'Objectively'? This snippet from a WaPo piece on Hillary is 'perfectly wrong in all ways' [screenshot]

https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/732263989145567232

It’s cute when MSM outlets pretend to be unbiased:

Hahahahahaha @washingtonpost hahahahahahahttps://t.co/SR2S5PzpEw pic.twitter.com/l1s23eku1I

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) May 16, 2016

“Objectively offensive,” eh?

https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/732264541774594049

@kerpen @washingtonpost Also illustrates obvious grade inflation in HS and college English classes.

— Joseph Spiegel (@joedocbc) May 16, 2016

It is perfectly wrong in all ways. @SethAMandel @washingtonpost

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) May 16, 2016

Including this way:

https://twitter.com/jmj1961/status/732209472593088512

Let’s see it again:

@kerpen The Post should not be calling her "objectively offensive" in a news story. That is what it meant to do, right?

— Ramesh Ponnuru (@RameshPonnuru) May 16, 2016

Whoops!