NYT: Children of GOP Parents Intimidate Kids by Showing Up at School With...
DataRepublican Looks at Death Threats on Miles Taylor’s Leaky UndoTrump Website
TMZ: ICE Agents Drag Man Out of Hospital as a Mob of Livid...
Chicago Alderman Wants Walgreens Charged With 'Corporate Abandonment' for Closing Store
The Left Demanded Police Bodycams and Got 'em -- Possibly the Greatest Backfire...
Katie Porter, Fresh Off the Ozempic Fidget Fest, Says Trump Ruins Everything
60 Minutes: White Supremacists Act as 'Disaster Tourists' to Aid in Recruiting and...
Press Moved Indoors After Shooting Incident Near White House; Secret Service Respond
Liz 'Spirit Killer' Warren Strikes Again: Attacks Bezos for Met Gala While Peddling...
Connecticut AG Says ‘We Are Sovereign in This State’ in Attempt to Force...
Leftist Judge to Trump Assassination Suspect: 'My Deepest Apologies for the Suicide Watch,...
The Hill: Poll Shows Most Americans Say Trump Is Mentally and Physically Unfit...
MI Dem Chairwoman Honors Nazi Grandpa on Veterans Day — Then Threatens to...
Ron DeSantis' 'Signed, Sealed and Delivered' Florida Map Is a Lock to Mega-Trigger...
WWI and the Power of Prayer

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement