Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill
Ex Biden-Harris Staffer Explains Why Hypocrisy Is Running Rampant (THIS Deflection Sounds...
Ratio-Palooza! JB Pritzker's Statement on Chicago Bears' Likely Move to Indiana Gets Torch...
Bill Maher Torpedoed and Sank Dem Sen. Chris Murphy's BS Spin About 60...
P-Hustle and Bustle: Fetterman Holds Class for ‘Journos’ Clueless About Graham Platner’s C...
Respectable Hypocrisy?: James Carville Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper the Truth About Dems and...
Late Night Fun With Graham Fatner, Der Uber Grossenfurher
Rep. Ro Khanna Beclowns Himself: Epstein Crusader Campaigns for Alleged Woman-Abuser Graha...
Nazi-Tatted Nepo-Baby Just Delivered the Final Nail in #MeToo’s Coffin — And the...
The Blind Sheikh’s Defense Witness Wants to Gut America’s Defense Budget
Dem Senator Whitehouse Bankrolling Platner Tells His Victims to Get Over It —...
Matt Stoller Ditches 'HR Lady' Politics for Nazi-Tattooed, Sexting, Girlfriend-Roughing, R...
With the Bidens Determined to Stay in the Spotlight This Year, CNN Has...
Marco Rubio Faced Down a Democrat Firing Squad and Walked out Without a...
Jimmy Kimmel Melts Down Over Spencer Pratt’s Strong LA Mayor Run: ‘We Should...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement