In a Blow to Digital Media, Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal in Publisher...
Multiple People Reported Shot in 'Active Shooter' Situation on Kentucky Interstate
Colorado Congressman Says Gang Activity is a Myth, But Residents Think He Must...
'Defiant' Deadbeat Dad's Bulletproof Brain Can't Grasp Why Trump Would Need a Protective...
City Council Shuts Down Meeting When Residents Complain About Haitian Migrants
Violent Venezuelan Gang Members Are EVERYWHERE: Latest Arrest Happened in Rural Wisconsin
Former LEO Val Demmings Can’t Believe FOP Would Endorse Trump
MSNBC Writes That Elon Musk's X Is a Poison and Everyone Needs to...
LOL: David Hogg Blames Dems' Failure to Demonstrate What Masculinity Looks Like for...
Washington Post Columnist Tells Us Exactly Which Spices Kamala Harris Just Bought
WUT?! NBC News Wants Us to Know Kamala Is Preparing for Trump to...
President Joe Biden Wishes He Could Put Trump in the Middle of Arizona
Insufferable Shrew Randi Weingarten DESTROYED for Praising Biden-Harris Over Women Going B...
Kamala Harris 'Honored' to Have Dick Cheney's Endorsement (Maybe THIS Helps Explain Why)
WATCH: Springfield, OH Woman Gives HEARTBREAKING Testimony About Trouble Haitian Immigrant...

ABC News fact-checks Sen. Josh Hawley's 'attacks' by noting that Kentanji Brown Jackson's lenient child porn sentences are 'mainstream'

We’ve already given you NBC News’ “fact-check” of Sen. Josh Hawley’s accusation that President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, has been lenient in sentencing child porn offenders, pretty much letting them “off the hook.” NBC’s fact-checkers noted that “it is not a radical view” that some sex offenders involving children have nonsexual motivations.

Advertisement

Now ABC News is up to bat with its “fact-check,” and they’ve really got Hawley in a corner now. They did some digging and found out that Hawley had previously voted to confirm judges who’ve also let sex offenders off easy … which just goes to confirm what Hawley said. ABC News’ Devin Dwyer concludes that these minimum or shorter sentences for child porn are “mainstream.”

Ah, “critical context.” Let’s hear it:

While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critical context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

“If and when we properly contextualize Judge Jackson’s sentencing record in federal child porn cases, it looks pretty mainstream,” wrote Doug Berman, a leading expert on sentencing law and policy at The Ohio State University School of Law.

So court records show just what Hawley said they showed. Hawley’s press secretary sent this out Monday:

Advertisement

Yeah, but that’s mainstream.

Advertisement

The problem here, as Dwyer puts it, is that Jackson’s confirmation hearings kick off with “a flurry of misleading allegations” by Hawley … even though his fact-check just said that Hawley was right.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement