Lost and Tossed: DSA Co-Chair Serves Up Word Salad When Pushed on ‘Open...
'Cancel Thanksgiving' Francesca Hong Says All Her Opponent Talks About Is Culture Wars
'Get Comfy Being Ruthless,' Says Kamala — Same Party That Already Tried Everything...
Vice President JD Vance on 'Odd' Abdul El-Sayed: 'The Guy's Crazy and Would...
Bad Sign for the Left? Jill Biden Aide Crosses Party Lines to Endorse...
Attorneys General From Three States Subpoena Anthony Fauci
WNBA Commissioner Reacts to Two Male Ex-NBA Players Vying to Join the Women’s...
Hasan Piker Imagines the Complaints If Charlie Kirk Were Stumping for GOP Candidates
Royce White Says She's Getting Hate When She Just Wants to Hoop With...
Terrible Person, Worse Comedian: Mike Rogers Gets the Last Laugh As El-Sayed’s Zinger...
Francesca Hong Will NOT Like Bill Maher's Take on Her Sudden Embrace of...
David Weigel Demands Evidence of El-Sayed’s Violent Rhetoric ... X Hands Him a...
'I Think Someone's Nervous!' Gavin Newsom's in a Panic Over the Senate Confirming...
Let the Tantrums Begin: Left Wing Tears Flow As Todd Blanche Is Confirmed...
DSA Chair Proves Commies Skip the ‘Thinking’ Part of Policy — Won't Affirm...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement