Can't Help but Notice What Abdul El-Sayed Does NOT Do When Responding to...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Tells Wolf Blitzer She's Tired of People Asking Her...
Sean Parnell Makes a Pledge to Gold Star Families on the Fifth Anniversary...
Hillary Clinton Welcomes Dem 'Experiment' to See If Unhinged Socialists Can Help Win...
DEM-Olition Man: Philly DA Larry Krasner Wants to Blow Up the White House...
Victor Davis Hanson: Schumer and Jeffries Lost Control of Dem Party, Talarico Makes...
Jessica Tarlov: Abdul El-Sayed ‘Seemed Like a Bro’ From U of M, Not...
ABC News Interviews Alex Pretti’s Grieving Family, Who Want Accountability
Variety Thinks Rosie O'Donnell Should Shatter Comedy's Glass Ceiling With Her Own Show
Active Duty USAF Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment on Capitol Steps Charged...
Mayor Agrees With Don Lemon That Gary, IN Is Being Neglected Because It's...
Transgender Inmates, Including Baby Killer, Suing State Over Lack of 'Gender-Affirming Car...
Boston’s Rockin’ Debut: Fifty Years of ‘More Than a Feeling’ (It’s Been Such...
ABC, NBC News Report on Power Outage in Gary, IN, Neglect to Mention...
LIVE Primary Results! Twitchy Has the Latest South Carolina, Georgia, and Oklahoma Primary...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement