Dem Ilhan Omar Says She’s ‘Exhausted’ by How Much Taxpayer Money Is Funding...
Dem Chris Murphy Calls ICE Agent’s Self-Defense in Minneapolis a ‘Most Heinous Act...
MS NOW Pushes Fake Narrative That Renee Gold’s Encounter With ICE Agents Was...
'From This Angle' - Hilarious Memes Take on The Minnesota ICE Incident
When Your DA Thinks He's in a Movie: Krasner's 'FAFO' Sunglasses Post Gives...
Brandi Kruse Exposes the Lie: No New 'Invasive Exams' Needed to Keep Girls'...
NYC's New Mayor Suddenly Hates Hamas... After Voters Ignored All the Red Flags
While Iran Bleeds – Hundreds Dead in Brutal Crackdown – American College Activists...
FAFO in Real Time: Man Points 'Gun' (It's His Phone) at Federal Officers,...
Now the Car Was Already MOVING? Ilhan Omar Tries Out a New Lie...
Juan Williams: 'The Record Shows the Big Bump in Premiums Is Due to...
What's a 'Hurder'? San Francisco Theater Kids Gather On the Beach for Cringe...
Porta-Potty Prince of NY: Mamdani Promises Free 'Modular Bathrooms' and What Could POSSIBL...
JK Rowling Shows Her Support for Smoking, Hot Iranian Woman Standing Up To...
Ted Lieu's Tough-Guy Letter to Oil Barons Goes HILARIOUSLY Off the Rails As...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement