Judge Who Dismissed Human Trafficking Case Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia Ignored Evidence
LIVE RESULTS: Stay With Twitchy for the Latest Texas Primary 2026 Results
Will Chamberlain's Killer Observation: Mehdi, Hasan, and Saikat Demand Jews Back the Nazi...
Rolling Stone: Spencer Pratt Is a Quintessential American — Self-Confident and Not Good at...
Zohran Mamdani Says He’ll 'Transfer Ownership' From Bad Landlords to ‘the Tenants Themselv...
Court Smacks Down Alabama Map That’s ‘Tainted by Intentional Race-Based Discrimination’
Lefty Protesters CHEER When 2 Brown Men Walk Out of ICE Facility ......
LMAO! Karen Bass Learns the Hilarious HARD WAY That an Endorsement from Maxine...
RFK Jr. Shares a Video of How to Handle Leftists -- Oh Wait,...
Mike Pence Tries Scolding Republicans About Civility and HOOBOY, Was THAT Ever Stupid...
*SNORT* Daily Mail ROASTED by Funniest Community Note EVER on Trans Woman YOINKED...
Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud: Hasan Piker Just Exposed the CCP-Linked Tycoon...
Joe Scarborough Freaks Out As Tim Walz Publicly Humiliates Himself
Spencer Pratt Just BUSTED Karen Bass Literally Filming Herself BREAKING THE LAW and...
Iran's About to Get DOG-WALKED --> Trump Turns Abraham Accords Into Accountability Trap...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement