From Human Traffickers to Terrorists: The Convict Parents of the Left’s Loudest ‘Anti-Rich...
Homophobia Is Bad … Except When It’s Against Conservatives: Kimmel’s Cringe WHCD Stand-In...
Is This Photo Purporting to Show Trump Fast Asleep in the WH Real...
Falklands Fallout: US Tells Britain to 'Falk Off' After Iran Snub – Piers...
Rep. Brandon Gill Blows Up Spectrum’s Scooter Love Story: Rep. Min’s Real Reason...
We Are So Back: DOJ Revives Firing Squad as 'Most Dignified' Execution Method
Hasan Piker: Trust-Fund Trotsky Who Encourages Felonies While Melting Down Over His My...
Cory Booker Is Worried Trump Will Seize Media Control Now That Democrats Are...
The Blind Spot: Blue Collar Workers Fund Comfortable Bureaucrats, Then Get Lectures on...
Chris Cuomo: DOJ Is ‘Helping the Bad Guys’ by Targeting the SPLC for...
FINALLY! WaPo Announces Bernie Sanders' New Initiative to Reach Leftists on College Campus...
This Damning Segment on the SPLC Is Just 1 Reason Dems Are Melting...
NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real
John Harwood Gets Introduced to Himself After Questioning the Objectivity of a CBS...
Trump Made Sure Schumer Will NEVER Recover From That Mistake

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement