Forging Ahead: Father of Fake News and Other CBS Alumni Sign Letter for...
Warts and All: Platner Disses Other State Dem Voters In Just Released Pre-Sexting...
Pelley-Aching: Complaining ‘60 Minutes’ Host Is Clueless to Why Most Americans Fear Going...
‘We’re Being Poisoned’: Jimmy Kimmel Says Late-Night TV Isn’t Dying of Natural Causes
Purge Urge: ‘Economist’ Paul Krugman Says U.S. Needs a ‘DeMAGAfication’ Like Germany’s De-...
MS NOW Anchor Feels ‘Deep Unease’ Over Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday
Nation Columnist Says the ‘Messier’ Platner Turns Out to Be, the More He...
Cato Stooge: ‘So You Can’t Sit on a Sidewalk Anymore?’ Not After Curfew...
Bernie Sanders’ Bill Would Have Government Take Half of AI Companies’ Stock
‘Murder,’ He Smote!: Raging Scott Pelley Goes Off on Bari Weiss and New...
Twin Cities Anti-ICE Protesters Awarded the JFK Profile in Courage Award
Free Press: Graham Platner’s ‘Troubles’ Strike Many as Relatable, Like Their Drunk Right-W...
New Jersey State Troopers Step Up, Rush Anti-ICE Rioters at 9 PM Curfew;...
Federal Appeals Court Finds Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Unconstitutional, Based Upon...
Bulwark Founder FANGIRLS Over 'Brand New to Politics' Graham Platner Who She Claims...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement