President Trump: Iran Deal is Now Complete
Griftin' Hillary Strikes Again: Clutching Pearls at UFC While Shilling White House Coaster...
Biden Loyalist: Platner’s Nazi Tat, Wife-Beating, Pedo App & Rape Fantasies Aren’t Just...
Jon Gabriel Explains Two Definitions of America
DeSantis Deserves Better: Florida GOP Must Honor a Real Debate Before Replacing an...
Report: 12 Dead After Airplane Crash in Missouri
One Year Down, Eternity with Weiner’s Sloppy Seconds: Alex Soros & Huma’s Cringe...
USA! There Is Pride in America To Be Found, Poll Result Tweet Indicates
A STUDY for This? DUH: X's Reaction to Study Showing Conservatives Are Happier...
'So Turned ON': One of America’s Most BADASS Presidents Roars Back to Life...
'Cute Speech. CONGRATS': Mark Cuban Shuts Ro Khanna DOWN in SURPRISING Back and...
Smug Libs Melting Down Over UFC at Lincoln Memorial Get Brutal HISTORY Smackdown...
HA! Lefty's 'My Life Sucks Because There's a Trillionaire' Post Goes VIRAL for...
Get the NET! Check Out Popehat's Unhinged COLLAPSE on Lefty Utopia BlueSky Over...
Happy Birthday President Trump! Here's a Top 10 List of All Your KICK-BUTT...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement