Racists 'Essentially Achieved an Indirect Lynching' of Fabulist Professor Jason Arday
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Has a New 'Maryland Man' in Teacher of the...
Radical Is Rad: DSA Co-Chair Says Americans Will Eventually Warm to Abolishing Police...
Joe Rogan Diagnoses the Problem With Capitalism: No Free Healthcare
Gun Control Activists Including Shannon Watts Pile on Hasan Piker
Power to Account?: Podcaster Terry Moran Says ABC News Killed True COVID Lab...
Thomas Massie: It's Hard to Take Nick Shirley Seriously Until He Starts Calling...
David Hogg: If Data Centers Have So Many Benefits, Build Them in the...
British Politicians and Academics Make Cambridge University Prof Jason Arday's Tragedy Abo...
London Mayor Sadiq Khan Blames Black Professor's Suicide on 'Unacceptable Hounding and Abu...
Lawyer for Newly Indicted Mayor Who Doesn't Speak English Is a Lousy Getaway...
House Speaker Mike Johnson Warns Midterms Could Radically Transform America as Democrats E...
Cenk Uygur Visits Triggernometry to Claim the 'Worst Dad EVER' Award From Seth...
Nick Shirley Exposes WHY Kathy Hochul Is So Proud of Spending Taxpayer Money...
Giffords Org Endorsing Dog-Killing Gun Grabber Abdul El-Sayed BACKFIRES (Pun Intended) SPE...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement