WATCH: Columbia Student Protest Leader Says Israel Supporters 'Don't Deserve to Live'
It was the RUSSIANS, Adam! Adam Schiff ROBBED in San Francisco and What...
Maybe the Supreme Court Should ‘Take a Walk:’ A Deep Dive Into Thursday’s...
President Biden's Commencement Speech at Morehouse Proving Problematic
NYPD Chief of Patrol Rebuts AOC's Anti-Cop Rant - Twitter (X) Loves It
Um, WOW: Resurfaced Kirstie Alley Interview About Parents' Car Accident Has X Asking...
If Students Had Pro-Israel Encampments, Would You Still Support the Police?
Satire Site 'The Onion' Has New Ownership Well Qualified to Publish Fake News
Rep. Ilhan Omar and Her Homeless, Starving Daughter Meet With Columbia Pro-Hamas Mob
Iran’s Supreme Leader Issues Statement of Support for Pro-Hamas Protesters
Terrorists Attack Joe Biden's Temporary Pier to Bring Aid to Palestinians
WATCH: Jewish NYU Professor SMACKS DOWN Campus Protest Hypocrisy
Justice Brett Kavanaugh Asks Why Barack Obama Was Never Prosecuted
OOF: Axios Poll Shows Majority of Americans (42% of Democrats!) Support Trump's Immigratio...
USC Cancels Main Graduation Ceremony Citing Safety Concerns in the Wake of Pro-Palestine...

Dream on: Washington Post runs piece on getting rid of Justice Brett Kavanaugh without impeaching him

Even before Sen. Dianne Feinstein dropped that letter she’d been sitting on for six weeks, there were plenty of wishful thinking articles and tweets about how even if Judge Brett Kavanaugh were confirmed, he could be impeached after he was seated.

Advertisement

Kavanaugh has been seated, but the anti-Kavanaugh faction isn’t giving up yet. In the Washington Post Wednesday, University of Chicago law professor Aziz Huq argued that there are two ways to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court that don’t rely on impeachment.

In short, here they are:

In the first, a new president would nominate and the Senate would confirm by majority vote a justice — in this case Kavanaugh — to a different post on an intermediate court of appeals (say the D.C. Circuit, where Kavanaugh formerly served). The justice would, in effect, be demoted.

That brings us to the second alternative method of relieving a justice of his or her duties. In a 2006 article in the Yale Law Journal, two scholars (conservatives, as it happens), Saikrishna Prakash and Steven D. Smith, amassed historical evidence that the Framers understood the “good behavior” standard to be judicially, rather than just politically, enforceable.

Little good has come from the Kavanaugh confirmation process. But Kavanaugh opponents have a rare chance to push for a positive institutional change as they press their immediate agenda. If the political stars align, something good for our constitutional democracy might result from their efforts: a better way to discipline errant federal judges.

Advertisement

Discipline Kavanaugh for what, exactly?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement