Socialists and the City: Cynthia Nixon Scores a Sweet NY Gig After Staying...
Hijab-Wearing DSA Queen Linda Sarsour: 'Screw 1776, Let's Build a Document That Matches...
Maine Dem Freezes at Last Night's Debate, Blames ICE Shooting, Then Begs for...
Put American Students First: The Viral Indian Harvard Plea That Exposed Everything
Raccoon Swoon: Seattle Residents Hope to Catch a Glimpse of Cute Masked Bandit...
Carry On, Patriots! Navy Secretary Hung Cao Puts an END to Lefties Screeching...
Trump Exposes China, Democrats for 2020 Election Inteference
Jennifer Newsom Stumbles and Stammers When Confronted With the Fact the DOJ Probe...
Hillary Clinton Just Broke Her Projection Record While Ranting About Trump 'Undermining Ou...
Tim Walz's 'Friendly Reminder' About Donald Trump Is Blowing Up in His Face...
Dem Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Exposes His Own Wife as a Bigot...
CNN National Security Hack Gets Called Out for Bogus Claim About Election Interference...
Hot Take of the Week: Bring Back EV and Solar Tax Credits to...
Mamdani's Commie Care: Nothing Says 'Great Parenting' Like Dumping Your Kids With Randos...
ABC News' Did an On-Air Fact-Check After the Trump Speech They Refused to...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement