Governor Newsom Press Office Genuinely Sorry for the MAGA People Miserable About Pride...
What Ben Sasse’s Battle With Death Revealed About Modern Family Life
James Talarico’s Church Funds Trans Summer Camp and Travel for Out-of-State Abortions
Graham Platner Finally Took Down His Creepy Kik Profile After 3,000 Days
UK Police Release DAMNING Bodycam Footage of Themselves Handcuffing a Stabbed Henry Nowak
Jake Tapper Wondering If Jill Biden Was Enabling Her Husband Through 'WHAT WE...
Umm ... WHAT? Buckley Carlson Wants America to Embrace Russia as Our Anti-Globo-Homo...
Freudian SLIP?! Jill Biden Misspeaks, Spills ALL the Tea on Joe 'Picking' Kamala...
Graham Platner Left Stranded by Democrats Who Want Nothing to do With Him
Marco Rubio Drops the HAMMER on Democrat Sen. Jacky Rosen Over Iran, Leaves...
Muriel Bowser Learns the Hard Way That Calling Her City the GAYEST City...
Wanna See Just How WARPED Democrats Really Are? Check Out This Thread of...
NOOOO! OUR EYES! Jesse Watters 'Exposes' Another Little Graham Platner Tidbit We NEVER...
'Sit This One OUT, Jakey': Jake Tapper Quotes Jill Biden Pretending He Didn't...
Just Gets WORSE! Turns Out Graham Platner Isn't JUST a Perverted Nazi Scumbag,...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement