Exposed: Fauci Dined at Jake Tapper’s Home During the Lockdowns He Pushed on...
What First Amendment? Shiloh Hendrix Judge Omitted a Pretty Key Detail in Her...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
A ‘Wish’ Squalled Wanda: ‘Journalists’ Mad at Trump Were ‘Syked’ Over WHCD Rush...
Democrats Push Haley Stevens As the ‘Authentic Voice of the People’ but No...
Fellow Americans: Trump Doubles Down on Comparing CNN’s Kaitlan Collins to Trans Icon...
NBA Player Kuzma Reminds Everyone That Just Because Mamdani Has a Mic Doesn’t...
Mamdani Should Step Aside: Let 9/11 Families Grieve in Peace on the 25th...
Mamdani’s Wife’s Bestie Just Dropped Peak Nazi Fanfic: 'Zios' Caused WWI Defeat and...
Repeat the Line: Katie Hobbs' X Account Has a Joe Biden Moment on...
When Ben Crump Shows Up, Expect Fire: Grifting Lawyer Vows ‘No Peace’ in...
Fauci Email Quote Should Have Caused Immediate Concern
Berlin Pride Attack: Known Islamist Abdul Ballout Killed by Police After Leaving 1...
Just Released: While USA Buried Its Dead, Fauci’s COVID Diary Celebrated His ‘Explosive’...
Bombshell on Fox News: Deranged DSA Leader Drops Mask — 'Yes, We Want...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement