Biden Told Howard Stern About Women Mailing Him 'Very Salacious Pictures' (and Other...
WOOF! First Joke/Story of The Onion's Ben Collins Era Drops and It's Even...
California Mayor Attacked on Camera During Interview Promoting His City
New York Post: Anita Dunn Tried to Oust Worst Press Secretary in History,...
Biden Campaign's Warning to Media About WH Correspondents' Dinner Should Be in a...
Our Own Coucy Sets Students' FREE PALESTINE Dance Video to Various Songs and...
WaPo Columnist's Big GOTCHA Defending Pro-Hamas Campus Protesters Terrorizing Jewish Stude...
KARMA, That You? Check Out This List of California Politicians REAPING What Their...
Columbia Protest Leader's Statement/Backpedal After Saying Jews Don't Deserve to Live a Le...
WH Aides Reportedly Have a Solution to Troubling Optic of Biden Shuffling Alone...
Who Team Biden Is Bringing in to 'Tell the President's Story' at the...
WATCH: Columbia Student Protest Leader Says Israel Supporters 'Don't Deserve to Live'
It was the RUSSIANS, Adam! Adam Schiff ROBBED in San Francisco and What...
Maybe the Supreme Court Should ‘Take a Walk:’ A Deep Dive Into Thursday’s...
President Biden's Commencement Speech at Morehouse Proving Problematic

Charles C.W. Cooke busts Mother Jones for 'Underwear Gnomes' type headline on guns

There’s an old episode of “South Park” where the kids encounter “Underpants Gnomes” who have a scheme to get rich. Phase 1 of the plan is that the gnomes steal underpants. Phase 2 is blank. But Phase 3 is profit. Simple, right? Well, as long as don’t worry too much about what exactly happened in Phase 2 to make Phase 3 possible:

Advertisement

Well, some Underpants Gnomes seem to be writing headlines for Mother Jones. Notice how there’s a huge gap between these two sentences?

That’s because Phase 2, in this case, was an ill-advised lawsuit against the gun dealer, as National Review Online’s Charles C.W. Cooke so rightly points out:

Anger should be directed at the attorney that let her file the lawsuit knowing that this outcome was most likely. From Mother Jones:

There was one experience that showed us, more than any other, how warped America’s relationship with gun violence is. It came when we decided to sue the dealer that armed our daughter’s killer. The gunman bought more than 4,000 rounds of ammunition before his shooting spree—no background check, no questions asked. But a judge dismissed our case. Gun dealers are shielded by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, a controversial law that protects them from liability when crimes are committed with their products.

No blame for the lawyers, or the Brady Campaign that put her up to it:

Advertisement

Even some anti-gun folks are objecting to the piece:

https://twitter.com/alexgould17/status/888115491163611138

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement