Kamala and Kentaji: Former Dem VP Harris Says Supreme Court Justice Jackson’s Dissents...
Katie Couric Tells Jennifer Welch That Progressive ‘News’ Outlets Are Trying to Adhere...
Rosie O'Donnell Goes on Three Day Trump Blackout - Can She Make It?
Congressional Candidate: Don't Worry About School Sickness Because Man With Brain Worm Is...
Minnesota Judges Form Rock Band Despite Increase in Threats to Blow Off Steam
NEA Says We Should Refer to America as 'What We Now Call the...
OOF! The Body Language of Fani Willis's Lawyer Says EVERYTHING About Her
Priest Twists Gospels to Critique Travel Ban and Immigration Policy
Boston Globe Covers the 'ICE Tea Party' in Rebellion Against Trump's Immigration Policy
AG Keith Ellison Announces Settlement With Kia and Hyundai Over Car Thefts
Dan Bongino Leaving the FBI in January
WHAT Insider Trading? Time Lapse Graph of Nancy Pelosi's AMAZING Stock Trading Acumen...
Miles ‘Anonymous’ Taylor Putting Up Billboards That Would Make the Seditious Six Proud
Sen. Ed Markey Says Trump’s Travel Ban Is ‘Racism Disguised as Security’
Nearly $150,000 Raised for Elderly Employee Harassed at Target for Wearing a Charlie...

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement