Scott Jennings Rebukes Donna Brazile for Comparing Tea Party Movement to Dem Party’s...
Men Need Purpose at Work — Here’s the Advice I’m Giving My Daughter
From Comedy to Commie: DSA Co-Chair Says Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ Was...
Mehdi Hasan Is Still Pretending Hasan Piker’s 9/11 Posturing and Jew-Hatred Are No...
This Legislation Could End Government Shutdowns Once and for All
Sen. Jim Banks Gives Credit to Trade Policies
Abdul El-Sayed Brags That He and His Wife ‘Actually Like Each Other —...
Prez Agency: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Says She Hasn’t Ruled Out White House Run In...
'Woke 1 Was Crazy': AOC Tries to Memory-Hole Her Peak Defund-And-Abolish Era
Insane Framing: Sports Illustrated Claims Sophie Cunningham Got a 'Bitter Taste of Karma'
House Leadership: American Security Against Healthcare Costs
AOC Freezes Her Eggs and Films the Shot: The Parturition Will Be Televised...
'Stewardship Is the Issue': HUD Secretary Scott Turner DROPS Reporter Asking About Budget...
This Fear Is REAL: Pramila Jayapal Learns the Hard Way That NO ONE...
LOL, the BOOS! Abigail Spanberger Served Up a BRUTAL Heapin' Helpin' of REALITY...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement