The Bulwark on Graham Platner’s Many, Many Scandals: BUT TRUMP!
The View's Sunny Hostin Declares Days of Dems Taking the Moral High Ground...
Democrats Loves Charles Barkley... Until He Names a Jewish Man for President in...
Karmelo Anthony Verdict Shatters Jasmine Crockett
Do the ActBlue CEO's Smug and BRIEF Non-Responses to Reps' Questions About Dems...
Ilhan Omar's 'Go Back' Taunt at Nancy Mace Explodes in Ironic Backlash
Here's Elizabeth Warren Encouraging Female Accusers to Come Forward and Tell Their Side...
Noted Legal Scholar Cardi B Is BIG MAD That Murderer Karmelo Anthony Is...
Ro Khanna Defends Nazi-Tattooed Candidate by Attacking Professor’s Tenure: 'We Need Higher...
Jonathan Turley Details Resume of Maine Senate Candidate Dems Are Lining Up Behind
Platner Will 'Dominate' Collins in Debate, Says Kasky — Just Like He Dominated...
Just Make the Recipes, Not the Raunch: Blue Apron Goes Full Gross for...
Chicken Coup at the VP Mansion: JD Vance’s Epic American-Made Coop Goes Viral
The Today Show's Spin on Platner's Tattoo Helps Explain 'Why People Rightfully Hate...
'Scum Attracts Scum': Data Republican Delivers a Truth Bomb Ratio to Graham Platner

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement