Even More BIZARRE: Tucker Carlson Goes on Paranoid, INSANE Rant About Israel 'Creating'...
Taxpayers Weigh in After Kathy Hochul Brags About How Much NY Is Spending...
Gets WORSE: Techno Fog Shares Most DAMNING Receipts yet of Former SPLC CFO's...
Under a Big ‘W?’: It’s a Mad World As WNBA Meeting Ends With...
Ilhan Omar Has INSISTED She's NOT Under Investigation BUT This Post Kinda Sorta...
MAGA Conspiracy! Jim Acosta Explains Why His Swipe at Karoline Leavitt Isn't Really...
What Gives?! Francesca Hong Was ON TRACK to Win ... So What Really...
WHOA: New BOMBSHELL Shows Maine Dem Troy Jackson Is Just As Bad (if...
WSJ Pours Cold Water on TDS Crowd's 'OMG Trump Used Reporters As Decoys'...
CNN SHREDDED for Leaving This Key Point OUT of Horrific Story About Black...
Chris Cuomo Praises ‘Rebranded’ AOC for Keeping Her Principles While Changing Political Po...
Homeless Hero?: Elizabeth Warren Wonders If Spider-Man Can Afford a Place to Live...
Extreme Makeover: DSA Darling AOC Begins Rebranding Campaign to Convince Voters She’s a...
Buzz Patterson Shares an Open Letter to Press Explaining Why Operations Are Classified
The Economist Outs Paw Patrol As Gender-Normative Pro-Police Propaganda

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement