Norm Would Be So Proud: NBC News Worries About the 'Backlash' After Chinese...
'Drag Them'! Eric Trump Intends to Sue MS NOW and Jen Psaki for...
Obama Bro Ben 'Hamas' Rhodes Wonders Why Jews Are Mad About the 'Rape...
Big Apple First Lady’s Sour Playlist: 'Hungry But Sexy for Palestine' Loaded With...
Let's All Celebrate the 2-Year Anniversary of the Most Ill-Advised Debate Dare of...
From Our Singed, Smoked Hands! Nithya Raman Wants to Ban Backyard BBQs in...
Treacherous RAT: James Woods Putting John Thune on BLAST Over the SAVE Act...
'Promises Made, Promises BROKEN': Intl. Association of Fire Fighters Just Ripped Spanberge...
Trump Strong Arms Traitors to Their Faces
Think Fairfax DA Descano's Testimony Was Bad? You Ain't Seen NOTHIN' Yet: Check...
WATCH How Fairfax Co Prosecutor Warned About Mother-Murdering Illegal REACTS When Pressed...
'Beyond Parody': Jen Psaki Finds It Very Problematic That Trump's Son Accompanied Him...
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT! Unhinged Loon Who Literally Owes His Win to Abigail Spanberger...
BOOM! Squatter Steve Cohen EVICTED After 20 YEARS in Discriminatory TN Seat —...
Prog Account Made a 'Stunning Admission' in Clip of JD Vance Describing What...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement