OOF! Stephen A. Smith's Poll About Violent Political Rhetoric Does NOT GO WELL...
'They Not Like Us': Spencer Pratt's New Campaign Ad for LA Mayoral Race...
Cowntraversy: Google Street Values Your Privacy, if You're a Cow
A Murder of Jim Crows: Schumer and Dems Ignorantly Invoke Segregation Laws As...
WaPo: White House Ballroom Will Set in Stone Trump’s ‘Regal Conception of the...
Map Flap: CNN’s Laura Coates Calls SCOTUS VRA Ruling ‘Illogical’ As Dems Double...
Family Federally Indicted for Assault on TPUSA Reporter at Anti-ICE Demonstration
Mahmoud Khalil Tells New York Magazine He Misses His Old Life (Let’s Send...
Ann Arbor Removes Last Neighborhood Watch Sign, Ending Part of City’s Troubled Racist...
Newsom Press Office Has Total Meltdown Over Supreme Court Gerrymandering Ruling and Florid...
ABC News: SCOTUS Considering Whether Trump 'Unlawfully Ordered' Migrants Sent Home
Maine Dem Senate Candidate With Swastika Ink Furious Supreme Court Won't Force Race-Based...
Marc Elias’ Interpretation of SCOTUS VRA Decision Is Intellectually Dishonest and Wrong
Local News Says FBI Used a Battering Ram to Raid a Daycare in...
She Seems Nice: Seattle’s Socialist Nepo Mayor Cackles 'BYE' as Wealth Flees Her...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement