MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin’s Reaction to Dem’s Trump Hoax Photo Differs From Bill...
Clinton Spox (Hillary, Is That You?) Says Latest Batch of Epstein Pics Are...
President Trump Lowers Prescription Costs and Sends Warrior Dividends to the Troops
60 Minutes' Promo About Where ICE Sent These Deported Illegals Fails to Garner...
Carol Roth Lets These 2 Super Rich Guys Know How to Alleviate Their...
Is Michael Jordan Trolling You? MJ Has a Secret X Account to Rage-Bait...
Tim Walz's Attempted 'Release the Files' Dunk on Trump/DOJ Was a Self-Awareness Faceplant...
Scott Jennings Revisits CNN Clash With Dem Attorney Wildly Wrong About Judge Hannah...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Jim Acosta Reports Outside the Trump-Kennedy Center but Will NEVER Call It That...
U.S. Retaliates Against ISIS in Syria With Massive Airstrikes
Maria Shriver Gets a Lesson on 'Dignity' After Whining About the Trump-Kennedy Center
Buffet of Fresh News Breaking in Minnesota, Legacy Media is Reheating Leftovers From...
This Is the Way! Erika Kirk Rises Above the Hate, Trolls Joy Reid...
'PANIC MODE'! Tim Walz Says Trump's Weaponizing Federal Gov't Against MN Just Because...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement