Cenk Uygur Has Zero Self-Awareness: Calls the Biblical Covenant a 'Psychopath’s Whisper'
Poor Stacey Abrams: Trapped Under 'Authoritarian Rule' … yet She Still Wanted to...
'No Greater Insult': Trump Condemns Vandalism of WWII Memorial As Lunatic Lady Faces...
Fever Pitch: Some Are Pointing to WNBA’s Sophie Cunningham As Trump’s New WH...
Suddenly Hormones Matter: 'Comedian' Walter Masterson’s WNBA Rule Exposes His Own Hypocris...
Michigan Voters Aren’t Buying Stepstool Abdul — CNN Can’t Figure Out Why
'An Animal Slaughterhouse': New Allegations About Abdul El-Sayed's History Are Horrifying
Jim Acosta Is Mad Trump’s Name Going Back Up on Kennedy Center, Wants...
They Would Know: Nick Freitas and Spencer Pratt Tell Us EXACTLY What Happened...
‘Hurt People Hurt People’? Cool Story, Bro: MI Jews Build a Coalition to...
Dad, It's Just ISIS: SNL Got It Right Spoofing White College Age Leftist...
'No One Should Be Jailed for Stealing Toothpaste' — Peak Progressive Brainrot From...
Chelsea Handler Warns That Todd Blanche Will Overturn Roe v. Wade As Attorney...
Chris Matthews Loses It on 'Morning Joe' As Democrat Party Starts Fracturing
Vets BODY Mark Kelly for BS'ing About 'Grandma' Calling Him About Her POOR...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement