Hasan Piker’s Bigotry Derails Interview as He Berates Nithya Raman Over Israel’s Right...
Hakeem Jeffries Tries to Pin the Dems' Virginia Backfire on 'Far Right SCOTUS...
NYT Reporter Runs to CNN's Kaitlan Collins After Trump 'Attacks' Him on Air...
BBC: Man Drives Car Into Pedestrians in Italy Before Trying to Stab Them
Trust the Experts! Here's Another '10 Years Until...' Climate Change Fear Mongering Fail...
What Ultra-Processed Food Hides Inside Your Muscles
Dem Dorothy McAuliffe Suspends Campaign for House Seat That Doesn't Exist and Blames...
Journos Are Noticing This 2-Year Old Video of Biden Challenging Trump Had a...
Gov. Polis Torpedoes CNN Host's 'Some People Say' Spin on Clemency for Whistleblower...
'That's How Bad It Was'! Here Are the 3 Most Telling Words About...
After SCOTUS Summarily REJECTS Democrats' Appeal to Overturn SCOVA, the Left Has an...
Wispy Woman: Dem Senate Hopeful James Talarico Says His Mysterious, Unseen Girlfriend Is...
Gov. Abigail Spanberger Fumes as SCOTUS Denies Democrat Party’s Virginia Redistricting Map...
FAFO in Tallahassee: Rep. Angie Nixon Arrested After Storming DeSantis’ Office
NYC’s Islamist Mayor Mamdani Honors ‘Nakba’ — When Arabs Tried and Failed to...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement