Beyond Parody: What Was Once a Darkly Hilarious SNL Skit Is Now a...
Ari Fleischer Has GREAT Questions After Mamdani's 'ID to Enter Stores but Not...
Gosh, This Is WEIRD: You Won't Believe THIS Inconvenient Fact About DSA Members...
Holy DUMPSTER-FIRE, Batman! Francesca Hong FAN-GIRLING Over Ilhan Omar Goes REALLY Wrong (...
Dr. Bhattacharya Puts Politico on BLAST for Misreporting RFK Jr. Put Constitution Over...
Spencer Pratt Spotted NYC Mayor Mamdani Being a Devious Communist at City-Run Grocery...
Michigan Dem Operative Spills ALL the Tea, Admits the Party Is Worried About...
Don't Give the CDC a Pass on COVID, Newly Released Docs Show They...
Don't Look Now, but We've Found ANOTHER American Holiday Francesca Hong Hates
Did NOT Have Martina Navratilova Dropping the MIC on Lefty Rag Smearing Sophie...
Is She CRYING?! Seattle Socialist Mayor CRUMBLES When Pressed by Media During Shooting...
Step Aside, Zohran! Francesca Hong's Next Up in Bringing on Jim Crow 2.0
HA! Scott Jennings Using Zohran Mamdani's ID-Required Grocery Stores to KNEE-CAP Dems Is...
It's ALL HAPPENING! Scott Presler Cries Tears of POLITICAL JOY Sharing HUGE News...
Oh, WOW! NOW We Know WHY the Biden Team Fought So Hard to...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement