The Economist: Soaring Number of Canadian Muslim Schools Traced to Islamophobia
SCHUMER SHUTDOWN SALE: 60% Off VIP Memberships!
The Economist: A Month of Bombing Iran Has Achieved Nothing
WSJ: Cancellation of Student Visas Has Left Africa’s Brightest With Broken Dreams
Dems Shut Down Govt, TSA Goes Unpaid — CNN Mad at Rick Scott...
NBC News: Trump Travel Ban Separates Young Husband From Wife Here on Student...
Protect American Medical Education: Merit Over Imports and Discrimination
Gov. Mikie Sherrill Won't Let New Jersey Tolerate Roving Masked Militias, Bans Masks
Two Years After Its Collapse, Let’s Check in on the Rebuilding Effort of...
Puck Yuks: Nashville NHL Team Unveils Rainbow PRIDE ‘Gay Predators’ Logo, Laughter Erupts...
PANIC: ‘White Plague’ Is Deadlier Than COVID and Is on the Rise in...
Testosterone-Fueled Tantrum: Trans LOL-YER Loses It in Court, Resists Arrest Gasping 'I Ca...
Governor Newsom Press Office Making Grindr Jokes About Critics
From Roof to Handcuffs: Cambridge Woman Goes Viral for Hiring Illegals and Calling...
REALLY!? Lefties Triggered by Trump's Slam on Dems Say We Need a President...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement