They're Coming for Your Kids: MN's New 'Ethnic Studies' Program Is a Woke...
Ratio Alert! PBS Lets Us Know How Many 'People in Small Vessels' Have...
Disgusting: Julie Roginsky Goes Full Hitler on Bari Weiss
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Dem Rep. Ted Lieu Suggests 'Best Way to Oppose Fake News' and We...
Marco Drops the Gloves! State Department Sanctions European Leaders Who Censor Free Speech
Compare Crime Stats From Last Year of Biden to First Year of Trump...
Going Lower: Eric Swalwell Politicizes a Former GOP Rival's Terrible Cancer Diagnosis
Politico's Even MORE Annoying European Bureau Claims the 'Far Right' Is 'Stealing' Christm...
The New Yorker Has a Lot of People Asking Why They Deleted This...
Slow News Day: The Hill Reports That Adam Kinzinger Cancels His Paramount Plus...
BURN! El Salvador Prez Makes Hillary Clinton an Offer She WILL Refuse Regarding...
We Thought Eric Swalwell Had Achieved Peak Cringe. We Were Wrong
Hunter Biden Says We Don't Want Immigrants That Are Coming Here Illegally
Man Warns MAGA That He's Not the Guy to Attack and Will Go...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement