El Salvador President Bukele DRAGS Dem Sen. Van Hollen (Then Drags Him AGAIN)...
Director of Somali Daycare Gives His Side in AP Interview
President Trump Posted the Most Epic Troll OF ALL TIME After Arresting Nicolas...
Hot Take: Maybe Mayor Mamdani Will Help Maduro Escape Custody
Mamdani Says City Will Step in If Your Landlord Doesn’t Properly Steward 'Your'...
Somalia's Ambassador to the UN Is Also the Administrator of a Healthcare Company...
Never Fear: The EU Is Closely Monitoring the Situation in Venezuela
Scott Jennings Reminds America How Lucky We Are With a Biden Maduro Flashback
'PRIORITIES' Alert! Guy Benson Spots the DNC Taking the Next Predictable Step After...
Ben Rhodes Upset With Trump Bombing Venezuela, Nigeria, and Iran With 'No Coherent...
Adam Kinzinger Thinks Trump’s Capture of Maduro Was the Right Call
Mamdani Slams Trump's Illegal Maduro Arrest on Behalf of NYC Venezuelans (Who Wants...
Trump and Rubio Explain the Lack of Congressional Notification (It Only Takes ONE...
Let's Check in With How Lefties on Bluesky Are Dealing With Trump Announcing...
While the Left Cries, Actual Venezuelans Take to the Streets to Cheer Maduro's...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement