Mark Sanford Jumps Back Into Politics: Because His Legacy of Embarrassing His Kids...
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Says 'It Is a Death Sentence' to Deport Anyone to...
Shri Thanedar’s ‘Sick Burn’ on Stephen Miller Backfires BIGLY — All of X...
Trans Journalist Who Keeps Getting Mistaken for Her Trans Colleague Has a Theory
WaPo: Government Could Lose Billions by Discouraging Illegals From ‘Engaging in the Tax...
'Janky America': Michelle Obama Unhappy Again Now That a Non-Obama Is President
Karoline Leavitt Reminds WH Reporter What a Joke Is When Questioned About Trump's...
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Passes Along Credible Reports of a 'Teen Trend' Forming
Zohran Mamdani's Straight-Up Giddy That It's 'Happy Tax Day' (Carol Roth Has a...
Adam Schiff Says He Wouldn’t Have Gone Near Swalwell With a Ten-Foot Pole...
Zohran Mamdani Is Extremely Disturbed by Violence Shown by NYPD and Will Open...
It Appears That Some People Are Poisoning Dogs in the UK (Gosh, Who...
Unhinged Dem Rep Calls for Trump to be 'Eliminated' From Office (Secret Service,...
Hailstorm Sends Wisconsin's Dem Secretary of State Into a Climate Change Meltdown (YIKES)
Was Swalwell Blackmailed to Push for a Wide Open Border?

CNN political reporter seems a bit too anxious to accuse Michael Flynn of bias against Muslims

We’re not saying the mainstream media is anxiously poised to pounce on anything and everything that President-elect Donald Trump does, but … actually, that’s exactly what we’re saying.

Advertisement

CNN on Tuesday afternoon posted a piece on retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Trump’s pick to be national security adviser, noting in its headline that Flynn in August called Islamism a “vicious cancer” that has to be “excised.”

That quote apparently struck CNN political reporter Sara Murray as worthy of repeating:

Sara Murray deleted tweet

Something went wrong in this game of telephone, though: Islam is world’s second largest religion; Islamism is not.

Credit Murray for acknowledging that she misinterpreted the headline. Flynn certainly isn’t beyond criticism, and his record deserves to be examined — but the media at large really needs to dial back the impulse to attack that characterized its pre-election campaign coverage.

Advertisement

We have to admit we’d be a little more anxious to read CNN’s coverage of “—isms” if we were certain its reporters knew what they were.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement