White House Kept Biden's Plan to Abandon Israel Out of the Readout of...
San Francisco to Hand Out Free Shots of Vodka to Homeless Alcoholics
J.K. Rowling Celebrates the Progress a Transgender Football Manager Represents, As Only Sh...
Where are the 'KIDS IN CAGES' Democrats Hyperventilating Over Mass. Gov's Plan to...
'The Look on Nancy Pelosi's Face Is Worth the Time' to Watch Her...
DNC, Biden WH Already Searching for Excuses to Make the Dem Convention as...
Trump Torpedoes Report About Who He's Considering for Running Mate With 1 Sentence
Biden WH WON'T Like CNN's Explanation for 'Why Trump Is in a MUCH...
AGAIN!? Ron DeSantis 'Needs to Make Gavin Newsom a New Poop Map'
Is Bidenomics Bringing Back the Hamburglar? McDonald's May Offer a Five Dollar Meal...
'MERICA: Man Gives Local Government Creative Finger Over Boat Fence Mandate
Newsom-Appointed Regulators OK Change to Utility Billing That Makes Responsible Users PAY...
POPCORN TIME: DNC Prepares for Major Protests at Chicago Convention, Without Help of...
Antisemites in the UK's National Union of Students Have Expelled Union of Jewish...
Octogenarian Enviro-Nut 'Just Stop Oil' Members Attack LITERAL Foundations of Democracy in...

Chelsea Clinton (accidentally?) RIPS the Obama administration over EPA and lead

This could be the best tweet yet from Chelsea Clinton yet, but we’re not sure she knows it as she’s actually criticizing the Obama administration and not that of President Trump.

Advertisement

Here she is responding to a tweet from STAT News reporting on an “internal memo” that shows the EPA “sidestepped [a] decision to tighten lead levels.” Sound bad, right? Like something Trump’s team would order?

Chelsea called the EPA’s actions “disappointing” and “dangerous”:

And she got all super-sciency and thinks it’s important to “call out” those who aren’t in favor “a science-based and public health-focused EPA”:

But is she aware of whose EPA she’s criticizing? Remember, kids — always click on the link:

But in the final days of the Obama administration, the EPA instead issued an internal memo — obtained by STAT — that sidestepped the issue of a specific new threshold for acceptable lead levels. The agency provided only general guidance on the factors that should be used when determining whether cleanups are required. It did not, however, lower the threshold for soil cleanup to one that would translate into a blood level of 5 micrograms per deciliter, down from the current level of 10, as was expected.

The memo shocked outside experts and even some EPA officials, who privately expressed alarm about the issue.

“The fact remains that 10 is worse than five,” said Dr. David Bellinger, a Harvard Medical School professor who has served as an EPA adviser and who has studied the effects of lead on children. “There’s scientific medical consensus that adverse effects are occurring at level 5 or below. The cleanup target ought to be health-based, and based on the most current scientific information. There’s a lot of wiggle room left here.”

Advertisement

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement