Shackles and Shakedowns: Gavin Newsom Seeks to Shame California Companies With Ties to...
Susan Rice Wants Steve Hilton to Stop Using Her Name Against Becerra (by...
LA-HOO-ZA-HER: Hillary Clinton Instantly REGRETS Sharing 2 Headlines to Dunk on Trump's Ec...
Letitia James Appointed Special Prosecutor in Cornell 7 Case
LOL-YIKES: Randi Weingarten's Unhinged Rant Appears to Frighten the 2 Dems Onstage With...
El-Sayed's Viral Exchange With Iranian-American Backfired So Hard the Guy Cut an Ad...
Abdul El-Sayed Says 'Black Folk' Have Never Had Access to REAL Capitalism —...
Sir Charles Barkley Has a Few Questions for the No-Cops, No-Prisons Crowd (Dems...
James Woods Just Needs One PERFECTLY Brutal Pic-Post to END Ro Khanna and...
Try to Spot Trends in These Gas Price, Income Tax and Population Gain/Loss...
Clean Up, Aisle CNN! WATCH Bill de Blasio Loses His Cool Debating...
Abdul El-Sayed Would Like a Million Millionaires Instead of 1 Billionaire (Has He...
Socialist Nutball Rep. Angie Nixon BIG MAD at JD Vance for Speaking HIS...
Absolutely Freaking NOT! Zohran Mamdani Describes His Grand Vision for Socialist Utopia to...
Marrow-Minded: Ben Rhodes Says His Bones Tell Him Racism Over Obama Shapes Today’s...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement