Congressional Dems Worry About Retaliatory Strikes at Home (but Apparently Not Enough to...
CENTCOM Commander Sinks Lib Media's Negative Spin (and Flat-Out Propaganda) About Operatio...
Yet Another Dem Trainwreck: Virginia Nominee Told to GTFO Over Racist, Antisemitic Old...
Gavin's Real Fear: Mamdani Mastering the Art of the Deal While Newsom Masters...
Mark Cuban: Talarico Won on Pure JOY & Syrupy Positivity. The Internet: It...
Rep. Seth Moulton's Illegal SOTU Guest Referenced in Police Reports Involving Sexual Assau...
Sen. Tina Smith Calls Child’s Anti-ICE Letter an ‘Absolute Gut Punch’
Spain’s MEP Is Fed Up With Women’s Bodies Being Used to Excuse Illegal...
High School Diplomas Are Becoming Participation Trophies—And It's Hurting Kids Most
Infantryman Tells Those Complaining About the US 'Ambushing' Iran to Shut Up in...
NYT Publishes Op-Ed by Guy Who Lost His Security Clearance for Leaking to...
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Unpacks the Connection Between Trump, Epstein, and Russia
MS NOW Producer Notes That Markwayne Mullin Is the Only Senator Without a...
‘I Am Brian McGinnis’: Sen. Tim Sheehy 'Created a Million' Activists by Breaking...
Ilhan Omar Expresses Concern About What Trump's Iran Operation Is Costing Taxpayers and...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement