CNN’s Jake Tapper Enlists Doctor Who Was Wrong About Biden to Diagnose Trump’s...
Delusional Democrat Claims Deporting Illegal Aliens Makes ALL Americans Less Safe
Dem Chuck Schumer Warns That the Legacy Media Is Consolidating Behind Trump
NASCAR Drivers, Fans, and North Carolinians Mourn the Tragic Deaths of Greg Biffle...
Palisades Reservoir Empty Just as Santa Ana Winds Season Begins
Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan Found Guilty of Felony Obstruction for Helping Illegal Alien...
Desperate Dem Blunder: Esther Kim Varet's Crockett Endorsement Features ... Not Crockett
CBS News: ‘Fraud Tourists’ Told Minnesota State Programs Were a Good Opportunity to...
From Saint Nicholas to Scolding: Teen Activist's Anti-Santa Post Divides Christian Twitter
BREAKING: Suspected Brown University Shooter Found Dead From Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wound
Keir Starmer Weighs in on Program to Save Boys From the Influence of...
San Francisco Board Votes to Establish a Reparations Fund
San Diego Schools Announce ‘More Choices Than Ever’ for Gender Identity
Eric Adams Fires Back at Harris Camp Over Hypocrisy in Prosecutions vs. Massive...
WaPo: American Academy of Pediatrics Loses Funding After Criticizing RFK Jr

Crowdsourcing is cool again, and you can join the fun of verifying donors to Trump's inaugural

Crowdsourcing? That’s a name we haven’t heard around these parts since 2011 or so, when the New York Times sent an open invitation to readers to spend the weekend helping sift through more than 24,000 of Sarah Palin’s emails in search of juicy dirt.

Advertisement

If we remember correctly, that fishing expedition turned out to be a bit of a bust, which might explain why the mainstream media seemed to sour on crowdsourcing — taking a hard pass, for example, on having readers scour a dump of some 30,000 “lost” emails from former IRS official Lois Lerner, which then turned up on hundreds of disaster recovery tapes.

Just like fact-checking, crowdsourcing is now cool again, and the Huffington Post is thrilled to have hundreds of volunteer muckrakers busily verifying donors to President Trump’s inaugural. Really, it’s a party atmosphere out there the likes of which hasn’t been seen since those pussy hat knitting bees.

Advertisement

But seriously folks, we don’t have a problem with a news outlet attempting to verify donors — its what reporters are supposed to do, right? And there does seem to be reason for suspicion.

The thing is, we’re old enough to remember the last few months, when just about every major paper and news site announced the new crack investigative team it had assembled to monitor the Trump administration. Maybe they could do the heavy lifting?

Let’s see how things are going so far:

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Pamela_M072/status/855139722603012096

Nailed it.

Advertisement

BOMBSHELL.

Essentially, if your name is any combination of John and Isabel and your phone rings a lot this weekend, now you know why.

Volunteering sounds good, but what happened to the $15 an hour living wage?

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement