Systemic Racism: Brandon Johnson Brags About Violating Civil Rights Law in His Administrat...
ICE Nabs Its Own Cheerleader: Milo Yiannopoulos Held in Louisiana Detention Facing Removal
Imagine That!: Dem Chris Murphy Lies About DHS Illegal Alien Crackdown in Connecticut
Democrats Invent a Trump Affair Scandal, but Gavin Newsom’s Aide Has Been Velcro’d...
Heap Big OUCH! Scott Bessent Offers Elizabeth Warren a Free Course on 'Foreign...
Joe Walsh Remains One of the Biggest Self-Serving, Annoying TOOLS on Social Media
HA HA HA —WATCH! Never-Trumper Norm Eisen Accidentally Makes Case Against ALL Mail-In...
Hillary Clinton-Inspired Immigration Shot and Chaser Proves She Has ZERO Actual Principles
The Bloc of Michigan Voters the GOP Must Win Over
Canadian Report on Where Carney's 'Response to Trump's Trade War' Is 'Winning Fans'...
People Are LOVING the Faces a CNN Panel Makes As Scott Jennings Explains...
Don't Look Now, but Kamala Harris Is Stealing Trump's Lines Again
Scumbag Dem. Who Left His Wife and Kids for Younger Woman Calls Trump...
NYPost Has a Maddening Example of 'Criminals First' Priorities From NYC Mayor Mamdani
CNN ‘Journalist’ Spots WH Aide at Work and Snaps the Most 'Newsworthy' Pic...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement