Trump Watches Basketball Like a Normal Human, Jonah Goldberg Has a Full-On Nervous...
‘FAFO, Donald’: Gavin Newsom Signs Law Imprisoning Politicians Who Spread Election Lies
Karmelo Anthony Supporter Rages, Wants to Know What to Tell Her Five Boys
Report: Bari Weiss Poised to Oversee Editorial Operations at CNN
Another Former Capitol Staffer Confirms a Past Romantic Relationship With James Talarico
Twisted Misters: Los Angeles Chorus Has SOLVED Dems' Young Male Voter Problem With...
GUILTY: Karmelo Anthony Convicted of Murdering Austin Metcalf
Trump Calls Stephen A. Smith Low IQ, Smith Immediately Demands Debate (He Walked...
Dems in Disarray: Neera Tanden Roasts Ryan Grim as His Scandal-Plagued Buddy Platner...
The SPLC President Spat on Charlie Kirk's Grave and Instantly Regretted It
AOC's 'ALL CAPS' Dunk on Trump at the Knicks Game BACKFIRES Beautifully
OOF! Sharyl Attkisson Posts ULTIMATE Flashback Video Humiliating Hillary All OVER Again fo...
Conservative Californians Noticing a Strange Trend With THEIR Mail-In Ballots and It Ain't...
Platner Ex-Campaign Boss Drops Bombshell WaPo Op-Ed: 'I Know Firsthand Why He Shouldn't...
'They Claim to Fight Hate But Sow Division’: MLK’s Niece Shreds SPLC in...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement