Jonathan Turley Shares the Truth: The Left Called It a False Flag —...
AOC: 'No Place for Political Violence' — After Calling Trump Hitler And Palling...
Apology Lasted Hours: Jvnior Promises to Stop Lying, Immediately Posts Bogus IDF Shirt...
Sean Davis Spots a Difference Between Football Games and a Hotel
Bill Kristol Is Concerned About How It Could Be Used
PBS WH Correspondent (Acosta's GF!) BODIED for Whining That Hegseth Wouldn't Answer Questi...
Bless Their HEARTS! Brian Stelter and Other Media Already Making Assassination Attempt Abo...
CLASSY: You Can Tell How ABSOLUTELY SHOOK Mainstream Media Were After WHCD Shooting,...
Retired Green Beret Unpacks Troubling, Even DAMNING Points About Trump Assassination Attem...
WTF? Grab Your Tinfoil and Then Check Out a Post That COULD be...
Here Are the Most REPUGNANT Posts From the Very WORST People After 4th...
In His OWN Words: Asra Nomani Drops Video of 'Not Just Any Ol...
Wisconsin Brewery Offers Free Beer to Celebrate Trump Assassination, Ignites Nationwide Ba...
Oops! Judge Blocks Bulletproof WH Ballroom Right Before Assassination Attempt Proves Why I...
Trump Niece’s Sick Joke on Assassination Attempt Backfires Spectacularly

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement