Crying Woman Shaves Her Head to Protest Shooting of 'Renee Cook'
Apartment Manager Arrested for Voting Multiple Times by Filing Ballots for Former Tenants
Justice Alito Corners ACLU: 'What Is a Man or Woman?' — They Had...
Dashcam Video Shows Anti-ICE Agitator Being ‘Run Over’ by Police
OOPS! Joy Reid Says the Quiet Part Out Loud In Insanely Racist Rant...
Pete Hegseth's Response to Mark Kelly Whining About 'Finding Out' (After He Eff'd...
WHOA: Epstein Files MUST Be DAMNING for Bill and Hillary Clinton to Ditch...
CNN Pours Cold Water on Pathetic Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Chain-Wearing Skeeze I've Never Heard of Made the Dumbest Comparison Between ICE and...
Jessica Tarlov Jumps in the Renee Good DEBATE Because Gawd Knows She Can't...
People Magazine Allows Woke, Mouth-Breathing She/Her to Turn Scott Adams' Obit Into HATE-F...
Lollipop Guild Representative Robert Reich Gets Schooled on What a REAL Dictatorship Looks...
*SNORT* Zohran Mamdani Learns the Hard Way That ICE Doesn't GAF About Him...
Aww, Wassamatta, BUBBA? Bill Clinton Ghosts House Oversight Deposition (Does NOT Sound Goo...
'May He Rest in Eternal Glory and Peace': Scott Adams Has Passed Away...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement