Gavin Newsom Helpfully Just Made It More Clear Than Ever That He's Insane...
Joe Scarborough Blew His Big Interview With Abdul El-Sayed
You KNOW It's Getting Bad for El-Sayed When Even Morning Joe Is Calling...
NRSC Video Montage ENDS Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Twitch...
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham Taking Abdul El-Sayed APART for Ignorant Comment on...
Oh, HONEY: Lefty Phone Banker Roasted for Whining That Voters Keep Asking Her...
'Now We Know Why'! Scott Jennings Flashes Back to What Happened on CNN...
This Is RICH: Chuck Schumer’s PAC Drops Some SERIOUS Coin on Supposed Anti-Big-Money...
Trump's Second Term Will Never Survive the Latest Cringe-Worthy Celebrity 'Resistance' Vid...
Climate Exchange: AI Doomsayers Sound Just Like Climate Doomsayers
Hasan Holiday: Neera Tanden Wants Piker to Take a Hike but Appears Keen...
Naked Partisanship: Jen Psaki’s Fake Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney’s Nude Betting Ad Gets...
Zoinks!: Courtroom Sketch of Terror Suspect Has X Talking ‘Scooby Snacks’ and Making...
The Economy’s Dead? Somebody Better Tell Toys ‘R’ Us
Shame on You, Jarvis: Nancy Mace Tells Men to Stop Sending Her 'Nasty'...

Meteorologist Chris Martz Obliterates Adam Schiff's Climate Change Panic Button

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Many people looked at the landslide in Nepal recently and saw a tragedy, but others like Sen. Adam Schiff saw that horrific devastation and saw opportunity. 

Advertisement

Though recent polls have shown the issue of climate change to be nowhere near the top of the list of voters' concerns, instinct requires Democrats like Adam Schiff to keep trying to sound the alarm. Nothing they predict ever comes to fruition, but that's not about to stop Schiff-ty: 

Maybe Schiff hasn't gotten the memo. 

Schiff's post caught the attention of meteorologist Chris Martz, who had several things to add: 

Here's the rest of the post: 

First, a “100-year storm” means that an extreme weather event (let’s say, a flood) of some magnitude has a 1% chance of occurring at ONE specific location in any given year.

Assuming stationarity, if you have, let’s suppose, 10,000 different towns, it can be expected that 100 of those towns will experience a “100-year-flood” every year. This can be applied to forest fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, and blizzards too.

By definition, hundred-year storms are normal and always have been.

As for glaciers, well, they began receding long before mankind began pumping CO₂ into the atmosphere. So, not all of that is able to be blamed on our carbon sins.

I’d tell you to stick to politics, but you aren’t really good at that either because the U.S. is running a $40 trillion-dollar deficit.

Advertisement

Ouch! But he did have that coming. 

The Left's reaction to natural disasters is always "we need to spend a lot more taxpayer money so this doesn't happen again. Is there nothing that tax increases can't accomplish? 

*****

Editor's Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its globalist agenda and domestic lunacy and lies (looking at you, Schiff-ty). 

Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. Thank you!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement