Wait. Did Obama's Department of Justice, including James Comey and Andrew McCabe, protect the Clinton Foundation?
SAY IT AIN'T SO.
His administration was honest and lawful... we simply do not believe they would ever be so corrupt.
Ha.
HA ha.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
Ok, you guys knew that was coming; we can only be so braindead writing something for so long before we break and have to laugh at ourselves.
Check this out:
BREAKING: The corrupt Obama DOJ, including James Comey and Andrew McCabe, explicitly blocked efforts to criminally investigate the Clinton Foundation in 2016 because they did not “want to create any impression we are investigating the Clinton Foundation or the Clintons,”… pic.twitter.com/dM4nBE1avX
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) December 15, 2025
Post continues:
... according to new evidence released today by Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa.
Documents show that federal agents were blocked from issuing subpoenas about the Clinton Foundation or conducting interviews with or about the Clintons in order to protect them from scrutiny during the 2016 election. At the same time, the Obama FBI was using the bogus, Clinton-funded dossier as pretext for illegally spying on the Trump campaign.
Remember how often Obama would brag about how there were no scandals connected to his administration? Yeah, about that. *eye roll*
We can't investigate the Clintons because we can't be seen to be investigating the Clintons?
— CowLivesMatter (@ProtesterLone) December 15, 2025
Weird, right?
We assume this is government speak for, 'We're covering our own backside because we have some shady connections to the Clinton Foundation,' but you know, that's just a guess.
Recommended
Obstructing the Department of Justice is a crime, but not if done within?
— BocaDuke (@BocaDuk3) December 15, 2025
It's good to be a Democrat.
And they claimed no one was above the law.
— Michael Hill (@Michael21596072) December 15, 2025
Ironic, ain't it?
Swamp critters defending swamp critters. https://t.co/wu7b0WED87
— Ray Sawhill (@raysawhill) December 15, 2025
Something like that.
============================================================
Related:
============================================================
