Battle of the Bulge: Olympic Ski Jumpers Allegedly Injecting Themselves 'Down There' for...
Another Crazed Nurse Posts Anti-ICE Video, Appears to Be Armed With Saline Spray
Scott Jennings Comes Up Empty in Attempt to Teach Econ 101 to CNN...
Pretend to Be SHOCKED: New Watchdog Report Links Rashida Tlaib to Terrorist Groups
Don Lemon Calls JD Vance a Vile Human Being and Not a Real...
Rep. Summer Lee Says ICE Is Not the Gestapo but 'Regular, Run of...
Rep. Explains How ‘Dignity Act’ Would Grant Legal Status to a 'Segment' of...
Amnesty International Gets Ratioed and Wrecked Over 'RIP Fact-Checkers'-Style Take on Mass...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Asks Scott Bessent If He'd Like to Retract His...
Semi-Truck Driver Who Crashed Into a Van of Amish Men, Killing Four, Was...
Rep. Maria Salazar Tells ICE Not to Touch the Ones Picking Up the...
Matt Walsh and Other ‘Writers’ Laid Off by Washington Post Tell Their Stories
Schumer Panics As 'Morning Joe' Host Betrays His Voter ID Narrative
Even Her Own Voters Can't Stand Her: Kamala's Book Tour Stop in Richmond,...
Dress-Wearing 'Antifa General Kyle' Who Called on People to Doxx and Even KILL...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement