Decision Desk HQ Projects the VA Gerrymandering Referendum Will Pass
Left Mad, Ratios Insane, Business Booming: Jimmy’s Famous Seafood Plays Hardball on X
Set Your DVRs: John Kerry to Make 'Special Appearance' on Colbert After Last-Minute...
Axios: DeSantis and Trump Discuss Top Roles — Supreme Court Named as Governor’s...
WATCH Special Election Results for Dems' DISGRACEFUL Push to Gerrymander Virginia LIVE on...
Rep. Jayapal Loves Cuba's 'Remarkable' Healthcare ... Cubans Risk Death on Rafts to...
Ms. Rachel, Stop Lying and Stay in Your Lane: Toddlers Don’t Need Your...
Tucker Carlson Will Be 'Tormented for a Long Time' for Playing a Part...
Talking Skit: Jake Tapper Puts in Scripted Appearance on Colbert to Promote WHCD...
Tim Walz: Democrats Would Win the ‘Battle of Ideas’ Against Republicans If Their...
Obama Bro Says Jewish Insider ‘Intentionally Misinterpreted’ Chris Murphy’s Sarcastic Twee...
Mouth-Breather Makes BIG DEAL About How SORE-EE He Is About Voting for Trump...
Democrats Dropping Like Flies: Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick Quits to Dodge Expulsion Over Ethi...
Savanah Hernandez Calls CREEP Brian Shapiro OUT for Harassing Her in DMs and...
Ghost of Kyiv 2.0: Kinzinger Gets Duped by Iran — Ships Not 'Blowing...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement