Jonathan Turley Has a Short Reading Assignment for Media Putting Woke Spin on...
Need a Mirror? Hillary Clinton Trips Over ... Hillary Clinton In Post About...
Illinois Governor Who Said Biden Was Mentally Sharp Just Diagnosed Trump With Dementia
Bernie Sanders' 'Hottest Ever Summer' Rant About Fossil Fuels Sounded VERY Familiar (and...
Pramila Jayapal Is Very Upset That Parents of Children Murdered By Illegals Are...
Scott Jennings Calls Birthright Citizenship Ruling by SCOTUS an ‘Abomination’ That Benefit...
Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported
PA Senators Reach Across the Aisle to Rally Commonwealth for Great American State...
The Amish Clearly Do Not Want to Assimilate Into American Society, Yet the...
The Nation Scolds AOC for Never Apologizing for Covering for the Pro-Genocide Wing...
Axios: GOP Reboots the Red Scare as Young Voters Embrace Socialism
Elon Musk Responds to Nicholas Kristof’s List of Children He’s Killed With Aid...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos