CNN Trio of Dishonest ‘Journalistic’ Hacks Lecture Public on Importance of Scott Pelley...
Harpies Bizarre: Psaki and Welch Screech Over Scott Pelley’s Firing - Maddow Wants...
Pro-Choice Woman Compares Fetuses to Tapeworms
Sunny Hostin: MAGA ‘Despicable’ for Electing Trump but Now Says Dems MUST Vote...
Jim Acosta Says He Was Accused of Showboating and Making Himself the Story...
Chef José Andrés Shown the Dinner Menu at ICE Detention Facility Where Hunger...
Polymarket: Democratic Socialist Nithya Raman Has Surged to Second Place in LA Mayoral...
Soulless: Jill Biden Snubs Hunter’s Daughter Navy in Memoir Dedicated to Her Other...
Woman Demanding $10 Million for ‘Severe Emotional Distress’ After ICE 'Exposed Her Buttock...
UFC Freedom 250: CNN’s Sara Sidner Implies Trump’s a Dictator Since Benito Mussolini...
The Face That Launched a Thousand Scowls: Trump Publicly Diagnoses Kaitlan's Terminal Trum...
THEY MAD: SCOTUS Rules Alabama Can Use Map Lower Court Judge Called ‘Intentionally...
'Why Is She Leaving? I Want to Answer Her Questions!' Marco Rubio ROASTS...
Sunrise Movement Ditches Climate Change for Anti-Semitic Pro-Palestine Priorities
Ohio State Senator ‘Almost Brought to Tears’ by Hateful Rhetoric Against Somalis

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos