‘I Am Brian McGinnis’: Sen. Tim Sheehy 'Created a Million' Activists by Breaking...
Ilhan Omar Expresses Concern About What Trump's Iran Operation Is Costing Taxpayers and...
Clown Take of the Day: Jemele Hill Says Nebraska Has No Stake in...
GOP Holds Its Own Accountable: Kennedy's Grill Session and Trump's Anger Lead to...
Democrats Blame His Fox News Republican Brother—But Fetterman’s Just Listening to Pennsylv...
Katie Couric Asks Gavin Newsom If He Has a 'Zoolander Problem' (Being 'Ridiculously...
Beto's Back... to Boost Another Loser! Hails Talarico as TX Savior – Critics...
From Pearl-Clutcher to Nazi Apologist: Tim Miller Wonders What Graham Platner's Nazi Tatto...
CNN Sparks Democrat Panic As Trump Support Surges Among Republicans
President Trump Has Replaced DHS Secretary Kristi Noem; New Chief Announced
'They Want Trump BROKEN!' Bill O'Reilly Nukes US Media Whose TDS Has Them...
Current Iranian Regime Allows CNN to Report From Tehran (and People Have Questions)
Texas Dem James Talarico Says Republicans 'Are Gonna Call Me a Radical Leftist'...
Barack Obama Claims Free and Fair Elections Are at Risk Because of GOP...
CNN Seems Upset All This Lefty Screeching Hasn't Halted Final Approval for Trump's...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement