Guy Wearing DSA Pin Fist-Bumps Woman in ‘Hot Girls for Zohran’ Shirt
Psycho Woman Finds a Way to Paint Lindsay Clancy's Husband As a Suspect...
A Family Benefit That Rewards Marriage, Motherhood, and Citizenship
Lindsay Clancy Defense Attorney ‘So Proud’ of Jury Foreperson for Identifying Holdout Juro...
WaPo: County Coroner Confirms First Infant Death From Measles in Amish County; Shapiro...
WaPo: USS Abraham Lincoln's Stop in Thailand Was Pervaded With a Sense of...
He Did It on Purpose: NYC Mayor Mamdani Hands 9/11 Pen to Al-Qaeda...
Documentary to Examine If Elon Musk Used 'Space Lasers' to Rig the 2024...
VA Dem Party Official Imprisoned for Child Sexual Abuse Material Kept Some High-Profile...
Monster Mash?: Creature Feature Fans React to Godzilla/King Kong Film Hiring ‘Intimacy Coo...
Lay Off of Wajahat Ali, Who Is ‘Just a Small-Time Podcast Host Who...
Team Newsom Would Like Us to Believe Gavin's 'Huge' Crowd in SC Is...
Joy Reid Launches Rehab Tour for Wajahat Ali and Guest Who Called Hakeem...
'Just Perfect'! Guess Where James Talarico Is Taking His 'Grassroots' Campaign to Rake...
Fans Paid a Fortune for Ed Sheeran ... Got Macklemore’s Unsolicited Free Palestine...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement