Jeffries Demands Swalwell Drop Gov. Bid Over Allegations — But Won’t Call for...
Believe All Women … Except When It’s Me: Swalwell Seeks Due Process He...
'Start Packing Your Bags': Mahmoud Khalil’s Latest Appeal Rejected, Deportation Looms ......
Ape-solutely BANANAS! WSJ Reports on Hair-Raising Civil War That Is Ravaging Africa
Robbed Blind: Medicaid Fraudster Uses Taxpayer Millions to Post Bond in Walz’s Courts,...
NYT’s Hilarious Meltdown: Labels Law-Abiding J6ers a 'Crime Spree' at Just 0.8 Percent
Washington Post Journalist Who Won Pulitzer for Roy Moore Smear Pleads Guilty to...
Spencer Pratt Unleashes on LA Times: Stalking Lap Dog Reporter Served Legal Papers...
Oof! Swalwell’s Campaign Chair Rep. Jimmy Gomez Bails, Tells Him to Drop Out...
Eric Swalwell: Fang Fang Was Just Practice, Staffer Now Claims Drunken Sexual Assault...
Pete Buttigieg Takes an Inflation Jab at Trump and Accidentally KOs the Biden...
Sorry (Not Sorry), Alphabet Mob: 'Pride' Is OVER, Even In San Francisco
'Stick to DATA': US Oil & Gas Association Takes EVERY Democrat Lie About...
Not to Be Outdone by OTHER Democrats Using the F-Word, Eric Swalwell Drops...
How Many Times Has Stephen King Tweeted About Trump Since Announcing He'd 'No...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement