One thing about the FBI raiding Trump’s home is very clear.
Oh, wait, our bad … Obama bro David Axelrod said something different. Try not to laugh too hard when you read it.
One thing is very clear.
Garland would not have authorized this raid, and no federal judge would have signed off on it, if there weren't significant evidence to warrant it.— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) August 8, 2022
Does David know David is a Democrat? Does David realize the Left has been abusing our most basic fundamental institutions to target Trump for the past six years now? SIX YEARS! And they have yet to find anything on the former president that will ‘finish him’.
Even though lawn flamingos like Adam Schiff keep SWEARING they have the evidence that will end Trump THIS TIME!
Mary Katharine Ham took David and his pals at the FBI to task as only she can. You can’t help but smile when you read her decimating these people because you know she’s smiling and being polite the entire time.
One thing is very clear.
The FBI would not have requested surveillance of an American citizen, and FISA would not have authorized it, if there weren’t very significant evidence to warrant it. https://t.co/tbNZYlnbI2
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) August 9, 2022
Oooh, we see what she did here.
Remember when the FBI used the fake Steele Dossier … we do.
Let’s shoot for more solid than Crossfire Hurricane this time, huh, guys?
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) August 9, 2022
Yeah, guys. That’s not too much to ask.
I know the coma over Russiagate misconduct from feds is self-imposed and very deep, but my Lord, people. There is very recent evidence that using federal law enforcement’s supposed infallibility (instead of actual evidence) to justify its actions is not the circular logic we need
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) August 9, 2022
What she said.
All day, every day.
***
Related:
Related:
***
Join the conversation as a VIP Member