'Lots of Illegals There ...' ICE Agents' Responses About Helping With Airport Security...
PSST: Would Someone Let John Brennan Know It's a BAD Thing When Communist...
Bishop Robert Barron ENDS Carrie Prejean Boller's 'Preposterous' Antisemitic Claims in Kin...
A GIDDY Tom Homan Tells CNN's Dana Bash How READY ICE Is to...
Mike Lee DISMANTLES Dems' MUH CONSTITUTION Anti-SAVE Act Talking Point With Their Own...
A Dem So Bad Even Mark Kelly Doesn't Like Her? WOOF: DESPERATE MI...
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani Leads Public Prayer in Prospect Park
British MPs Call for Investigation of Member Who Called Mass Public Muslim Prayers...
Cato Director Says It’s ‘Totally False’ That Noncitizens Get Welfare at Double the...
Minnesota City Bringing Back the Old, ‘Problematic’ State Flag
Jim Acosta Whines to Adam Schiff at Pretend Hearing About Trump and MAGA...
WSJ: Boom in Autism Therapy Is ‘Medicaid’s Fastest-Growing Jackpot’
AOC Needs More Than Therapy: $19K in Donor Money for Ketamine Shrink
MAGA Allegedly Mad at The Pitt for Portraying Very Realistic Scene of ICE...
The Bulwark’s Tim Miller Asks James Talarico About the Size of ‘God’s Sausage’

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos