Soulless: WaPo sinks to twisted new low with slobbering profile of Cecile Richards

@seanmdav @washingtonpost Intellectual dishonesty required

— KEK (@_uptoolate_) August 16, 2016

Who says pimping baby murder can’t be glamorous? Cecile Richards — with some help from the Washington Post — is out to prove the naysayers wrong:

https://twitter.com/iptuttle/status/765658425917337600

That’s right:

Style? pic.twitter.com/sBiBhoHJLf

— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) August 16, 2016

Let’s read more about Cecile Richards’ stylish self, shall we?

She is, as always, immaculately put together, her tall frame draped in a merlot-colored sheath and matching cardigan, gold earrings twinkling beneath her short, white-blond hair. Her alto voice conveys the subtlest hint of a Texas twang, and more than a hint of sarcasm.

…

In person, the 59-year-old Richards exudes both a warm authenticity and a subtle impenetrability; there’s the sense that she means everything she says, but she isn’t saying everything. Her public persona is almost preternaturally controlled; like the savviest politicians, she’s supremely polished, perpetually on-message and surrounded by a highly protective media operation that carefully controls reporters’ access and circles the wagons when uncomfortable situations arise.

By all means, read on for a full, fawning bio of the Pro-Abortion Queen. If you can stomach it, that is.

https://twitter.com/ErickaAndersen/status/765658661205180422

And looking fabulous is what matters, right?

GP Yes, she's responsible for slaughtering thousands of human lives each year, but with *style,* so it's OK, see? https://t.co/QTkWFaE89V

— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) August 16, 2016

Blending the topic of how stylish she is with the horror of abortion is disgusting.

— SheilaW (@SheLa9876) August 16, 2016

Recommended

Judd Legum Cites 'Experts' to Challenge DOGE Savings

Gordon K

Advertisement

"abortion movement" bolder than ever? Is this something to be proud of???

— Cult 45 (@theomark) August 16, 2016

She makes $600k a year off the deaths of innocent babies #CecileIsNoSaint

— micaiah bilger (@micaiah157) August 16, 2016

@iptuttle @PPact @CaitJGibson And proud of it. I can't comprehend anyone supporting sucking out baby's brains.

— Eddie Robbins (@eddierobbins) August 16, 2016

https://twitter.com/gtuttle/status/765612213914767360

Selling dead baby parts is pretty bold. And objectively evil.

— Andy Shanks (@andysnark) August 16, 2016

And speaking of evil:

https://twitter.com/iptuttle/status/765660510196994052

Nauseating. Absolutely nauseating.

@NRO @washingtonpost The uncrushed, unvacuumed face.

— John Tadian (@Tadianj) August 16, 2016

https://twitter.com/DaJSch/status/765662995666104320

https://twitter.com/molratty/status/765662525648048128

They couldn’t show the true face of abortion. It just wouldn’t be stylish, you know?