CA’s First Partner Shocked Seeing Trump Speak to a Female Journalist With That...
Sick Twist: Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi Says Trump’s Popularity Problem Justifies Attempts on...
CNN, Axios Report Team Trump's Back to Slamming the Media Even After Their...
David Axelrod Says Trump Immediately 'Seized' on WHCA Attack to Justify 'His' Ballroom
Self-Proclaimed 'Socialist Socialite' Gets SLAMMED for Trying to Dunk on Jennifer Hegseth'...
Batya Ungar-Sargon Unleashes a Tweetstorm of Truth on the Left and Its Culture...
Democrats Downplay Trump's Assassination Attempts by Inventing Obama Plots with Rednecks a...
Karoline Leavitt Says Dems Have Spent YEARS Inspiring Violence and This Thread Has...
How the First Amendment Protected Christians, Not Secularism
WTAF?! LISTEN to What S.E. Cupp Said About Trump Barely 30 Minutes Before...
Trump Is Refusing to Let Them Forget What They Did
Melania Slammed Kimmel for 'Joke' About Her Being Widowed and Brian Stelter Thinks...
Bro, TAKE THE L! Hakeem Jeffries DROPPED Like a Bad HABIT for Lecturing...
Dem Rep. Vindman Says Attempt to Assassinate the President Means Trump Needs to...
X's Nikita Bier's Response to Taylor Lorenz Crying About Leftist Utopia BlueSky Canceling...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement