Another L For the North: Canadian Journo Tries to Prove You Can't Make...
BURN! US Oil & Gas Association BODIES Newsom Press Office 'Pajama Boy' in...
CNN Forced to Delete Viral Fake Report As Trump Stuns Hosts Live
Mehdi Hasan's Big Trump GOTCHA About the SAVE Act Turns Into a Seriously...
Faith and Freedom 250 Episode 1: The Christian Roots of the Declaration of...
Gets WORSE --> DataRepublican Pulls the Curtain FURTHER Back on Thune, Exposes 'Handlers'...
Quentin Tarantino Going Off on Rosanna Arquette a Reminder of How POISONOUS Lefty...
Just WOW: DAMNING Video Shows People Getting PAID to Sign (and Not Their...
Illegals FIRST: Hakeem Jeffries Gives Up the Plot About Why They're REALLY Blocking...
COMPROMISED?! DataRepublican Pulls BACK the Curtain on Sen. John Thune, and WOW, This...
CNN BACKPEDALS After Posting/Deleting Abhorrent Post Framing Bomb-Throwing Jihadis As Vict...
CNN DELETES Ludicrous Post Making Bomb-Throwing Jihadis the REAL VICTIMS After X Opens...
Disgusting! Mamdani Hosts Columbia Hamas Superfan Mahmoud Khalil for Ramadan Meal at Graci...
Oh Look, Bluesky's Getting a New CEO – Because the Online Asylum Was...
'More Fun to Sink Them': Trump Celebrates as 46 Iranian Warships Become Artificial...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement