Catherine Herridge Drops DAMNING Receipts: Just GUESS Who Wanted Elon Musk Prosecuted Over...
He Feels Pretty! Jon Ossoff Wanted Ad About His 'Makeup Budget' GONE —...
Mahmoud Khalil Sues Columbia for ‘Hell.’ X Reminds Him Who Created It
Totally CLUELESS — > WATCH Abby Phillip's Face As Ben Shapiro Schools CNN’s...
Sexist TOOL Wajahat Ali Shows How Muslim Men REALLY Treat Women With UGLY...
Deets of 2012 Hijab Hate Crime Hoax Abdul El-Sayed Blamed on Islamophobia Have...
Middle Ma’am?: CNN’s Dana Bash Says She Sees All Sides, Scott Galloway Praises...
Tragic Carpet Stride: Actress Shailene Woodley’s Eccentric Emmy Ensemble Elicits Cringe an...
The Mitch Is Back: Kentucky Sen. McConnell Returns to Congress for First Vote...
Macklemore Dropped From Ed Sheeran Tour
Professor Who Blamed Austin Metcalf's Father for His Death Wishes MAGATs 'Happy Kirkiversa...
NYT: Whistleblower Says Federal Agents May Have Broken Laws to Find Noncitizens on...
CBS News Flies to Liberia to Show Us Hotel Where Deportees Are Being...
Enjoy Totally Authentic Footage of Gavin Newsom Fly Fishing With CNN's Jake Tapper
Bernie Sanders Says Abdul El-Sayed Faces the Same Kind of Bigotry That JFK...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos