Common Wis-Dumb: ‘Wise Latina’ AOC Says Her Past Bad Ideas Are Now Viewed...
Hakeem Jeffries Calls Trump and MAGA ‘Extremists’ As Democrats Welcome Socialists, Communi...
Dem Pramila Jayapal Claims That Trump Voters Are Upset Over TPS Ruling Because...
Gavin Newsom Blames Democrat Messaging Breakdown For No One Knowing Joe Biden’s Many...
Jettisoning Jeffries: DSA Primary Winner Tells Joy Reid That No Dems are Safe,...
Evita Duffy-Alfonso Embodies What Real Family Looks Like — And the Left Can’t...
Mehdi Hasan Goes Full Fangirl: ‘Hard to Put Into Words’ as Mayor Mamdani...
Mamdani Stans Insist Rent Freeze Good: Landlords Will Provide Services With Monopoly Money...
Michigan Dem Abdul El-Sayed Receives Special Delivery from Blue — Contents: Absolutely No...
Jesus Was Jewish, You Copium Addicts: The Anti-Semitic Denial That (Much Like Jesus)...
Can Adam Schiff Please Give an Update About This Indictment He Said Was...
GILLIFIED! Rep. Brandon Gill Puts on an Absolute Clinic as He WIPES THE...
Americans Are Kind… But Kurt Schlichter Says We’re Not Brain-Dead Enough for the...
MADNESS That They Had to Litigate THIS: Dems Will Do Anything to Keep...
Tales of Woe Debunked: Melugin Drops Truth — Haitian 'Refugees' Were Already Living...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos