Rob Schneider Declares Islamophobia Doesn’t Exist in Response to Proposed VA Legislation
Rep Says There Are So Many Homophobes in This Admin With 'Weird, Like,...
CNN's Brian Stelter Says CBS Is 'Prebunking' President Trump's Address
NBC News: Young Dad Working to Give His Daughter a Stable Life Killed...
Masked Woman at Mamdani Housing Event Declares That Eviction Equals Violence
Former Marine and Congressional Candidate Arrested After Saying Trump Must Be 'Killed'
CNN Legal Analyst Norm Eisen Flirts With Libel of Todd Blanche on Nicolle...
‘The Odyssey’s’ Bad Rap Gets Worse With a Cringe Cast Video That’s Giving...
New York Post: Sen Ruben Gallego Had Sexual Relationships With Two House Staffers
Pro-Illegal Alien Dem James Talarico Laughably Laments Biden ‘Failing to Secure Our Southe...
JD Vance Torches Thune For SAVE Act Stalling in Senate
Mic Drop Alert! Ex AG Reminds Adam Schiff That Hating Trump Does NOT...
TEE-HEE! Chuck Schumer's Reaction When Reporter Asks Him About Farting on the Floor...
Harvard Dolt Proposes Cutting a Deal With the Right to LET the Left's...
AWKWARD: Disastrous DNC Chair Ken Martin Made DNC Leaders Sign NDAs Before Meeting...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement