DEVELOPING: Here We Go Again: Another ICE-Involved Shooting, This Time in Austin (VIDEO)
Bloodsucker Proxy: Communist Asks for a DSA Mascot, Gets a Whole Lot More
Ron DeSantis Shares Headline That Sums Up Healthcare in 2026
Sen. Chuck Grassley Argues for a Diesel Embargo
Ed Sheeran Should Have Listened to Dana Loesch — NEVER Bend the Knee...
Jonathan Karl Remembers the First Amendment
Take the L, Barack: You Pulled the SAME 'Ban the Media' Stunt You're...
Dana Bash Tries Shaming Mike Walz for Defending Trump's CNN Ban and WOW,...
HOOBOY: Amy Klobuchar Caught Using the Same Pic Trying to Connect With Normies...
Look Out Elizabeth Warren, Peggy Flanagan Is Coming for YOUR Grift (and She's...
Troy Jackson Dodging This Particular Question Is Just DAMNING on So Many Levels...
TWOCH Full VOD Episode 09192026
WATCH: Student BIZARRELY Flips Out After Black Pro-Lifer Hits Back on Her ‘Kirk...
Guess Who Came to Dinner? Abdul El-Sayed's 'Lesbian Rosh Hashanah' Stunt BACKFIRES Spectac...
The Hack Is Back: Podcaster Jim Acosta Abandons Pool Duty to Encourage ‘Journo’...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement