David Hogg Reminds Us It's Been Two Years of Total GOP Control and...
NYT's David French Informed of the Difference Between Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker
Francesca Hong Spins Her Slams on Holidays With 'I'm Just Not a Fun...
Hasan Piker Tries to Backpedal on His 'America Deserved 9/11' Stance and Twitter...
Mamdani Booed Off Stage As Cops Hold Back Furious Crowd
Coco Gauff: 'Men Don't Belong in Women's Tennis... but Please Don't Yell at...
Not While I'M Alive! Justine Bateman SHREDS Islamic Scholars Caught Bragging About Taking...
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Tells MI Which Dems to Vote for in Order to...
This Jarvis Post on Expensive Burritos Just Torched Every Political Faction on X
Doesn't Even Play One on TV: Fake Doctor Abdul El-Sayed Says He 'Can't...
Amy Klobuchar FURIOUS When Crowd Boos and Laughs in Her Face As She...
Steven Smith Goes OFF on Fauci As Someone Who Believed in Him and...
Jasmine Crockett SUPER HONEST When Asked If James Talarico Can Turn TX Blue...
OUCH! Scott Jennings Puts Abdul El-Sayed's Violent 'Wish List' in BRUTAL Perspective As...
Axios Gets Reality Checked After Report on What Trump's Deportations Are Costing Each...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement