WTF Are You Even SAYING? Keith Ellison Claims He Uses 'Gender-Affirming Care' Every...
Socialist Hypocrite Abdul El-Sayed Desperately Scrambles to Hide Wealth Until After Michi...
Let's Revisit the People Dems Trusted to Recruit and Vet Graham Platner (it...
Ilhan Omar Should Turn Her Replies on Because She's Getting Help Exposing Corruption
Tape Bombshell: Nebraska Senate Nominee Dan Osborn's Staffer Admits He Recruited Rape-Accu...
Q and A Time: John Fetterman Takes a 'P-Hustle' Victory Lap as the...
Iowahawkblog Annihilates Hasan Piker: Porky Trust-Fund Trotsky Dreams of Revolution
Dems Who Backed Platner No Matter What Now Whining About Him Being Bad...
US Soccer Star Killed by Uzbek Diversity Visa Semi Driver Who Couldn’t Speak...
Hasan Piker’s Selective Amnesia: 'I Never Supported Graham Platner' (Except When He Clearl...
Dem Sen. Mark Kelly's Warning About How Trump Might Try to 'Intimidate Voters'...
Where Was This Megyn? Sudden Plea for Compassion Toward Erika Kirk After Months...
Axios Notices Platner's Silver Spoon — Months After Conservatives Reported It, Now That...
Ro Khanna's Complaint About How Many People ICE Arrested Last Week Gets Ratioed...
Court Dispatch: Grieving Erika Kirk Comforts Crying Stranger With a Tissue as Candace...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos