Showbiz Fizz: Actor Ben Stiller’s Soft Drink Falls Flat While a Perky Tom...
Family Fright: Actor Jerry O’Connell Describes Household Election Night Terror to Bill Mah...
RATIO ALERT! Dem Senator's Self-Imposed Term Limits Pledge Just Aged As Expected (SUCH...
Unemployed Joy Reid's Wild Take: Iran's Regime No Worse Than America's 'Secret Police'...
Trump Teases: A Former President Told Me 'I Wish I Did It' on...
The Harsh Reality of Daycare: High Turnover, Low Bonding, Long Days – Protect...
Trump Reveals GOP Rep. Dunn Faced 'Terminal' Heart Ailment, Would've Died by June...
GOP Senator's Support for Unpaid TSA Workers Turns into Fiery Clash with 'Defund'...
Dem Sen. Van Hollen, Not Content With Just DHS Going Unpaid, Threatens to...
You Gonna Cry? The Look on Adam Kinzinger's Face as Fellow CNN Panelist...
Coincidence? Three Attacks on Conservatives Tied to Furry Subculture – An Insider's Alarmi...
While Hollywood Congratulates Itself, Here's a Song That SHOULD Win an Oscar
Gavin Newsom Crosses His Legs This Way to Distract From the Lies He's...
Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Came 'SO Close to a Full Confession' While...
Why the Early American Schools Were Christian

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement