LOL! Look who NYT turned to for 'authoritative comment on #FakeNews'

Talk about “fake news” continues to be all the rage, and the New York Times is on it:

"Fake News," an always-imprecise term that has lost meaning. Via @jwpetersNYT https://t.co/ACXGoPnPyV

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) December 26, 2016

The article contains some expert “fake news” analysis from a totally unbiased source:

Respectfully this article lost some meaning by going to a David Brock org for an authoritative comment on fake news. pic.twitter.com/gjc3lZOA88

— Jimmy (@JimmyPrinceton) December 26, 2016

https://twitter.com/216Patrick/status/813379887906033664
https://twitter.com/Me_In_Jersey/status/813387698496864256

Nothing “objectivity” like Media Matters!

this only proves how out of touch they are.

— Hair (@SHannitysHair) December 26, 2016

@redsteeze @maggieNYT @jwpetersNYT MMFA "polices the news media for bias." Is that what they call it?

— The Gentleman Masher (@GentlemanMashr) December 26, 2016

Only generous explanation is they have never actually read @mmfa. @kris_kinder @maggieNYT @jwpetersNYT

— William Belcher (@EdB_Ohio) December 26, 2016