Report: FBI Had 14 Informants on Biden Corruption but Ran Op to Dismiss...
Dem Gov. Hopeful Cindy Holscher in Red-State Kansas: 'No Idea If Jesus Was...
Mehdi Hasan Wonders If the Press Will Be Harder on Trump Now That...
'Playing My Own Words Is Defamation': Hasan Piker Melts Down Over Scott Jennings...
Good: Macro Rubio Did Not Answer CNN Reporter Who Asked If He Put...
Rick Wilson Is Late Getting in His Dig on Trump ‘Cowering Like a...
'Hitting the Stereotype SO on the Nose'! Pics From Francesca Hong's Farewell Event...
Ballot Pox: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Admits Democrat Leaders Pick Nominees, Not the...
Al Jazeera Reports Ilhan Omar Won Her Primary Overwhelmingly Without Support From AIPAC
NO WAY! Journos Might Have Been Slightly Over-Dramatic About the 'Decoy' Air Force...
Florida’s Secret Sauce Revealed: Crime Crashes, Illegals Out, and America’s Safest Big Sta...
Abdul El-Sayed Makes a Hong-esque Pivot and Now Loves Football ('There Are No...
AOC to Journo on Breakup: 'No Comment on My Private Life' (She Just...
Proceeding According to Plan: NYC Rents Hit ANOTHER Record High (One Month After...
Liberal Analysts Panic After 'Error' in Wisconsin Vote Results

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement