Ilhan Omar Brags 'I Assimilated to Congress!' — X Responds: 'Sweetie, That's Not...
'We Were Hoping It Would Fail': Democrats Grapple With World Cup Triumph Under...
Ad Newseam: Gavin Newsom Is Sick of MS NOW and CNN Being So...
Poetic Justice?: MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace Says Rhyme Is the Reason Temporary Refugees...
Lancet Study Says Elon Musk Will Have Killed 14 Million People by 2030
Woman Who Drowned Her Baby and Blamed COVID Found Not Guilty; Ron DeSantis...
Member of Trans Death Cult the Zizians Charged in Execution-Style Murders of Her...
John Fetterman Asks Why He’s the Only Dem Senator to Denounce ’Self-Identified Communists’
Evita Duffy Claps Back at Daily Beast’s Obsession: ‘I Don’t Find Fulfillment From...
Say 'Free Palestine' or Else: Free Palestine Thug Corners Cowering Scott Wiener at...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: Attorney on MS NOW Says Haitian Refugees Should Stay Because Equity...
Convicted Traitor Bradley Manning Trades Leaking Secrets for Dropping Beats at DSA Commie...
James Carville: Done Sharing a Tent With Jew-Haters … Except an Actual Nazi-Tattooed...
Jemele Hill: Is Boomer Esiason Saying Caitlin Clark Deserves 'Special Treatment' for Being...
Clown Ro Khanna Accuses Man With Chinese Wife of Being Racist Against the...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos