Counterfeit Cop: Dem Jasmine Crockett’s Security Officer Gunned Down by SWAT Team in...
Suicidal Empathy: CNN’s Jake Tapper Acts Out Norm MacDonald’s Viral ‘Muslim Backlash’ Meme...
Treason in Times Square? Crowds Proclaim Loyalty to Islamic Republic, Chant 'Shame, Shame...
Lefty Outlets: Just a Guy Avenging Innocent Family. Reality: Hezbollah Ties All Along
Trump Bombs Kharg Island Military Sites, Spares Oil—Warns Iran to Leave Strait of...
Biden DOJ's Masterstroke: 'Sorry, Not Sorry' Letter for Straw Buyer Who Then Armed...
‘This Is a Case About Swinging D***s:’ A Dissent Goes THERE on Transgender...
Oh Joy: Fake Dr. Jill Biden Drops Memoir LITERALLY No One Asked For
The Cost of Real Community: Showing Up When It's Inconvenient
Cuba's 'Never Bend the Knee' Pledge Meets Reality: Now in Talks with Trump
Congrats to Dearborn: Your Mayor Just Invented the 'Tragic Family Loss' Defense for...
Babylon Bee Breaks the Story About CNN's Much Needed Format Change After an...
Chuck Todd Finds Out the Hard Way That There IS Such a Thing...
Why the Constitution Protected Religion
The Free Press Does the 'Norm': The REAL Problem in America Is the...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement