CNN Legal Analyst Says Latest Minneapolis ICE Shooting Video Doesn’t Support Self-Defense...
Fanning the Flames: AOC Lies That JD Vance Supports ICE Agents Assassinating Americans...
Why Is the Western Legacy Media Ignoring Iran? A Rhetorical Question
Terrifying Road Risk: Over Half of North Carolina's Immigrant Trucker Licenses Ruled Illeg...
Democrats' New Low: Doctored Clip Turns Violent Car Attack on ICE Officer into...
Shouting F-Bombs at ICE Didn't Work: Minneapolis Gets 1,000 Extra Border Patrol as...
Jesus Loves Them, But Someone Needs to Arrest These Insane Women Impeding ICE
Nebraska State Senator Says She 'Didn't Look' While Tearing Down Founders' Portraits –...
Jon Favreau's Eyeballs Have Officially Ghosted Him As He Misses the ICE Officer...
MS NOW Reporter Asks Why ICE Officer Was Filming After New Video Busts...
Karening Intensifies: Deranged Activism: Woman Abandons Young Child in Car to Interfere wi...
Sounds Like Sedition: Philadelphia Sheriff Claims ICE Is Not 'Real' Law Enforcement, Promi...
Code Pink's New MVP: MTG – She Didn't Just Recommend the Restaurant ......
Jack Smith Trampled Trump's First Amendment Rights... Says the Washington Post?! Wait, WHA...
Woke Losers Infighting Over Renee Good: 'Say Her Name' Forbidden Because White Allies...

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein cautions against anonymous sources in bizarre, strange, curious statement

Whatever it is that’s going on right now — a criminal investigation of President Trump for obstruction of justice, perhaps — took an interesting twist when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein issued a statement Thursday night cautioning Americans against stories attributed to anonymous officials … which would include just about every story published since January or so.

Advertisement

The very best part of the statement, though, was the way it managed to send journalists searching for that perfect word to describe it. What could Rosenstein mean, “be skeptical about anonymous allegations”?

Advertisement

That makes two votes for “bizarre,” one for “curious,” one for “interesting,” two for “strange,” one for “odd” … and add a late entry for “super odd.”

This is weird … all of the usual suspects are wondering why Rosenstein would issue a caution about believing anonymous sources. Which reporter is getting ready to drop tomorrow’s anonymously sourced 5 p.m. bombshell and isn’t telling?

https://twitter.com/celestemc/status/875530186799939584

https://twitter.com/Leadback_/status/875528389909659648

We’ll have to see. As strange as the statement might seem, it’s nice that there was a name attached to it in case anyone has questions.

Advertisement

 

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement