Would You Look at THAT? John Cleese Might FINALLY Be Catching On
CNN Panel's SAVE Act Debate Goes Off the RAILS When Conservative Refuses to...
OOF: Bill Melugin Just Made Abdul El-Sayed Look Even DUMBER on Immigration and...
Abdul El-Sayed SPEECHLESS As Jesse Watters Drops Sharia Law BOMBSHELL During Crazy Intervi...
It's Time Again to Crank Up the Cringe-O-Meter: JB Pritzker Is 'Governor-Maxxing'
Socialist Angie Nixon Says Billionaires and Elected Officials Are Conspiring to Keep Stude...
Podcaster Chuck Todd Says Sec. of War Pete Hegseth Is the One of...
Rotund Antifa Agitator 'Spider Mike' Literally Gets Rolled Outside Hasan Piker Event
Bill Melugin Fills in the Gaps in GOP Congressman’s Self-Deportation Sob Story
The Cult of Total Maternal Sacrifice: Why Young Moms Are Breaking Under Impossible...
Sportscaster: WNBA Set the Table by Not Disciplining Sophie Cunningham for Her Transphobic...
Jesse Watters Asks El-Sayed If Castrating Kids Is Cool — He Replies It’s...
Hulk SCHMUCK! Mark Ruffalo Defends His Antisemitic Statement on the Paramount Warner Merge...
Morocco Makes Territorial Claims on Spanish Cities Its Citizens Invaded Last Month
SCOTUS Ruling on Mail-In Voting Has Triggered Nancy Pelosi, Gavin Newsom and MANY...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement