Central Casting Delivers: Out-of-Touch Socialist Operatives Pick Graham Platner, Then Get...
John Harwood Still Crushing on Obama After All These Years
Scott Jennings Corners TRAITOR Miles Taylor — Who Smugly Admits He Tried to...
HA! 'Pathological Liar' Graham Platner Lashes Out Whining About Defamation, TRIPS Over Dam...
Kristen Welker Busted by Trump Over California Mail-in-Ballot Cover up
Chuck Schumer Tried to Cook Up an Anti-Trump Take for Tonight's Knicks Game...
DRAAAG HIM! Lara Logan ENDS Jake Tapper for Scolding Trump After Welker Interview...
HIS Voters --> Nutball Mainer Says She's Ok With Graham Platner's Nazi Tat...
Face That LAUNCHED 1000 Memes! Kristin Welker's Expressions During Trump Interview Go Hila...
Hakeem Jeffries Got Asked 'What Happened to Believe All Women' (the Awkward Pause...
Scott Jennings Went THERE Making BRUTAL #MeToo Jab at Graham Platner Who Wants...
LEGEND: When Trump Walked Out on BS Interview We Missed Something Awesome (and...
UNHINGED UFC Whack-Job Threatens to Beat Ben Shapiro UP ... Over Candace Owens...
Julie Kelly Hammers Regime Media Over What They REFUSE to Consider About J6...
Aww, Bless Her STUPID Little Heart: Jessica Tarlov Lays it on THICK Spinning...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement