People Express Their Love for Harmless Minneapolis Highway Scooter Takeover
Mod Fraud: Jessica Tarlov Tries to Rebrand NYC DSA Member AOC As a...
New York DSA to Illegal Aliens: ‘You Don’t Have to Have Papers to...
Dems (Led by Bakari Sellers) Remain Obsessed With Nikki Haley’s Name and She’s...
Joe Scarborough Shocked Anti-Semitic DSA Co-Chair Wanted to Attend Hamas Rally After Oct...
WNBA Player’s 'White Privilege' Tweet After Flagrant Foul Suddenly Has Nothing to Do...
Lawsuit Seeks to Prevent Rumored Somali Gang Shootout at Minnesota State Fair
'Sacred Right to Seize Homes - or It's Over': Mamdani Aide Drops Mask,...
Francesca Hong Explains That Toxic White Supremacy Is Ingrained in This Country's History
Surgical Strife: Seattle City Council Approves Taxpayer Money for ‘Trans Refugee’ Sex Chan...
Sports Illustrated Changes Its Headline About Sophie Cunningham and ‘Karma’ After Backlash
Joe Scarborough Snaps on 'Morning Joe' Over Democrat Socialists
Cheese Wheel of Fortune: Italian Parmesan Banks Face Economic Meltdown Due to Extreme...
Fauci’s Secret Texts: 'Shot Might Cause Miscarriages'… yet Told Pregnant Women It Was...
Greasy Gavin Newsom Comes Up With a New Label for Himself to Try...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement