'If Anybody Was Wondering Why Seattle Has Fallen Apart' Watch This Clip of...
AOC Tests Positive for COVID in 2026 — and Half the Internet Acts...
Mamdani’s ‘Normie’ Act Cracks As New Adviser Who Edits ‘Gay Communism,’ Backs Hamas...
NYT Shocking A-HA: Israelis View Themselves As the Victims of the Massacre That...
Meteorologist Chris Martz Obliterates Adam Schiff's Climate Change Panic Button
Letters From the Basement: Afghan Girls Risk Arrest to Learn : Then Hand...
'This You?' Scott Jennings NUKES David Axelrod for Phony Outrage About SCOTUS Criticism
WHOOPS! Gavin Newsom Tried to Pin High Housing Costs on Trump and KO'd...
JD Vance Provides the PERFECT Response After James Talarico Names His 'Favorite' Drag...
Hasan Piker Hates America, Abuses His Dog yet El-Sayed Embraces Him and Campus...
Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI, Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...
How NYC’s First Couple Hides Devout Islamism Behind Western Clothes and Drag-Show Vibes

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement