Four Charged With Using 115 Stolen Identities to Collect $1 Million in Food...
Sen. Ted Cruz Lays Waste to Officers From Netflix and Warner Brothers (And...
Mom Says She’d Rather ‘Take Out’ Herself and Her Kids Than Be Taken...
BOOM: Tom Homan Asks Why We Don't Educate Children About Trump Making His...
The Tide Is Turning: Two Major Medical Associations Call for a Halt to...
The Atlantic: 'We're Witnessing a Murder' of The Washington Post by Jeff Bezos
Hot Take: There Is Not a Serious Market for 'Hard News' for Conservatives
Lefty Activist Gives the Most Ironic Justification EVER for Anti-ICE Roadblocks in Minneap...
ABC News: ICE Prevented Disabled US Citizen’s Father From Attending His Funeral
Kevin Sorbo Says GOP Should Have Bought Super Bowl Ad Time to Air...
FBI Raids Biological Lab Inside Vegas Home Owned by Chinese National With Ties...
'For What?': Daily Mail Reporter Pressures JD Vance to Apologize to the Family...
The REAL Reason It Feels Like America Is About To COLLAPSE
Brit Hume Puts a Mushroom Cloud Over Hillary Clinton's Latest Attempt to Shame...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Visits Man Who Charged Cops With Knife, Consoles Him

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement