Panicking Padilla: Dem Says the SAVE Act Will Make America Just Like Nazi...
Irish Illegal’s Abandoned Daughters Say He Should Return Home to Face Drug Charges
Hypocritical Lefties Demand English ONLY in Their Own 'Sanctuary' ICE Warning Group Chat
Gavin Newsom's BS About Calif. vs. Tenn. Gets NUKED by Marsha Blackburn and...
Balenciaga 2.0? Frida Baby Slammed for 'Disgusting' Sexual Jokes on Infant Products –...
Sassy ICE King Reads Entitled AWFL Karen for Filth, Leaves Her Gagged and...
NBC News: A Half-Dozen Top Administration Officials Appear in the Epstein Files
Touched a Nerve: Gov. Wes Moore Says The Free Beacon Can Ask the...
Trump Announces Federal Takeover After Maryland Fails to Address Massive Sewage Leak
No Kings? Tell That to Judge Playing Orwell's Ministry of Truth: Orders Trump...
The Babylon Bee Reports That Trump Totally Created a New Holiday for Hillary...
Harmeet Dhillon to Look Into Karen Who Reported TPUSA to Child Protective Services
Randy Fine Drops the Most Fl Man Take of 2026: Tapper Speed-Runs to...
Chuck Schumer Introduces Legislation to Make Pride Flag a Congressionally Authorized Symbo...
AOC Mocks Marco Rubio for Saying Cowboys Come From Spain (Ask African Slaves)

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement