Unglued Awakening: Jessica Tarlov Shocked to Learn Conservatives Treat Her Better Than Far...
Lady Gaga Had a Baby at a Great Hospital — ‘Free Palestine’ Losers...
Program to Help Businesses Hurt by Operation Metro Surge Shut Down Due to...
Gas Prices Hurt and Sneering at Working Families Doesn’t Help
Kaitlan Collins Calls CNN White House Ban an ‘Illegal Assault’ on Their Constitutional...
Abdul El-Sayed Got Heightmogged by an Average Sized Female State Rep. and Became...
Jessica Tarlov Saying Dems Are on the Side of Sanity Nearly Made Bill...
Good Samaritan Tells Reporter Near the White House How CNN Can Get Its...
Converse-Troversy! Washington Post Tries to 'Sneak' in Some Race Rage Over Shoe Ad
Remember When Brian Stelter Asked If Fox News Should Lose WH Access and...
'It's Two Letters': Scott Presler Hauls Out a Kamala Classic As the Debate...
Self-Proclaimed 'Cis Gender Woman' Tells J.K. Rowling She Can't CHOOSE Who's a Woman...
Video Compilations End CNN's Screeching About the WH Ban and 'Fair and Accurate...
She's Still GOING: Sue O'Connell Straight-Up UNHINGED, Continues Picking Fights With X Ove...
Nancy Mace SO Emasculated Mehdi Hasan That He Went AFTER Her on X...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos