Butthurt in Texas: Crockett Bails on Dem State Convention, Still Furious Over Talarico...
SPLC-Funded Ossoff Suddenly Has Nothing to Say About His Donors' 'Pay-to-Play White Suprem...
Anne Hathaway Pregnant at 43: A Beautiful Blessing — And a Necessary Reality...
Shuck the Heck Up! 'Oysterman' Nazi College Dropout Lectures America on Impeaching SCOTUS...
Harry Truman, You Ain't: Victor Davis Hanson Sums Up Obama's Narcissistic Scolding In...
All Hell Broke Loose at Obama's Presidential Center Grand Opening
Seattle Leftists Vowed to Sit Out US Soccer Over Trump … Stadium Went...
The View Hags (Especially Ana Navarro) ATTACK Joy Behar for Treating JD Vance...
Knicks Fan Takes 'Steal City' Literally: Hauls Off Official Parade Trash Can
Chicagoan Calls Obamas Out Over Black Contractors and Workers Owed MILLIONS for Presidenti...
Cynical Publius Uses Simple MATH to Take Jake Tapper Blaming Hegseth for Flu...
Lefty Venture Capitalist Paul Graham BLOCKED Me for Pointing Out Dems Have ALWAYS...
The MOMENT Abby Phillip Tries Playing the Obama Race Card With Lydia Moynihan...
SO MUCH Worse: Sharyl Attkisson Adds a WHOPPER to Tulsi Gabbard's DAMNING Lists...
'Amazing'! Here's a DC Reflecting Pool Update From ABC News' Chief Algae Correspondent

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement