Nearly 300,000 People Comment on Rule That Would Strip Grant Funding Power Away...
James Talarico Says ‘Fellow Texan’ Who Tried to Run Down ICE Agent Deserves...
Fed-Up 'Trump Supporter' Asks Congressman If There's Any Line in the Sand Where...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver
Yes, Lefties, Red States Are HORRIBLE and You Should Stay Far, FAR Away...
Fairfax County Police Gets Ratioed Into The Sun After Proudly Announcing New Translation...
Bernie Sanders Rake Stomps During His Lecture About Which Side Doesn't 'Believe in...
Brit Lit Twit: Singer Dua Lipa Opens ‘Banned Book’ Library Filled With Easily...
Newsom Embraces Communists, Will Soon Regret It
Only Scott Jennings Could Infuriate Neera Tanden SO MUCH That She Makes This...
'You Make Me SICK, You Rotten Dog': Michael Rapaport Makes Ro Khanna His...
Elissa Slotkin Said the Quiet Part Out Loud While Panicking About What the...
RUH-ROH! DSA Activist's Scolding Thread About Lazy DSA Members Sounds Like Trouble in...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement