Jeff Zucker, president of CNN Worldwide, said yesterday that CNN would not be “shamed” into covering the upcoming select House committee hearings on Benghazi:

“We’re not going to be shamed into it by others who have political beliefs that want to try to have temper tantrums to shame other news organizations into covering something,” he said when asked if CNN would cover the committee during an interview at a Deadline Club dinner, as recorded by Capital New York. “If it’s of real news value, we’ll cover it.”

CNN won’t be “shamed” into covering Benghazi? Not even if…

Oh, well in that case!

  • Follow @yeeyovinci

    Pow pow pow!

  • Smootchie

    I won’t ever be shamed into watching CNN.

  • AzDrifter

    I remember when CNN was a legitimate news source – back around the time MTV actually played music.

    • globalcrap

      CNN, Communist news network, controlled bt the O Bogus regime of government traitors

    • grais

      That must have been before it became the Clinton News Network.

    • Noah

      If Donald fucking Sterling had something to do with Benghazi, CNN would cover it 23 hours and 59 minutes out of every day.

  • castlemonster

    Those without shame can’t be shamed.

  • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

    I bet you can’t see me when I shove my head in a pile of sand.

    • RumDoooogie

      then u would just be a ass

      • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

        Yes but so what when you still can’t see me.

  • RumDoooogie

    hes saying he wont give to political pressures?? kind of a oxymoron

    • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

      You could cross out the “oxy” part and still be correct.

    • tjp77

      No no, he’s caving to political pressure.

      Pressure from the DNC to suppress the story.

  • Mary Mommy Happy 2016!

    CNN will not, repeat, will NOT be shamed into covering the butchery of 4 Americans by Muslim terrorists and discussed how Obama lied about it later. But they will cover and propagandize the hoax of man caused global warming because it’s so important.

  • nc ✓s & balances

    Maybe THIS will wake up the sheeple?

  • Mary Mommy Happy 2016!

    It’s impossible to be shamed when you’re hopelessly shameless about doing everything possible to protect Obama and hide his criminal activities and lies. Seriously though, how exactly is this man not fired?!!!

    Doesn’t CNN have investors and advertisements to answer to? How exactly does a network stay in business with 200K viewers?

    Jeff Zucker and his company are not a real journalists news channel, but only a mouthpiece for the Democrat Communist Party.

    • WhoDat

      If you don’t like they’re not covering it, watch Fox. They’ll be on the Benghazi hearings like white on rice.

      • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

        I think CNN needs to have packaging similar to Cool Whip “non-dairy whipped topping”
        CNN “non-news pseudo-political mumbojumbo”
        *Now with extra hostile female hosts!

      • grais

        That’s hardly the point, of course.

      • Al’s Annoyed Grandpa

        White rice? What about brown rice? Are you a ricist?

  • Republicanvet

    CNN showed they had no shame when they made deals with Saddam to insure their access.

    Nobody should be surprised that that hasn’t changed a bit since then.

    • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

      And when they ran that communist rat Peter Arnett’s phoney US used nerve gas in Cambodia report…. so badly vetted, they not only had to do a complete retraction… they had to fire Arnett..

      who STILL insists it’s twoo it’s twoo……….. Arnett was a filthy US tras b ing disgrace in Vietnam, and still believes every anti-US story even if it comes in a ceral box…. those wiley evil Amur-kins…

      CNN has always been a joke.

      • Al’s Annoyed Grandpa

        I’ve long suspected that Hanoi Jane was the driving force behind that nerve gas story. She was married to Ted Turner at the time….

  • WhoDat

    Cool, their 6 viewers won’t get to see it.

    • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

      They’d turn the channel when they heard the very word “Benghazi”.
      That is if they could still run the remote with their heads having exploded.

      • Republicanvet

        Well, actually, they’d be speed searching Google to find out who he was first.

        • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

          Only the inquisitive ones.

          • http://www.freedomreconnection.com/ FreedomRecon

            Being inquisitive is not allowed on that side.

  • jdog

    What a maroon. This guy runs a major news organization? What an amazing fall from grace for the once proud CNN network. Run by mindless leftist automatons now. If our president does something bad, that’s not news. Only heroic deeds by our dear leader can be reported. We will decide which news is important and what you need to hear because we know what’s best for you. I miss the real CNN.

  • Susan Reaney

    @SSReaney
    @Jeff ZuckerCnn now why would you worry about being “shamed” into reporting on Benghazi, your best effort was televising 4 men in a casket.

    • Republicanvet

      …and they’ve accepted the Youtube excuse since.

  • desicon

    CNN, you have no shame. Your ratings are pathetic. National enquirer is more trustworthy than you.

  • bri

    Says one of networks that was digging through Palins trash and emails.

    • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

      But was strangely and violently hostile to America learning anythingabout Obama that wasn’t his official from the office of the extra special presidential candidate.

      Obama displayed an ego of galatic proportions even then…

      but to watch CNN,… you’d think it was the second coming, they volunteered to be his propagandists early on….

  • Steve__Jacobson

    Regarding the theories CNN put forth to explain the missing plane, “Blackholes”, “Supernatural Occurance”, or “Zombie Plane”, I don’t see how they could be shamed into covering anything.

  • Jeffrey Rogers

    Translation – The President has warned us not to cover it.

    • Republicanvet

      Well, we know CNN has bowed to the wishes of a dictator before.

      • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

        They should have closed their doors after admiting they were essentially letting Saddam run their news coverage…

  • Jeffrey Rogers

    Zucker, will you be covering the impeachment? Just wondering if I should set my DVR to CNN or a real news station.

  • PatSisler

    I don’t watch the Crappy News Nerds CNN or the Minstrel Cycle Nothing But Crap MSNBC, Well to be Honest I don’t watch any of the Nothing But Crap Networks NBC, I Even ask Comcast(“The Pig at the TOP”) to Not bill me for any of the networks that the Nothing But Crap network Owns. Not a word yet from the PIG at the top of Comcast. CNN President: We won’t be “shamed” into covering Benghazi. “Were all ashamed of that network” Crappy news Nothingness. CNN

  • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    CNN: “We cannot be shamed into covering the story; if we don’t wanna cover it, we won’t– and you can’t make us! We won’t, we won’t, we won’t! (*razzberry!*)”

  • jalal michael sabbagh

    F O U R American Heroes are dead .CNN Doesn’t want to know why.2 months CNN is covering the Malaysian and will cover it for the next ///////

  • Maxx

    CNN won’t be shamed? For Pete’s sake, you tools use toy airplanes on the set.

    Thanks for the chuckle Zucker.

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    Y’know, if CNN makes a point of not covering stories that’ll make Obama look bad, then they really won’t have anything to talk about besides that plane.

    • mrspinky85

      Then the theory of Obama getting his information from the news is another lie.

  • schmuck281
  • EDUCATEDPATRIOT

    Well, could they potentially be shamed into doing ONE thing that may affect their ratings in a positive sense?

  • mrspinky85

    CNN’s CEO talking about what he won’t do yet, people get mad when Fox doesn’t bend. Um,ok.

  • agentm0m

    “Won’t be shamed.” That’s pretty interesting choice of words. It suggests he knows full well there’s something he SHOULD be ashamed of, but refuses to concede. He might as well say flat out, he knows there’s something to Benghazi but refuses to cover it, because CNN is part of the cover up.

  • Hotlanta Mike
  • Dobermite

    As I have long maintained:

    To be Shameless is a prerequisite if you wish to reside on the left.

  • stellatruman

    On 9/11/01 , I rushed to turn the TV to CNN instead of the local news…I used to respect them, now when I read this ( and a lot of other headlines similar to this ) It affirms why I will never tune into MSM ever again

  • Jake Bradford

    Maybe if we accused Aaron Hernandez or Georg Zimmerman of killing the Americans in Benghazi.

  • Perso Nasplit

    #zombieplane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSJ6-IJ535c

    You have no credibility CNN. Face it. You are a joke of a “news” outlet.

  • Magnifico

    translation: We’re a bunch of wacky moonbats posing as a news organization.

  • globalcrap

    It should have been one of their O Bogus family members, then they would be screaming for justice . Then again how an O Bogus liberal thinks, maybe not.

  • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

    CNN admitted that they have no shame. This is not news.

  • Driscoll Bowman

    Deliciously revealing.

  • Johnny_Layabout

    Maybe CNN could get the psychic they put on air for their embarrassing Malaysian airliner coverage to tell us how the Benghazi hearings will turn out.

  • jumper297

    Translation: “We won’t be shamed into being news source.”

    • Russ

      Translation: “It’s not worth covering unless our staff gets to play with toy props on air.”

      • journogal

        Actually they could, they could use those props to show how close help was.

  • chicagoxile

    So then, CNN has no shame. Ok, got it.

  • teamfrazzled

    CNN President announces CNN is irrelevant and not the place to find the current, complete news. It also isn’t the place my remote even stops and increasingly fewer remotes stop either. At least he admits he doesn’t believe his job isn’t running a station that reports the news but thinks his job is to manipulate people and deliberately keep them uninformed and misinformed.

  • James McEnanly

    Right now, CNN has less journalistic integrity than a supermarket tabloid. If the Kardashian sisters were to land flight 370 in Ben Ghazi, they would not cover it

  • ToyZebra

    Just curious, Mr. Zucker. During the administrations of Reagan, Bush and W.Bush, did CNN ever announce they would not be shamed into covering an investigation?

  • David Andrew

    lets not forget the CEO of the Communist News Network , his wife works for the Obama Administration.this also explains why CNN didn’t warn any of it’s loyal viewers ,network sponsors or the customers of their network sponsors that they were going to lose their insurance coverage.they sided with the government over their viewers every single time.in each scandal to save the “Fatherland” for their National Socialist (NAZI) friends.these people can not be shamed,you have to have real morals to be shamed.

  • redbirddeb

    One would hope that CNN just signed its own death certificate. Don’t let the door hit ya….

  • End abortion,sodomy&divorce!

    anything without morals can have no shame

  • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

    If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound?

    If CNN does or doesn’t cover the congressional select committee investigation and nobody watches CNN anyway does it make a difference?

  • Prospector

    Their choice, their loss.

  • Chip

    If they had any sense of shame, they wouldn’t do half of the stories they do….

  • porgiefirefighter

    Could your incessant over-coverage of the Malaysian airliner be considered shameful? Asking for a friend.

  • http://michellemalkin.com/ JackieSpringer

    That is the same thing as a dairy farmer saying “we will not be shamed into milking these cows”.

  • Hank_Scorpio

    So basically this assclown is saying they won’t do their job unless it involves a missing Malaysian airliner….If it was CNN’s goal to hire a person so incompetent and married to his ideology that the network will spiral the drain, then mission accomplished…

  • Name

    and you wonder why your ratings suck.

  • Jeffrey Lamela

    “We won’t be shamed into telling the truth.”

  • grais

    Is English Zucker’s 2nd language? That 1st sentence is a doozy.

  • rogleecam

    Zucker looks like Bart Simpson. Could explain priorities?

    • http://commentspammersmustdie.blogspot.com/ Kakarot

      More like Homer Simpson, at least to me.

  • SLAPPY

    What’s worse CNN, not covering Benghazi,or MSNBC’s Smear campaign?Covering for a Rogue gopherment?

  • Finrod Felagund

    Yet they interrupted with BREAKING NEWS less than an hour ago that Democrats are actually going to appoint Democrats to the Benghazi committee.

  • Wanderer

    It’s already been established that CNN is shameless anyway.

  • Beentheremovedaway

    Its amazing that this failure still has a job! Is CNN still a thing?

  • Ironside

    Benghazi definitely doesn’t have any “real news value” when compared to flight MH370 possibly being swallowed up by a black hole especially among the 47%ers.

  • GulfPundit

    Kind of hard to shame a network with CNN’s ratings. Just working there is a daily humiliation.

  • Texan357

    Right. You can’t be shamed if you have no shame.