Robert Reich is consistently wrong about a lot of things. Well, everything, really.
Economics? Wrong. Politics? Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
And when it comes to the U.S. Constitution, he’s extra-mega-ultra wrong:
The Second Amendment was never intended to permit mass slaughter.
— Robert Reich (@RBReich) January 29, 2023
Can’t believe he didn’t point out that the Second Amendment was written back when we only had muskets. It’s actually kind of disappointing.
Oh well. That certainly doesn’t take away from the staggering stupidity of his staggeringly stupid tweet.
Opinion is the lowest form of intellect.
— The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial) January 30, 2023
Well, Robert Reich’s opinion is certainly the lowest form of intellect. If you can even call what he has “intellect.”
Lol no.
— David Giglio (@DavidGiglioCA) January 30, 2023
Seriously, what a dumb take. What was the Second Amendment intended for then, Robert? When was the last time you read it? When was the last time you cracked open a history book?
You're right for once. It was intended to help prevent it. https://t.co/qy7FQpTeOh
— Tommy Face on Fire (@TommyFaceOnFire) January 30, 2023
The Second Amendment was intended to prevent mass slaughter.
— Among the Wildflowers (@deaflibertarian) January 30, 2023
Yes it was. It was intended to prevent mass tyranny which frequently results in mass slaughter. https://t.co/stSPs2gKfv
— Dave of the Desert (@DaveSwindle) January 30, 2023
Correct! The purpose is to prevent mass slaughter and tyranny. Read a history book once in a while. https://t.co/JV1HRQlbsy
— Kat O’Connor 🇺🇸 (@kat1567) January 30, 2023
It was intended to stop the mass slaughter of American citizens by a tyrannical government.
— David Giglio (@DavidGiglioCA) January 30, 2023
The 2nd Amendment was designed to prevent mass slaughter of us by our government.
Thomas Jefferson:
-The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
– One loves to possess arms, though they hope never to have occasion for them.
— Allen Waters (@AllenWatersRI) January 29, 2023
Actually, it was written precisely to prevent an overreaching government committing mass slaughter against its own people, just as tyrannical regimes have in multiple places where the citizens were disarmed first.
Do you ever get anything right?
— Matthew Marsden (@matthewdmarsden) January 30, 2023
No. No he does not.
Thats why there are laws against murder
— ray (@rayizdamngued) January 30, 2023
And that’s why laws forbidding murder are constitutional.
— Matthew Kolken (@mkolken) January 30, 2023
Unfortunately for Robert, there’s no law forbidding anyone from dragging him the way he deserves to be dragged.
You know what…I agree. We need to take away the government’s guns. https://t.co/AbvO28yKg4
— Natalie F Danelishen (@Chesschick01) January 30, 2023
Just to be safe!
***
Related:
Robert Reich’s new argument against the Second Amendment blows up in his face
Robert Reich’s attempt to blame big city crime spikes on Trump & Republicans is a MASSIVE fail
Robert Reich’s take on ‘life-saving abortion’ and assault rifles is bad … even for Robert Reich
***
