from the left aren’t even funny, let alone worth trying. I suppose they will be the first in line to claim murder if someone actually shoots a rapist especially if she knows them, so ladies practice practice practice, and take out a knee cap, if your aim is good enough it is possible. Don’t kill the bugger because the liberal nutjobs will blame you, which of course would end their argument of blaming the victim. But here’s the deal, in all my years on this planet I have never been raped, there is a good reason for that, I don’t get drunk at parties, I don’t go out with strangers that I don’t know, and I don’t stick around abusive relationships. I run not walk to the nearest exit. But more important than all that I don’t put myself in the position of being where I can get raped. I don’t go to men’s hotel rooms thinking they want to talk, and I don’t go to places where I would have to go to my car after dark where one of these rapist can lurk. Furthermore I don’t act like I’m looking for it either with my speech or behavior.

    Some of the responsibility if not all of it is on the individual who may be a target for such a vile act.

  • James Rose

    Maybe Dems shouldn’t be allowed to use words to express themselves when they have another idiotic thought.

    • vetgal1970

      Just imagine how quiet it would be without all of their constant screeching. 😉

  • James Rose

    Maybe Dems shouldn’t be allowed to use words to express themselves when they have another idiotic thought.

  • I M Free

    that’s what they preach. libs will tell you just spread your legs and
    when you get pregnant, go to plan parenthood for abortion c/o taxpayers.
    i don’t know how to describe these kind of people. perhaps they are not
    humans we believed came from adam and eve but from evolution of apes
    which again they preached and believe.

    • Jay Stevens

      You forgot “Relax and enjoy it.”

  • I M Free

    that’s what they preach. libs will tell you just spread your legs and
    when you get pregnant, go to plan parenthood for abortion c/o taxpayers.
    i don’t know how to describe these kind of people. perhaps they are not
    humans we believed came from adam and eve but from evolution of apes
    which again they preached and believe.

  • Carey Hayden

    Liberals will be happy to know that some rape victims are unarmed AND denied police protection: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/30/oregon-woman-raped-after-911-call-goes-unanswered

    However, it’s not surprising that this happens in the VERY blue state of Oregon!!

  • Carey Hayden

    Liberals will be happy to know that some rape victims are unarmed AND denied police protection: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/30/oregon-woman-raped-after-911-call-goes-unanswered

    However, it’s not surprising that this happens in the VERY blue state of Oregon!!

  • trixiewoobeans

    I do believe some of those callers WERE rapists, past, present and future.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marcy-Cook/1001619613 Marcy Cook

    The dem callers were all rapists that’s why they object. Just ignore.

  • BeeKaaay

    Bloodthirsty leftwingwackos approve of rape, that’s why they don’t want women to have guns.

    • AMSilver

      I’ve already made my prediction: after the debauched left-wing sex crowd makes enough progress with their legalize pedophilia campaign, consent is the next sexual more that they’ll attack.

      • SineWaveII

        Ironic isn’t it? Since it was the left that invented the concept of ‘consent’? I guess when the only pleasure you have is breaking taboos and now the only taboos left are the taboos from the left; well what’s a taboo-breaker to do?
        Next look for Hollywood to suddenly decide the the “N” word is the coolest word ever and has to be included in all movies and tv shows. And not allowing it is “censorship” Like the “F” word was in the 80s.

      • journogal

        They kind of have; I’ve come across a few articles quoting Hollywood intellectuals about that…I think it’s a trial balloon.

      • BeeKaaay

        Look at how leftwingwackos handle the Roman Polanski thing. They approve of him raping a 13 year old girl. Pedophilia is a good thing when leftwingwackos do it.

      • BeeKaaay

        No surprise there. They believe that there are no morals and ethics when it comes to sex. They WILL approve of rape and pedophilia next. After all, those are just “sexual orientations” we need to be tolerant of.

  • $35072932

    Detroit Citizens Protect Themselves After Police Force Decimated
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-31/detroit-citizens-protect-themselves-after-police-force-decimated.html
    As crime hobbles Detroit (9845MF)’s attempts to revive itself, the city is bolstering its police department by having unarmed citizens patrol the streets in a program that costs less than annual salaries and benefits for three officers.

    Volunteers given radios and matching T-shirts help officers protect neighborhoods where burglaries, thefts and thugs drive away people who can’t rely on a police force that lost a quarter of its strength since 2009. With 25 patrols on the streets, the city hopes to add three each year. Meanwhile, the homicide rate continues rising.

    • Jay Stevens

      Well, of course the homicide rate continues to ris. There are more soft targets running around.

  • grais

    Brilliant! Should they wear ‘Gun Free Zone’ t-shirts, too?

  • anabomb25

    Democrats are ok with saying that until it happens to them

    • Jay Stevens

      Well, you know what they say, “A conservative is a liberal who’s just been mugged.”

  • vetgal1970

    Headline should read Dim callers. If they would let us reinstate meaningful penalties to punish people who think they have a right to our bodies or our property, we wouldn’t feel the need to shoot at them.

    If you can’t stay off my land and let me go about my day unmolested, you forfeit your right to gripe about the consequences.

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      These same “Victim enablers” are the same ones who want Lesser punishments for serious crimes as well…The cops, witnesses, and our Legal system no longer scare these Criminals (Look at CHICAGO!). We need to:1)Keep our Law-Abiding citizens armed, and 2)Go back to the Constitution’s ORIGINAL PENALTIES for Murder, Rape, Molestation, Treason, etc. including use of the DEATH PENALTY for the Guilty! #RightWard Jawamax 8<{D}

      • vetgal1970

        At the very least they could stop trying to prosecute people who have the audacity to use force to stop a person from entering their home uninvited. I’m all for going back to the penalties that actually MEAN something.

        Tarring and Feathering should be reserved ‘especially’ for those in government who attempt to undermine OUR Constitutional protection. It’s not too much to expect someone to mean it when they swear an Oath, especially when they spend trillions of dollars campaigning for the job.

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      These same “Victim enablers” are the same ones who want Lesser punishments for serious crimes as well…The cops, witnesses, and our Legal system no longer scare these Criminals (Look at CHICAGO!). We need to:1)Keep our Law-Abiding citizens armed, and 2)Go back to the Constitution’s ORIGINAL PENALTIES for Murder, Rape, Molestation, Treason, etc. including use of the DEATH PENALTY for the Guilty! #RightWard Jawamax 8<{D}

  • HARP2

    Looking at most democrat women, it`s understandable, since that might be the only nookie they get.

  • Bill Cassill

    You’re supposed to vomit and $hit yourself according to these a$$clowns. Awesome self-defense tactic. Wonder if the victim disarmament crowd plans on having classes so the fairer gender can learn to do this on command?

  • Dexter Alarius

    Roman Polanski is their favorite director. Who’s surprised?

  • http://twitter.com/yahneverknowCB yahneverknow

    Will Unca Sam pay for the acrylics to use when scratching at the eyes of the attacker?

    #welfarestate

  • Marvin Nelson

    This is beyond pathetic. I stop feeling sorry for these liberal morons when they take it upon themselves to decide methods for women’s self defense. Their arguments haved crossed the boundary into the Twilight Zone (with sincere apologies to Rod Serling).

  • https://twitter.com/Captain_Cy_kun Cy

    “Women should be allowed to defend themselves! Without guns. In the kitchen. While making me a sandwich.” – Liberals

  • L R

    As a Texas woman, I will use a gun for protection when and where I choose, as is my 2nd amendment right. I have been taught that when I need to defend myself that I shoot to kill. So, know for certainty that I will kill a rapist sometime before during or after the attack!

    • Hanoverfist

      They don’t want you thinking for yourself. They want you to lie there all peaceful, and when it’s over to become a victim. Never mind the results.

      Depression: We have drugs for that.

      Hating men: Become a Feminist or
      better yet a Lesbian.

      Suicidal: Well just don’t use a gun.

  • Jules

    The Democrats/Liberals never cease to amaze me. They quite possibly are the most ignorant people in the US and on the planet. Are women supposed to be mind readers? Are women supposed to be able to predict whether or not the rapist will proceed to murder? Many rapes end in murder; that is a fact. And, who is to say which violent acts can be met with self-protection? Our fundamental and natural Right as human beings is to defend oneself. If some man wants to attempt to rape me, harm me, he will have to know that he may meet the barrel of my gun. The choice is his to make just as it is my choice to arm myself. I will never allow an ignorant Democrat to take away my ability to defend myself. Never.

  • detroit19

    Democraps…dangerously plan and simple idiots.

  • Bill Board

    The Democraps, Stockman speaks of, are probably the rapists.

  • CynicOwl

    Gun control: the theory that you’re better off dead in an alley with your pantyhose wrapped around your throat, than you are with a loaded gun in your purse.

  • MrApple

    Are Liberals really playing the pro-rapist card? Best of luck on that one.

  • KansasGirl

    If democRats don’t want to use a gun against a rapist, then don’t.
    The problem they’re going to have with me, is when they try to take away my right to carry.

  • amyshulk

    In the 70’s it was “get yourself an equalizer” now it’s “lie back and think of England” How far the “tolerant” ones have fallen!

  • Red Fred

    Poor idiots. Their idea of “rape” is a date who is too pushy. Real rape is VIOLENT. And we WILL use firearms to defend ourselves, and further, we don’t require your permission.

  • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

    Why do democrats believe that women don’t have 2nd Amendment rights? Last I checked women have all the same rights as men do in this country. If a man can shoot a perp so can a woman.

    Colorado really needs to purge it’s Califonicators.

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      #SchoolHouseRock #SufferingUntilSufferage #NinteenthAmendment #RightWard Jawamax 8<{D}

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      #SchoolHouseRock #SufferingUntilSufferage #NinteenthAmendment #RightWard Jawamax 8<{D}

  • Yankee_Doodler

    Dems hold that people shouldn’t be allowed to arm themselves against violent predators or tyrants. I admit, their argument kinda makes sense when you consider who the perps are likely to be.

    • Hanoverfist

      Puking, pissing, and crapping yourself is sure gonna stop a determine rapist.
      Chances are the perp will go from a rapist to a pissed off rapist and will kill you.

  • beebop1952

    But they LOVE Kermit Gosnell. Love that liberal non think double speak.

  • Robert Zornes

    No problem. give the gun to me and I can assure you that the rapist will last as long as a Montagnard torturing a Viet Cong with death by a thousands cuts.

    This animal could only HOPE to be put out of his misery by a woman.

    It seems to me that these anti- self-defense folks need a taste of what they think they know about so they can have an objective opinion.
    And these asshats breed ….

  • http://www.facebook.com/richard.jefferies.96 Richard Jefferies

    Please put a link to your website with the recorded calls.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Who called? Union of Rapists, AFL-CIO?

    Not only will shooting a rapist prevent THAT rape, but all the others that he/she would have committed in the future.

    Shoot them all, and let God sort it out.

  • mike_in_kosovo

    Things you have to believe to support gun control:

    http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?id=173

  • greenLibertarian

    Totally insane. Men and women should be able to blow away would-be rapists.

  • Jeremy

    The real war on women by liberals rages on.

  • John Taznar

    So now Dems are telling us date rapists aren’t real rapists?

  • teamfrazzled

    What a bizarre mentality to believe a raped woman is morally superior to one who defended herself from attack.

  • CasualMeyhem

    Is that S.E. Cupp? Anyway, hell yes arm the women! An armed society is a polite society, and I am pro-manners!

  • Indyx57

    We wouldn’t want to lose Bill Clinton…. would we?

  • JubaDoobai!

    How about Democrats refusing to buy guns and ammunition, surrendering all the guns and ammunition that they have, and leaving the rest of us alone to buy guns and ammunition to defend ourselves?

    Oh, wait! I forgot! It’s Democrats we are talking about. Is their job to tell us what is bad for us even as they use the thing for the same reason we want it,

  • sevenbrokenbricks

    You know, I’d been telling people of that mindset to shut up before they get someone killed for a while, but I never thought it was this literal.

    Go dems. Show us exactly why we need these weapons – because you are the ultimate threat.

  • Ken Alan Draper

    funny how NOW is silent on this.

    • Misanthrope

      NOW is part of this. If women can take care of themselves, why would they need NOW?

  • Ken Alan Draper

    funny how NOW is silent on this.

  • The_Questman

    From killing babies, Political targeting of conservatives, the constitution, rule of law, The Truth… all of these things and more are taken lightly by liberals. Their attitude is why should a Democratic voter die just because he wants to have sex and the woman doesn’t. She should get over it by supporting him while he enjoys his drug habit and if he beats her up once in a while, no big deal. She can always take the morning after pill or get an abortion if she get raped… Really, it’s no Big Deal.

  • Paul E. Gibbs Jr.

    All Democrats has been trying to degrade women foe years, they are probably the one rapping the women, and don’t want to get shot. Every person should have at least a pistol, shotgun, high powered rifle in their house, and even in a holsterr on their hip.

  • Paul E. Gibbs Jr.

    All Democrats has been trying to degrade women foe years, they are probably the one rapping the women, and don’t want to get shot. Every person should have at least a pistol, shotgun, high powered rifle in their house, and even in a holsterr on their hip.

  • Ken Alan Draper

    those libs better be careful Karma is a B*tch.

  • kim

    all women should be forced to carry rape protection kits… whistle, vomit bags, joke book, menstrual accessories, health card verifying STD, and visine for quik tears.

  • kim

    And let’s not forget to instruct them on how to pleasantly ask their attacker to leave

  • huecityvet1968

    I don’t care what any politically correct ass bites says. Both my adult daughters have CCW’s. They are both excellent shots and no matter what these brain dead politicians say, my girls are not going to get raped.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Rapists are part of the LIV demographic that Democrats rely on to get elected.
    So Democrats gotta represent!!!!!

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Democrats still haven’t figured out that when you take the tact of being “against” everything the Republicans stand for, you wind up being “for” some pretty f&^%$ed-up $hit.

  • Karl Winrich

    When it comes to carrying a gun and defending yourself against an assailant there’s 1 simple little rule:

    It’s better to be carrying 6 than to be carried by 12.