Corrupt Obama Judge Demands Special Treatment After WHCD Attack
WELL, What Do You KNOW?! Jessica Tarlov's Iranian Clip Left Out a BUNCH...
Noah Rothman Takes Snot-Nosed, Soy-Boy Adam Mockler to the CLEANERS for Disrespecting the...
Pete Hegseth Delivers Warning to Islamic Regime With a Heapin' Helpin' of FAFO...
Super-Wealthy Hollyweirdo Sarah Paulson Performs the Most Tone-Deaf Protest EVER at the Me...
And Here We GOOO! DataRepublican's Thread Calls Down the THUNDER on Woke Right...
Snot-Nose Who Cried on X After Scott Jennings ENDED Him Tries Same Thing...
Justice Alito Goes OFF on Auto-Pen Justice KBJ for 'Baseless and Insulting Dissent'...
A New Dope: Obama and Mark Hamill Ruin ‘Star Wars Day’ With Cringy...
WaPo Marks Day 4 of Leftist Hero Protesting Iran, AI From Top of...
NYT: Children of GOP Parents Intimidate Kids by Showing Up at School With...
DataRepublican Looks at Death Threats on Miles Taylor’s Leaky UndoTrump Website
TMZ: ICE Agents Drag Man Out of Hospital as a Mob of Livid...
Chicago Alderman Wants Walgreens Charged With 'Corporate Abandonment' for Closing Store
The Left Demanded Police Bodycams and Got 'em -- Possibly the Greatest Backfire...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos