Watch a Bunch of 'Journalists' Just Nod Along As AOC Pushes BS Spin...
Explosive Senate Hearing Today: CIA Insider Testifies Fauci 'Injected Himself' to Kill Lab...
Chutzpah Level: Expert. Alex Soros Demands You Ignore His Dad's Jew-Hating Proxies
Podcast Bro Suddenly Cares About a Candidate's Past: Sees Spencer Pratt and Not-Sees...
EU Obsessed with Hoisting Pride Flags While Ignoring REAL Threats to Europeans (Including...
James Comey Wants Trump Supporters to Look in a Mirror and Ask Themselves...
Media Double Standard: Gerstein's Jackson Love Letter Ignores Dem Court-Packing, Impeachme...
Team Zohran's Bragging About Mamdani Bringing NYC's Deficit to Zero Earns a Few...
Thomas Massie in Deep Trouble: Trump-Backed Challenger Leads New Kentucky Primary Poll
Choose Wisely, Los Angeles: As Spencer Pratt Surges, Karen Bass Wants Free Teeth...
Ex DHS Secretary Mayorkas Tries to Spin Biden's Open Border and NOBODY Is...
Sunny Imposition: The View’s Hostin Invents Convenient Reason to Never Stop Lecturing Us...
Disorderly Dems: TN GOP Removes Disruptive Justin Pearson and Others From Their House...
NBC Tries to Sell New Pandemic Panic But No One Is Buying
Check Out These Flashback Reports From Obama's Reflecting Pool Renovation

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement