80-Year-Old Palestinian Woman With Bottle of Water on Her Head Tells the IDF...
NPR Media Analyst Recommends George Conway's Anti-Trump Piece in The Atlantic
President Biden's Gaza Pier Project 'Moves Into Hamas Line of Fire'
NIH Official Says He Knows 'How to Make Emails Disappear' After a FOIA...
The Bulwark's Mona Charen Goes to Bat for David French After Panel Cancellation
Comcast Would Like to Remind You That Mother Nature Is Gender Fluid
House Judiciary Committee Holds Merrick Garland in Contempt for Not Turning Over Audio...
Biden and Kamala AKA Cheech and Ding Dong Announce Marijuana Reclassification
Jeremy Clarkson IS the UK's Sexiest Man and Everyone Knows It
Guess Who the BBC Suggests to Fill Train Driver Shortage After Lamenting They're...
WATCH: Anderson Cooper Says ‘Michael Cohen Was Cornered in What Appeared to Be...
Karine Jean-Pierre Has No Comment on Potential Terror Attack at Marine Corps Base
Keith Olbermann Shockingly Calls Out His Ex Katy Tur in a MESSY...
Our Gender Is NOT Fluid: U of Wyoming Sorority Won't Define 'Woman' in...
NFL Officially Distances Itself From Harrison Butker’s Commencement Speech

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement