Here's a Hilarious Detail About Who Runs the 'Nonpartisan' Texas Polling Firm Showing...
Left Loses it Over Hegseth Wife Workout With Troops — Forgets Jill’s Cabinet...
David Axelrod Spots a 'Hilarious Turn of Events' in TX Senate Race (and...
Just Another Dem-Funded Riot: A Signal Message Exposed the Organized Machine Behind NJ...
CNN’s Smerconish Torches Graham Platner: '18 Years of Nazi Tattoo Was a Daily...
When Will Talarico Formally Introduce Straight Cisgendered Men in Texas to His Friend...
Tom Steyer Wants Prosecutions After WH Meme Shows Aliens Being Put Back on...
DOJ Announces Rioter Who Threatened to Kill ICE Agent and His Family Is...
Illegal Alien Who Faked Being an Iowa Superintendent Sentenced to Two Years in...
Honeymoon Over: Democrats Turn on Their Own After Fetterman Podcast Appearance With Katie...
Daily Beast Hits Rock Bottom: Smears Sec. Duffy's Newborn Grandchild in Deranged TDS...
Talarico's Mystery Vegan Gal Pal: Ex-Chief of Staff, Gay Bar Dancer, and the...
Christians: Stop Equating Paxton's Personal Sins with Talarico's Outright Heresy
Jill Biden’s Family Image Rehab Tour Crumbles: Even Dems and Ex-Aides Aren’t Buying...
Cough Once and Suddenly You Hate Open-Air Drug Markets: Pratt's Epic New Video...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos