Trump Niece’s Sick Joke on Assassination Attempt Backfires Spectacularly
NAACP Says SPLC Indictment Is a ‘Chilling Attack on Civil Rights Advocacy’
MSNOW's Ken Dilanian: Code Pink Activist in Ball Gown Escorted Out Moments Before...
REALLY!? Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer Get INSTA-RATIOED Over Their Statements on the...
Alleged White House Correspondents' Dinner Shooter Apprehended and Identified
Hasan Piker Discovers Time Travel to Blame Karoline Leavitt for a Shooting That...
Scoop: Immigrants Can Now Be Denied a Green Card for Being Anti-American Terrorist...
Wolf Blitzer's Close Call at WHCD: CNN Anchor Thrown to Ground, Briefly Convinced...
Democrats Delete Racist Post, Still Triggered by ‘Clown’ Trump Picked to Run the...
Secret Service Escorts Trump Administration Out of WHCA Dinner … Loud Noises Heard?...
Scandinavian Airlines Shoots Ad Claiming Nothing Came From Scandinavia
Rep. Ilhan Omar's Husband's Winery Closes Amid Investigation Into Her Finances
Starbucks Orders Workers to Nashville: Left-Leaning Holdouts Dig In and Demand To Stay...
Tara Palmeri Won't Be at Nerd Prom But Instead at a Memorial for...
From Online to Real Life: How Twitter Built My Tribe

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement