Is Michael Jordan Trolling You? MJ Has a Secret X Account to Rage-Bait...
Tim Walz's Attempted 'Release the Files' Dunk on Trump/DOJ Was a Self-Awareness Faceplant...
Scott Jennings Revisits CNN Clash With Dem Attorney Wildly Wrong About Judge Hannah...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Jim Acosta Reports Outside the Trump-Kennedy Center but Will NEVER Call It That...
U.S. Retaliates Against ISIS in Syria With Massive Airstrikes
Maria Shriver Gets a Lesson on 'Dignity' After Whining About the Trump-Kennedy Center
Buffet of Fresh News Breaking in Minnesota, Legacy Media is Reheating Leftovers From...
This Is the Way! Erika Kirk Rises Above the Hate, Trolls Joy Reid...
'PANIC MODE'! Tim Walz Says Trump's Weaponizing Federal Gov't Against MN Just Because...
Three Is a Tragic Number: WSJ Hits Bottom With ‘Throuple Trouble’ Interior Design...
Star Tribune's Previous Attempt to Debunk Trump's Claim About Scope of MN Fraud...
Vance Dance: MAGA Embraces White House ‘Soul Train’ AI Parody Video Being Shared...
Dems Rage After Woke Trans Surgeries Targeted by Trump Administration
JK Rowling TROUNCES Labour Party for Claiming to Protect Women... While Removing Their...

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement