Sen. Ed Markey Triggered by USA Today's Scoop on 'White Nationalist Flag'
JD Vance Owes Vanity Fair Photographer $1,000 After Marco Rubio Posts New Profile...
Kamala Harris Says She and Biden Didn’t Release Epstein Files to Avoid Appearance...
Based on These Congressional Numbers From CNN the Dems Should DEFINITELY Keep Up...
Poor Choice of Words, Dave. LOL! David Axelrod Says AOC Has Something You...
No Monopoly on Grift: Haitians Give Somalis a Run for Their (Stolen) Money...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Innocent People DON'T Do This --> Whistleblowers Blow the Whistle AGAIN on Tim...
City in England Installs HVMs (Guess What That Stands for) in Effort to...
REALLY? Jon Karl Can't Remember a Primetime Presidential Speech That Was Hyperpartisan As...
Soros-Backed DA Drops Charges on Alleged Attempted Killer—He 'Finishes the Job' 24 Hours...
CNN Was Forced to Report Trump's Inflation Win, and It Was Glorious
NEWLY Released Radio Transmissions Show LEO Gave Brown University Shooter Lots of Time...
Chuck Schumer's Predictable Spin on Trump's Speech Gets Reality Nuked and Ratioed
Journo Claiming His Rent 'Went Up 24% Under Trump' BOLTS After Richard Grenell...

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein cautions against anonymous sources in bizarre, strange, curious statement

Whatever it is that’s going on right now — a criminal investigation of President Trump for obstruction of justice, perhaps — took an interesting twist when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein issued a statement Thursday night cautioning Americans against stories attributed to anonymous officials … which would include just about every story published since January or so.

Advertisement

The very best part of the statement, though, was the way it managed to send journalists searching for that perfect word to describe it. What could Rosenstein mean, “be skeptical about anonymous allegations”?

Advertisement

That makes two votes for “bizarre,” one for “curious,” one for “interesting,” two for “strange,” one for “odd” … and add a late entry for “super odd.”

This is weird … all of the usual suspects are wondering why Rosenstein would issue a caution about believing anonymous sources. Which reporter is getting ready to drop tomorrow’s anonymously sourced 5 p.m. bombshell and isn’t telling?

https://twitter.com/celestemc/status/875530186799939584

https://twitter.com/Leadback_/status/875528389909659648

We’ll have to see. As strange as the statement might seem, it’s nice that there was a name attached to it in case anyone has questions.

Advertisement

 

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement