Ripple Defect: Brian Stelter Says Scott Pelley’s CBS News Firing Is Like an...
Time’s Up: CBS News Fires Insubordinate Scott Pelley After Clash With New ‘60...
'Minor Crimes' Doing a Lot of Heavy Lifting to Defend Protests in Wired...
Antifa Members Disrupt Council Meeting That Declared Them Terrorists, Act Like Terrorists
Senate Candidate Alexander Vindman’s Aides Shield Him From Questions About Graham Platner
Principles? What Principles? Cuck Schumer Sticks by Nazi Platner, Repeats Win Mantra Like...
Mamdani-Backed Congressional Candidate Deletes Posts About Abolishing Police, Prisons, and...
Boston Mayor’s ‘Trans Period Pride’ Event to Celebrate Menstrual Equity Cancelled
Caught on Camera: Graham Platner Flees Reporter Asking the One Question Every American...
Jill Biden Tells The View About Hunter's One Beautiful Child, Beau
It's a BIGGIE - We're LIVE! Twitchy Has the Latest CA, Los Angeles,...
Governor Newsom Press Office Genuinely Sorry for the MAGA People Miserable About Pride...
What Ben Sasse’s Battle With Death Revealed About Modern Family Life
James Talarico’s Church Funds Trans Summer Camp and Travel for Out-of-State Abortions
Graham Platner Finally Took Down His Creepy Kik Profile After 3,000 Days

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos