Distant Diagnosis: MS Now Doc Who Rated Biden ‘High-Functioning’ Says Trump Has ‘Signs...
Weird Senate Hopeful Graham Platner Gives a Weird Easter Message
The Times: 'The Psychological Demands of Aaron Rupar’s Work Are Immense'
Boston Deploys Mental Health Clinician to Deal With Sword-Wielding Criminal Who Is Shot...
Iran Scored Major Victory in (Checks Notes) Lego AI War
AP: Trump Administration Terminates Agreements to 'Protect' Trans Students in Schools
Dem Rep. Dan Goldman's Attempt to Carry Anti-Billionaire Torch for 'Working Families' Is...
Court Throws Out (Former) Judge Hannah Dugan's Appeal of Her Felony Conviction
FL Chef (Fresh From CA) Demands Trump’s Murder – Perfect Example of Why...
Aaron Rupar Can’t Rule Out Trump’s Truth Social Post as a Threat to...
In Her Deepest Pain, Savannah Guthrie Questions God — Here’s Why We Should...
Neera Tanden: It's Pretty Disgusting a Trump Ally is Using the Baltimore Sun...
Euroweenie Mocks Spiking of Military Aircraft ‘To Rescue One Guy’
John Konrad BLISTERS Europe In a Devastating Post About the REAL Reason NATO...
Physician, Heal Thyself: WaPo/Guardian Hack Lectures World That Only Journalists Should Be...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement