Gothamist: Mamdani Comforts NYC Muslims After Islamophobic Attacks
Jemele Hill's Hot Take: Blue Collar Jobs Are a Conspiracy to Keep the...
Videos of Depositions of DOGE Bros Were Apparently Posted to Make Them Look...
White Liberal's New American Dream: Flee to Super-White Switzerland
Pro-Gun Activists Hand Out Free 30-Round AR-15 Magazines Outside Virginia State Capitol
Mask-Wearing Liberal White Women Hold ICE Agents at Bay With Crossed Arms and...
French Lectures on GOP 'Slide' to Pro-Choice—Forgets He Hailed Extremist Talarico as the...
Gun-Toting Man Wearing Tactical Gear Sneaks Into Texas Elementary School
Grave Robbery, NYC Style: Mamdani Proposes 50% 'Death Tax' on Middle-Class Inheritances
White Liberal Women Now Twerking on ICE Agents to Defend Gang Members –...
BOMBSHELL SMOKING GUN Allegedly Captures Erika Kirk Scheduling Underage Girls for Jeffrey...
DataRepublican Schools Clown Who Doxxed 'Bully' Cynical Publius
Iranian Official Telling Trump His Demands for Ending the War Is 'Sounding Like...
Jennifer Welch Furious Biden Didn’t Act Fast and Fascist Enough to Stop the...
NY Times Spotted Doing Their Thing Again in Headline About the Michigan Synagogue...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement