Law Prof Butthurt That Trump Fired New US Attorney an Hour After He...
Body Discovered Inside Ayanna Pressley’s Million-Dollar House Owned by Her Ex-Con Husband
Immigration Officials Allowed to Consider Use of Benefits When Granting Permanent Legal St...
How the Tables Turn: Andrew & Tristan Tate Busted in Miami Right Before...
Mehdi Hasan Triggered by Marco Rubio's Speech on Far-Left Violence
The AP Tracks Down Ex-Wife of ICE Agent in Its Video of 'What...
Jesse Kelly Was Right: Europeans Visit America for the World Cup and Realize...
'Abolish Rent' Author Says Rent Is Paid ‘At the Barrel of a Gun’...
JJ Watt Proves He’s the GOAT: Turns a Fan’s ‘What If’ into Beers...
Boston Globe: Woman Came to Boston for Noah Kahan Concert and Now She's...
Mamdani Holding 'Active Conversation' on Legality of Arresting Netanyahu at the UN This...
Canadian Fire Chief Opens Wildfire Update With a Land Acknowledgement, Coughing Americans...
Election Integrity Explained by (Checks Notes) Olive Garden
Marco Rubio Delivers a Blistering Speech Against Communism and Far-Left Political Violence
NYC DSA Co-Chair and Marxist Musketeer Had Trouble Conveying the Warmth of Socialism...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement