Excruciating! Georgia Chief Justice DESTROYS Attorney Over Citing Non-Existent Cases (and...
'Polling on This Must Be Brutal': Even the MSM Isn't Cooperating With the...
Jake Tapper's New Broadcast Office Decor Is TOTALLY Not a Metaphor for CNN
Cynical Publius Reveals Trump's Greatest Superpower, Courtesy of Anne Applebaum and The At...
Jim Acosta Warns That 'Partisan Hacks' Will Take Over CNN Due to Paramount/Warner...
CNN’s Solution to Low Ratings Is Enormous Mics for Anderson Cooper and Office...
'Politics May Overshadow His Legacy': Variety's Chuck Norris Headline Gets Ratio'ed to the...
Hypocrites in Havana: Leftists Sing Celia Cruz's Guantanamera While Ignoring Her Exile by...
Don Lemon to Gavin Newsom: America Shoots Protesters Just Like Iran – No...
'People Are Starting to Notice': Viral Close-Up of Karoline Leavitt Triggers Outrage Cycle...
Internal Polling Come Out? Senate Dems Are Lying Even Harder About Blame for...
Defiant Statement from Invisible Iranian Supreme Leader: Media Fails to Mention He Hasn't...
Ilhan Omar’s Nepo-Baby Princess Pilgrimages to Cuba to Cosplay as a Revolutionary...
They’re Not Even Hiding It Anymore: Pritzker Lays Out Dems Plan to Weaponize...
Japan's PM Checked Out the White House's Presidential Walk of Fame and Then...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement