Jill Biden Now Claims She Feared a Stroke — But Only After Spending...
Brandon Johnson Says He Will Fight ‘Teen Takeovers’ by Holding Social Media Accountable
Tim Miller's Blasphemous Meltdown: 'The Bulwark' Doubles Down on Vulgar Anti-Christian Att...
DHS Secretary Drawing Up Plans to Block International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities
DNC Insults Trans Community in Vulgar Response to Stephen Miller Post About James...
Zaid Jilani Wants to Know Why Graham Platner’s ‘Accidental Tattoo’ Is Disqualifying
No, James Talarico: Galatians 3:28 Doesn’t Mean God is Nonbinary
ICE Agent Shover Rep. LaMonica McIver Says ICE Henchmen Are Shoving Her 'Neighbors'
'This Is Texas, THIS Is Not': Ken Paxton's First Ad About Low-T Talarico...
Jesse Watters Reading 'Disgusting' RNC Research on Graham Platner Didn't Sit Well With...
Dems Lost It After Polis Freed GOP Grandma — Today He Showed Up...
MAD About You? Trump Compares Dem James Talarico to Famous Freckled Freak Comic...
DNC's Photo Attempt to Counter Backfire From Talarico's Past Anti-Meat Comments REEKS of...
AOC Wears Hijab for Eid, Ignites Backlash: 'Suddenly She Knows What a Woman...
Harry Sisson's Revisionist Sports History About Colin Kaepernick Gets Community Note Nuked

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos