'Hiroshima of Community Notes': Jacobin Mag Gets NUKED by Reality After Shaming Walmart...
Kristen Welker Left Speechless After Marco Rubio Exposes Left-Wing Lies About Illegal Immi...
Even the Bears Don't Know WTF This Is: Women Pay Thousands for 'Ritual...
Today in 'You Don't Hate the Media Enough': BBC World Laments Ebrahim Raisi's...
Don't Give Them an INCH on Language: School Director Wants to Eliminate the...
Illegal Immigrant Settled in Rochester Says It’s ’Traumatic’ and ‘No Good’
Biden Says You Think He’s Kidding That He Has Tons of Morehouse Men...
Reuters Reports That Aid Coming Through Biden's Pier Has Been Stolen
Iowahawk Declares Five Days of Helicopter Jokes - Twitter (X) Delivers
Shocker: Rep. Jasmine Crockett Accuses Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Racism
Scarlett Johansson Accuses Sam Altman of Basing AI Voice 'Sky' on Her Even...
She Knows She's Lying. Dem Rep. Cori Bush Introduces 'Mike Brown Bill' Pushing...
Biden Mistakenly Claims Hershel Goldberg-Polin is 'With Him' Before Realizing He is Still...
European Union Sends Condolences to Family of Butcher of Tehran
TIME: Florida Made It Difficult for a Man to Get an Abortion

Hot take: GOP fighting to ensure people on watch list, like Osama bin Laden, can buy guns

As Twitchy reported, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) must have thought he had some really good material that didn’t make it into his nearly 15-hour filibuster on guns, like his claim that by not voting to pass the Senate’s four gun control proposals, Republicans and their friends at the NRA were essentially selling assault weapons directly to ISIS: a claim that inspired a quick “Me too!” tweet from Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Advertisement

Writer Kurt Eichenwald is a little late to the party, so he’s upping the ante a bit, claiming that the GOP is fighting to make it as easy as possible for the next Osama bin Laden to buy a gun.

Is there any point in mentioning that 9/11 wasn’t pulled off with an AR-15 but rather box cutters? Probably not.

https://twitter.com/skiptrace_/status/746078451325603840

https://twitter.com/KPL2383/status/746076684420546560

Advertisement

So about that terrorist watch list … it might be a worthwhile tool if it were populated with the names of, you know, terrorists.

https://twitter.com/brad_dallas/status/746078770797363200

https://twitter.com/CommonBrad/status/746077415617748996

https://twitter.com/AngelsCame04/status/746078501581819906

Ana Garcia, a journalist and occasional travel blogger for the Huffington Post, wrote a piece this week for the Washington Post about her life on a mysterious government watch list. For the record, she accepts the inconvenience of secondary screenings in exchange for whatever security the list is alleged to provide, though she has no idea why she’s on the list and isn’t allowed to know.

Garcia writes:

The authorities won’t tell me what “bad Ana Garcia” has done, but based on the facial expressions of the numerous immigration and customs officers who have questioned me, she’s bad.

Technically, I am on a Transportation Security Administration selectee list. That’s one down from the no-fly list.

I don’t have a constitutional right to board a plane, or reenter the United States without a secondary screening.

I will be the first to tell you, it sucks.

Advertisement

Garcia says she’s fine with a gun ban for “terrorists on a watch list,” yet she’s innocent but on a watch list anyway. So why not put everyone on a watch list to be really, really sure?

“It just makes sense that if you are a terrorist on a watch list, you should be banned from buying weapons,” she concludes. “And if you are innocent like me, I am sure the government can come up with a redress number specifically to protect your Second Amendment right.”

Thankfully, some aren’t depending on a bunch of Democrats pulling an all-night temper tantrum to protect their constitutional rights.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement