Americans Are Moving to Poland for Safety, but They’re Celebrating Policies They Won’t...
Jameis Winston Turns His Infamous Publix Crab Leg Moment Into Pure Comedy Gold
Sen. Jim Banks Makes Case for Space Force in Indiana
Trump Intervenes After Overnight ICE Order Sparks Base Revolt: ‘No One Is Off...
The Kids Are Absolutely Not OK: Two Teen Strangers Met Online to Plot...
Hugh Hewitt Notices Where Talking Politics Is Hard
Newspaper Endorsement Called El-Sayed a Capitalist and a Physician ... Both Need an...
Kobeissi: Investors Are Backing AI
Atlantic Writer Worried the Growing Trans and Queer Movement in LGBTQ+ Is Destroying...
Abdul El-Sayed PROVES He's CLUELESS About How Medicare Works, Let Alone Medicare for...
*SNORT* Mark Kelly Stumbles When Asked If Fellow Democrat Troy Jackson Is a...
Bro. NO: Aaron Rupar Takes Creeper to WHOLE New Level With Natalie Harp...
Nicki Minaj DISMANTLING Democrats for Thinking They Own the Black Vote Is a...
UNHINGED: Leigh McGowen Accidentally Says Quiet Part About Illegals Voting Out Loud in...
Soft Bigotry Speedrun: White Liberal Women Say Black Voters Can't Use the Internet...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement