New York Magazine Breaks Down ICE Facility Ambush by Antifa That ‘Went Awry’
James Woods Tells 'Worthless Hack' John Thune He Had ONE Job
Great Downgrade: Men Went from War Heroes and Cathedral Builders to 'Go-Getters' Who...
Dem Sen. Mazie Hirono Makes a Great Case for Why the 'No Kings'...
Billionaire vs. Socialist: Mark Cuban Schools Bernie Sanders on Who Really Pays the...
Elderly Canadian Offered Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) for Fracture — She Climbed...
Jim Acosta Got a Good Laugh From No Kings Protester's 'Very Clever' Sign...
CAN'T Make It Up! 'Country That Literally Has a King Is Protesting Against...
Democrat Shutdown Continues as President Trump Works to Make America Safe Again
WaPo Community Note Nuked for Post on Athletes Who Have Been 'Excluded From...
Western Lensman Has a Biden Flashback the 'No Kings' Lefties Applauded (Translation: They'...
Proof-Positive That the 'No Kings' and 'Stop the Oligarchy' Screeching From the Left...
AWKWARD: Dem Sen. Elissa Slotkin Pivot Quickly When Bill Maher Calls Out Dems'...
Putting the ‘Art’ in Arthritis: Seniors Gather to Make Protest Signs for Saturday’s...
Jettisoned ‘Journos’: Jim Acosta Reacts to FCC Chair Brendan Carr Celebrating Cast-Off Med...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement