Stephen King Sweeps the Bad Timing Awards With an EPIC Fail About Trump's...
TMZ Chases Ghost: Trump's 'Health Crisis' Was Just Golf, Duty, and Leftist Wishcasting
NPR’s Outrageous Choice: Sympathy for Attacker’s Lebanese Town, Silence for Michigan Synag...
Where’s Navy? Bidens Push ‘Normal Family’ Easter Photo — But Still Erasing Hunter’s...
Florida's Republican Boom: Insurance Wins, Blue-State Warnings, and Why Dems Can't Compete
Theo Von’s Barron Trump Take Exposes Why We Should Ignore Entertainers on Politics
NBC's Kristen Welker Flat-Out Denies DHS Has a Head: Two Weeks After Mullin...
T. Becket Adams Nails the Moment: Europe Disappointed U.S. Actually Saved Its Pilot...
'You Are Special': Astronaut Victor Glover Delivers an Outstanding Easter Message From Art...
Tim Kaine's Plea to the 'Humanitarian' Iranian Military Ages Like a Jug Of...
WHOA. This Explains SO Much: Check Out Who Eric Swalwell Has Been PAYING...
Jesus-Sized FACEPALM --> Obama's Predictably Tone-Deaf, Insulting Easter Post Is Missing T...
Jake Tapper 'Tattles' on Trump's BRUTAL Truth Social WARNING to Iran and It...
Straight-FIRE, Son! InfantryDort BODIES Every Leftist and Woke Right Podcastard Rooting Ag...
As America Cheers the Daring Rescue of Downed WSO, The Daily Mail Covers...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement