The Most American Idea Nobody Talks About
Gulag Dialogue: Pete Buttigieg Leans Into Fear That MAGA Will Put LGBTQ+ People...
Richard Grenell Has a Question for Brian Stelter About His Comments on The...
Tina Fey Cheers SNL’s Brett Kavanaugh Smear: 'It Helped Alleviate Frustration'
OOF: Steve Cheung Catches Dan Goldman Pushing Obviously FAKE NEWS and HOOBOY, Talk...
John Fetterman Stayed the Same ... Democrats Radicalized and Now They Want Him...
The Look on Ro Khanna's Face While Being Reminded How Obama Coddled Iran...
WATCH Cory Booker Lose His Damn Mind at MI Women's Event, Starts Screaming...
Ilhan Omar Panics & Wipes Millions Of Dollars As Kash Patel Drops Massive...
Spanberger's Latest BRAG Reminds Virginians WHY She's the Most Unpopular Governor There in...
Rahm Emanuel Just Threw the Democratic Party Under the Bus (So, What's He...
Dana Loesch and Others Sink Gavin Newsom's Despicable Attempt to Blame a Shooting...
Gonna CRY! Elise Stefanik Turns Jake Tapper Into a Simpering Mess Over Trump/Iran...
UH OH! Kash Patel Seeks BIG Bucks in Defamation Lawsuit Against The Atlantic
Scott Jennings Takes Abigail Spanberger APART in Heated Debate With Van Jones on...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement