Woman Says There Should Be a Law That All Trump Voters Wear a...
NBC News: Survey Says 82% of Trans Employees Suffered Harassment at Work
My Way or the Deportation Highway: Nancy Sinatra Forgets Dad’s Real America
Patty Murray: José Screams in Excruciating Pain As an ICE Vehicle Allegedly Runs...
DOJ Accused of Politicizing Multiple Sex Offender's Case to Harm Somali Community
SNAP Showdown: Dems Cry 'Privacy' While Handing Voter Data to Leftist Orgs—Hypocrisy Alert
BREAKING: WaPo Catches Us Up on What Rosie O’Donnell Has Been Up To
X Fined: President of European Commission Tells of the Importance of 'Pre-Bunking' Speech
Sen. Chris Murphy, Ben Crump Pounce on CBS News Story About Police 'Totalitarianism'
Mt. Rushmore Ratio: ‘Wrong to deface OUR Mountain’ ... You Took It From...
We Now Join James Carville’s ‘The Walls Are Closing In’ Episode #5,841 Already...
Parents Broke the Law, Kids Don’t Get the Prize: The Sopranos Analogy Jesse...
Sadiq CAN'T: London's Donated Christmas Tree Is an Insult That Would Embarrass Even...
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Is Begging for His Democrat Party’s Somali Fraud Scandal...
Man Stabbed in the Chest on Charlotte Light Rail by Illegal Alien

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement