'Is That a Joke?' Biden Asked If He or Trump Should Get Credit...
'Pure Savage!' GOP Rep Uses His Phone to Test Witness' Claim SSA Telework...
Ivy Beleaguered: J.D. Vance HUMILIATES Yale Professor Who Claims Pete Hegseth Will Destroy...
RFK Jr.'s Warning Heeded - FDA to Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3...
The Stupid, It BURNS! Lefty Attacks Homeschooling, Proves HE'S the Dim Bulb Instead
Corrupt to the Core: Stacey Abrams Nonprofit Led by Ralph Warnock Admitted to...
DeSantis Takes Charge: Florida Gov Leads Charge with Groundbreaking Proposal to Back Trump...
BRUTAL: Adam Schiff Tried to Play the Part of Liz Cheney's Lawyer and...
The Party of Women! Rep. Pramila Jayapal Explains Why She Voted to Harm...
Pam Bondi Is Destroying Democrat Senators! They've Got Nothing!
Pam Bondi Helps Dem Sen. Mazie Hirono Make a Fool of Herself at...
Donald Trump Is Ready to Fight. So Are We.
Nice Try ... Dick: Pam Bondi BURIES Sen. Durbin Trying to Play 'Gotcha'...
Pam Bondi Delivers a Self-Awareness KO to Sen. Whitehouse About How the Justice...
Chuck Grassley Nukes Dem Concerns That Pam Bondi Would Weaponize the Justice Department

Don't look now, but the Roger Stone story just got worse for the DOJ. A whole LOT WORSE!

Oh, man. . .

The Roger Stone story just got a whole lot more BONKERS:

Advertisement

Apparently, the foreperson of the jury that convicted Roger Stone wrote an op-ed for CNN which then led to people finding her social media activity, and BAM:

More from Mike Cernovich:

Here’s the CNN article where she outed herself:

She also ran for Congress in 2012:

Advertisement

So, how the eff did this get missed by Stone’s lawyers? Did she lie on her jury questionnaire?

She was also tweeting during the case:

It’s going to get messay AF:

It looks like Stone has already asked for a retrial, but has been denied:

Advertisement

More from the Examiner:

According to the judge’s ruling, unsealed on Wednesday afternoon, Stone’s argument that a new trial was warranted hinged on two main claims about why the juror, whose identity was concealed in the filing, should have been removed. The first was because the juror is employed at a division of the Internal Revenue Service, which Stone claimed “works hand-in-hand with the Department of Justice prosecuting criminal tax matters.” The second was because Stone claimed the juror “violated the court’s order to avoid media coverage of the case.”

The judge rejected both of these claims, arguing that Stone’s defense team “has not presented grounds for a new trial” under the appropriate rules nor shown “any reason to believe there has been a serious miscarriage of justice.”

To be continued. . .

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement