You know the media are a total and complete mess when writers start contradicting their own outlets to promote false narratives.
Thread on Politico/Fusion Natasha’s denial of Politico’s own reported facts to promote false narratives. https://t.co/nDG50RZXJq
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 11, 2019
This thread from Tim Pool is priceless, especially considering he’s probably one of the least biased media types you’ll find on Twitter.
Hahahahahaha, ok ok Im so done
These people are insane
Journalism is dead
cc @politico @NatashaBertrand @kenvogel
You guys can duke it out pic.twitter.com/6NvyH8ynKS
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!
Why is it we can’t get the scene from Godzilla where he says, ‘Let them fight,’ out of our heads?
Heh.
So lets break down the semantic debate
Natasha writes that they think Ukraine conspired with the Clinton Campaign and the DNC
Vogel writes that Ukraine's government was involved in sharing dirt with a DNC Consultant
So Yes, evidence DOES exist to "support" that idea
2/
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
But you know, orange man bad or something.
The way Natasha characterizes what the conspiracy is gives them plausible deniability
"oh no we KNOW Ukraine did this, but we meant that they thought it was DIRECTLY with Clinton's campaign"
3/
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
Recommended
Don’t look at us, man, we dunno.
We just work here.
More for good measure
What we know according to Politico
Ukraine was feeding info to a DNC consultant to hurt Trump and boost Clinton
The story was corroborated in May of 2019https://t.co/KdiEl60dYZ pic.twitter.com/mdK3G0aCEk
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
This is all such a freakin’ disaster.
Essentially if you read in Politico and The HIll that a DNC consultant was working with Ukranian officials to hurt Trump it stands to reason that evidence exists to support the idea the the DNC and Clinton's campaign from the top was involved
Support does not mean prove
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
Support does not even mean prove beyond a reasonable doubt
I'd say the Politico story from 2017 provides probable cause to investigate, which is exactly what Giuliani is doing
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
Womp womp womp, Democrats.
Wonder if this is why Schiff’s eyes seem to be bugging out of his pointy little head more than usual.
If you trust media like Democrats tend to you will go insanehttps://t.co/TNmTluxiTW
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 11, 2019
Ok, so what if you cover the media for a living … will that make you go insane because if so that would explain SO MUCH.
Not a great look, POLITICO.
Related: