'Fight the Oligarchy' Bernie Sanders Caught in First Class While Government Workers Left...
'No Kings' Cheerleader Hakeem Jeffries Says OF COURSE Trump Always Had the Authority...
Nerdeen Kiswani Targeted in Foiled Firebomb Plot — The Same Tactics She Defended...
Trauma Drama: Tim Walz Whines About Anguish Minnesotans Are Feeling Due to Enforced...
New Secret Service Low: Agent on Jill Biden Detail Negligently Discharges Weapon …...
Party Priorities: Dem Pramila Jayapal Says ICE Must Be Prosecuted and Illegal Aliens...
Same People Who Defended Harassing Christian Bakers Now Cheer When Sarah Huckabee Sanders...
From Match Day Chaos to Monopoly Power: House Judiciary Exposes How the Residency...
The Hidden Cost of the Senate Deal: Unpaid ICE Support Staff Holding Up...
Public Health Officials Lied, Hypocrisy Ruled, Trust Died: Brutal X Thread Conor Friedersd...
Nice Backpedal, Bro! Jimmy Kimmel's Attempt at Damage Control on Markwayne Mullin Flops...
Democrats Unleash Celebrities to Fight Voter ID: 'Women Are Too Dumb to Get...
The Olympics FINALLY Adopts a Policy of Sanity, and CNN Just Can't Deal...
Ari Fleischer and Others Spot Irony in 'No Kings' Dem Slamming Trump for...
Looksmaxxing Streamer Clavicular Arrested for Battery in FL – Gator Shooting Also Under...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement