What Stuck Out to Karmelo Anthony’s Father Was the ‘All-White Jury’
World Cup Tourists Find Surreal Sporting Goods Store With a Firing Range; Also...
Gavin Newsom's 'Donald Trump's Dream' Video Melts All Remaining Projection Detectors
BOMBSHELL: MI Senate Dem’s Campaign Staffer Busted in Hamas-Linked Threat Plot Against UM...
Pentagon on Lockdown, Trump Striking Iran, Seizing Kharg Island?
Kimmel and TMZ Tried Again to Mock Spencer Pratt and Ended Up Accidentally...
VP Vance’s Next-Level Fearless Move: Battle-Tested Veteran Set to Face the Shrews of...
'I've Watched That 67 Times'! Here's Our Anti-ICE Loon FAFO of the Day
ABC News Journo Reports Susan Collins Has Pounced on the Platner Allegations (and...
The Left Has Found Their World Cup Hero: a Somali Referee With Ties...
Nancy Mace Goes Nuclear: Brutal Brother-Marriage Roast After Ilhan Omar Mocks Her Primary...
Ron Klain Pivots From Vouching for Biden's Cognitive State to Whitewashing Graham Platner'...
Predator App Patron Platner’s New Plan: Hammer the Epstein Class and Pray Voters...
Presidential Pool Party: While the Left Screeches, Trump Welcomes Workers Into the Oval...
Professor Calls Military Flyovers 'Weird and a Little Creepy' — Gets Absolutely Ratioed...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement