Illegal Immigrant Nashville Reporter Nabbed by ICE in Targeted Operation – Visa...
Dem Candidate Graham Platner's Fresh Red Flag: Brags About Wrestling (and Beating?) High...
Quick Verdict: Asif Merchant Found GUILTY on All Counts in Iran-Ordered Plot to...
ABC News Earns Ratio of the Day for Effort to Turn Sinking of...
Semafor Platforms Hasan Piker: Mainstream Media's Chat with the Left's Dog-Shocking, Jew-H...
The Face of Dems? Jennifer Welch's Haggard, Vulgar GLAAD Tirade Proves the Party...
Polyamory Isn't Liberation—It's Lindy West's Public Humiliation Ritual to Convince You Mon...
Time to Fight for Marriage, Children, and the Backbone of Society
JFK's Grandson Jack Schlossberg’s Shocking ‘Jew Blood’ MAHA Recipe Post Exposes a Very...
Gavin Newsom's Career-Defining Answer Goes Terribly Wrong
Here's Barack Obama a While Back Slamming Republican Divisiveness vs. Obama at Jesse...
NYC's First Lady Hearted Oct. 7 'Celebration' Posts—But Hey, She's a 'Private Person,'...
Dems Oppose the Iran Strikes Just Like Putin, So Sen. Whitehouse Wonders What...
China Sold Iran Fancy CM-302 Missiles—Turns Out They're Temu Trash: 100% Failure Rate...
James Woods and Adam Corolla Put a Mushroom Cloud Over Serial Liar Adam...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement