Raw Story Journo Defends Platner’s Nazi Tattoo as ‘Drunk Mistake’ — Ex-Girlfriends Say...
Harwood Sneers at Former Plumber Markwayne Mullin — Then Wonders Why Dems Got...
Impeachmental Illness: Scott Jennings Burns CNN Dems Who Claim Party’s Not Running on...
California Democrats Proclaim (Or Try To) Who Is and Who Is NOT 'Allowed'...
Texas Dem Bobby Pulido Bragged About Springing Pedophile Bandmate from Jail — Now...
Does Anyone in the Media Want to Ask 51 Ex Intel Officials for...
Woke Superintendent Who Tried to Stop TPUSA Chapter at School Shown the DOOR...
Just WOW: Check Out Alleged TX Parole Supervisor’s Rant AGAINST Metcalf Family After...
Ilhan Omar Screws Herself: Camera Catches Her Admit She Doesn't Belong
Elizabeth Warren's Triggering Over Elon Is Getting Ratioed So Hard We Almost Feel...
Dither and Lawn: Talarico Can’t Think of Anything Manly He’s Done So He...
ANOTHER Platner Ex-GF Comes Forward Willing to Spill ALL the Tea Including Some...
SNL Skit? Supposed 'Dr.' Sets the Record STRAIGHT on Anthony Case DA...
Hunter Biden Takes to X and Reminds Us We've All Got Something to...
Allow JB Pritzker to Explain Why the Chicago Bears Moving to Indiana Is...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos