CNN Doesn't Even Crack the Top 35 (Heck, Reruns on Other CHANNELS Are...
Jack Smith Under Fire As Bombshell New Trump Probe Records Surface
Had Him DEAD to Rights: John Kennedy SO Owned Jack Smith That Dick...
Obama Face-Plants SPECTACULARLY Asking How Americans Got So 'Toxic and Divided'. No, Reall...
MEE-OW: Hasan Piker’s Maid Clip Is Making the Rounds and HOOBOY, He CAN'T...
STUNNED: Jack Smith Has True Deer in Headlights Moment As Eric Schmitt Breaks...
Heap Big OUCH! Elizabeth Warren's Self-Righteous List of 'Hills She'll Die On' SKEWERED...
Byron York Fact-NUKES Team Talarico's Lie About Ken Paxton's Uvalde God Comments in...
Every Time Ro Khanna Pushes Eat the Rich Rhetoric, X Posts Pics of...
We Could Watch Jake Tapper BEG Mike Walz to Ask Trump to 'Let...
Justine Bateman Has the PERFECT Response to BBC Accusing Women With Bare Nails...
‘Male’ Shoot: New York Magazine Men’s Style Issue Features Farcical and Freakish Front...
Clueless Christiane: CNN’s Amanpour Blames ‘Series of Events’ for Public’s Distrust of Leg...
Ms. Rachel Proclaims That Black Teen Nolan Wells Didn’t Drown
CBC News 'Is Well on Its Way to Becoming a Judenfrei (Jew-Free) Broadcaster'

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement