Greg Gutfeld Shreds Jessica Tarlov in VICIOUS Back and Forth About SPLC Funding...
Media (and Dems) Don't Mind Anonymous Sources for Hit Pieces but NOT When...
SHOCK FOOTAGE: Fairfax Democrat Caught on Video STEALING Vote No Info From Election...
FBI Gets Some Other Tips After Arresting US Soldier Accused of Insider Trading...
DAMNING Thread BUSTS Spanberger for Being Even SHADIER in Redistricting (GUESS What She...
Here Are 3 Calif. Economic Comparisons to the Nat'l Average That Gavin Newsom...
'TIRED of the SWAMP!' Rep. Brandon Gill DOG-WALKS John Cornyn and His (Spanish)...
If You Donate to Harvard's 'Viewpoint Diversity' Scam, You Are Probably Dumb Enough...
Hero or Hustler? Special Forces Operator Busted for Wagering (and Winning Big) On...
Hakeem Jeffries Can’t Quit Ron DeSantis — Calls Him Boring While He Sounds...
ABC News Breaks Ground: 6 PM Confirmed as Dinner Time – Nation Shocked,...
Podcaster Jennifer Welch: Dems Schumer and Jeffries Are Acting Like Trump’s ‘Fascist Colla...
A Lesson In Deflection: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Boy’s Question on ‘Take Your...
Pallywood Employing Child Actors for Its Latest Propaganda Campaign
NBC Tells DOGE Layoff Sob Stories on Behalf of the DNC

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos