Bring in the Bulldozers: Madison and State Police Dismantle Black Lives Matter Encampment
Mamdani Gets Caught As Grocery ID Policy Backfires
Welcome to the Party, Pal: Mark Halperin Suddenly Notices a TEENY Bit of...
This Alone, This Right Here Should Be Disqualifying for Francesca Hong... Sadly, Commies...
Ok, HAMAS: Ben Rhodes Shrieks About AIPAC (the Jews!) in Thread Pushing Abdul...
BOOMITY: Mike Rowe Responds to ENRAGED Crazies Who FREAKED Over His EPIC Post...
Max Miller REALLY Stepped in It When He Released Those DropBox Files to...
Self-Proclaimed Socialist's Reddit Post Shows How Much the DSA Actually DESPISES the Worki...
She Doubled DOWN! LOL! Obama Bros' Attempt to Give Francesca Hong a Defund...
WUT? Krystal Ball Vapidly Announces the Left Is the MOST Pro-America Faction in...
C'MON! Dan Goldman Comes SO CLOSE to Outing Antisemitic Dems in BRUTAL Back-and-Forth...
HO HO HA! That One Time Christmas LITERALLY ATTACKED Francesca Hong (I'm SHOOK!)
Spencer Pratt Lists ALL the Ways Capitalism Has Made Hasan Piker Who He...
So, NOT Climate Change?! Alleged Spokane Wildfire Arsonist Arrested — WOW, How TF...
Worst ... Dad ... EVER! Seth Moulton Throws His Daughters Under the Bus...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement