Leftist Influencers Note That Joe Biden Never Hid in a Catering Cart Like...
Mayor Scamdani: 'Defund the Police … Until My Wife Needs Free Bodyguards for...
NYT Reporter in 2026: What Happened to Investigation FBI Wanted Done Into Trump’s...
Francesca Hong’s Election-Day Staff Purge: Scrubbing the Crazy So WI Won't Notice Until...
Redhead Rejected: AOC Quietly Boots Fiance Riley Roberts
Haley Stevens Coins Bernie’s New Nickname—'Salty Grape'—and Casually Proves She’s the Bett...
IT'S A BIGGUN! Live Election Results on Twitchy! Primary Night for SC, WI,...
Seth Abramson: Impeach Trump for 'Operation Orange Chicken,' Which Was Worse Than Benghazi
Spoutin’ of Youth: Geraldo Says Today’s Dems Were Just ‘Kids’ When They Held...
Abdul El-Sayed Says He Gets ‘Older Sister Energy’ From Rashida Tlaib
Sam Stein, David Axelrod, Harvey Levin Also Upset for Reporters Left to Die...
Alyssa Farah Griffin Giggles Over 'Crazy Woke 1' — Forgets the Jobs and...
Scott Galloway Says Gavin Newsom Will Be Dems’ 2028 Presidential Pick for All...
Banner Year, Guys: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Owns the Democrats Simply by Describing Their...
Abigail Spanberger Claims She Had the BEST TIME at Old Fiddler's Convention (We...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement