The Big Apple is Rotten to the Core: NYC Judge Allegedly Helps Would-be...
'Uh oh, Trump's Lost San Francisco': Brian Allen Works Overtime to Make Anti-ICE...
Erick Erickson Spots a Trend in Midterm Election Years
Stephen Moore Sounds the Alarm on 'Fuel Mandates and Loopholes'
Tim Walz Gets BODIED by X Users After Congratulating Minnesotans for Their 'Peaceful...
Deport Every Single Illegal Alien Possible
To Whom Does America Go to Denounce Ignorant, Anti-ICE Celebs? You Guessed It...
Here's Ted Lieu's Criteria for a Democrat Presidential Candidate and You Guys, HE'S...
Liberal Women Are a Lost Cause --> Trump Is OUT TO GET THEM...
AG Todd Blanche ENDS Angry Gnome George Stephanopoulos in HEATED Back and Forth...
And Here We GO! John Brennan's Legal Team's Actions Just Signaled That He...
HUZZAH! Straight-FIRE Post Lists Every Single Way the Democrat Party Is COLLAPSING Under...
'It WASN'T Just Fulton County ...': DAMNING Thread Shows Some INTERESTING *cough cough*...
Mask SLIPPED?! Ilhan Omar CAUGHT in CHILLINGLY Honest Freudian Slip About Alex Pretti's...
WATCH: Long Beach Mayoral Candidate Rogelio Martinez Calls on the Gangs to ‘Take...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement