Pro-Trans Doctor Denies Teenage Girls Are Having Healthy Breasts Removed, Just Teenage Boy...
Report: Graham Platner Mocked Teen’s Suicide Attempt on Reddit
Knicks 'Fans' Destroy Cab Driver's Livelihood in Mamdani's NYC — Immigrant Ruined After...
Bombshell Betrayal: Spencer Pratt Teams Up With Karen Bass’ Brother to Sue Her...
Politburo Posse Poses Proudly for Trump’s World Cup Win None of Them Helped...
Hasan Piker Goes Full Stalin: Cheers Plan to Throw Republicans in Prison
Graham Platner’s Face Now Too Toxic for National Dem Ads — Even as...
PHRASING! MeidasTouch Dweeb Picks the WORST Way to Express His 'Outrage' Over Michelle...
NYT: Several San Francisco Giants Wrote Bible Verses on Their Caps on Pride...
Variety: Deceased ALF Star’s Family Remembers Her 'Burning Hatred for Trump'
HELL, YEAH! UFC Fighter Gives the BEST History Lesson After Winning His Title...
Allow Gavin Newsom to Explain Why the DOJ's Investigating Him (He Left Out...
TMZ Insider Blows the LID OFF Lefty News Directors Playing Politics, ESPECIALLY in...
'It IS Our Money': Ed Markey Goes Full Karl Marx in Claiming Ownership...
Trump Iran Deal Ignites Obama Meltdown: Prices Plummeting

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement