NAZI-ing the Signs: Ro Khanna Claims Graham Platner’s Numerous Negatives Snuck Up on...
Dem Cory Booker Shares Fond Memories of Lindsey Graham in Online Video But...
I Believe I can Fly: Video Captures Yellowstone Tourist Hurled Into the Air...
Chad Pergram Places Graham's Passing Into Historical Perspective
'These People Are So F-ing Stupid!' James Carville Posts WILD Rant Against Frankenstein's...
Report: House GOP Eyes Budget in Wake of Lindsey Graham's Passing
Mitt Romney Remembers Sen. Lindsey Graham With Ukraine on the Brain
DataRepublican Continues DECONSTRUCTING Candace Owens, This Time Taking Her Kirk Con/Grift...
Spencer Pratt Knows What DSA REALLY Stands for and BAHAHA
HO ... Sorry ... Ro Khanna Dramatically Thanking Peeps 'Concerned for His Safety'...
Never FAILS: Rest in Hell Trends After Graham Passes; Lefties Remind Us of...
'Judge Me by My ENEMIES' --> THIS Five-Day-Old Post From Lindsey Graham DEFINITELY...
'MASSIVE POS' Ana Kasparian Gets Her Clock CLEANED for Shockingly VILE Post After...
'What's Happening on the Ground' Post Sheds Some Light on Lindsey Graham's Possible...
Breaking: U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Dead at Age 71, Republican Lawmaker Passed After...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement