HOOBOY: Nate Silver's Post About X's Political Ecosystem Just Got a Whole LOT...
NEW WaPo (YES, WaPo!) Poll Spells SERIOUS Trouble for Abigail Spanberger and Her...
Media Accuses Trump of Trying to Sow Doubt in Midterm Election Results While...
WHOA: Thread OWNING Eric Swalwell for Nannygate Payments Takes CRAZY Turn to 'OMG,...
'DUMBEST Person Alive': Jim Sciutto Gets the Western Wall WRONG in Gaslight-on-Steroids Ea...
Apparently Gavin Newsom and Calif's High Speed Rail Boondoggle Hasn't Been Boondoggle-y En...
Fauxcahontas Shrieks About Taxing Bezos … But Still Can’t Find Fraud She’s Been...
Nate Silver Drops 2026 Engagement Chart — Then Gets Wrecked Over Communist Labeled...
Sen. Fetterman Calls Out Fellow Dems Embracing Radical Hasan Piker Who Said America...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Zoo Peeper: Victor Davis Hanson Hilariously Exposes Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s Elitist Views...
George Stephanopoulos: Trump’s Mail-In Voting EO Will ‘Subvert the Midterms, Sow Doubt Abo...
Stephen King Sweeps the Bad Timing Awards With an EPIC Fail About Trump's...
TMZ Chases Ghost: Trump's 'Health Crisis' Was Just Golf, Duty, and Leftist Wishcasting
NPR’s Outrageous Choice: Sympathy for Attacker’s Lebanese Town, Silence for Michigan Synag...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement