Peak Taylor Lorenz: Hoping the 'Communist Mayor' Fixes the Cashew Cream Cheese Gap
Thom Bomb: Bolo-Wearing Tillis Drops ‘Extra Filter’ and Explodes on Trump Senate Pick...
Bernie Sanders Proves Dave Portnoy Right — Stumps for Maine’s Nazi Sympathizer
Fishy Move: Fl Gov Candidate James Fishback Marries Mystery Blonde Weeks After Ditching...
Thomas Massie Melts Down: 'AI Hotel Room Throuple Video With AOC and Omar'...
Rubio Condemns Hezbollah Call to Overthrow Lebanese Government
WATCH: Shabbos Kestenbaum Humiliates Ana Kasparian On Air — She Blocks Him Immediately...
Veterans Affairs and Armed Services Remember on Memorial Weekend
And Just Like That She Became a Meme: Clueless Correspondent's WH Shooting...
'SICK of It': Taxpayer Confronting Local Gov for Putting Illegals First Will Take...
What Graham Platner Did When PRESSED About His Vile Comments Regarding Army Combat...
James Woods Shares DAMNING Laundry List of Just How Unhinged, Destructive, and VIOLENT...
Oh, THE HORROR! Looks Like This Lil Fella's Upset With Trump's WH Comms...
Post Takes Trump/Iran Deal Rumors Apart 1 by 1 Sharing What's REALLY Happening...
It's SO ON! DataRepublican Takes a Very RANTY Subpoena-Served Medea Benjamin of CODE...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement