'Until WE Don't Tolerate It ANY MORE ...' James Woods Goes STRAIGHT-FAFO About...
'They've Got Nothing Else': MSNBC's Joe Scarborough Explains What'll Happen If You Vote...
Jen Psaki Forced to Admit AND Correct BLATANT, Shameful Lie She Told to...
Who DID This?! Voice Over of VCU Students Bailing on Graduation As Gov....
Biden's Mother's Day Messages Reeked of Desperation, Projection and Shamelessness
WOOF! Jonathan Chait Spirals Into CRINGE Rant After J.K. Rowling WHOOPS Him for...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
LOL: Princeton Protesters MOCKED After Announcing 'Rotary Hunger Strikes'
Pronoun Pushback: Jonathan Chait Plays the 'Basic Decency' Card on J.K. Rowling
Sen. Mike Lee: 'Current Law Makes It Easy for Non-Citizens to Vote in...
NJ Dem Congresswoman Who Told Trump He's NOT Welcome TRIPS Gloriously Over His...
We Could Watch MeidasTouch Cry All Day EVERY Day Whine-Quoting Trump But THIS...
Climate-Change NOB Openly Calling for Virus to Cull Human Population FLIPS OUT When...
OMG-LOL, They Really Did It! Canadian School Does the Norm McDonald Tweet annnd...
HAAAA! Don't Look Now, But Elon Musk Just ENDED the Fed With One...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement