Trump Gloats As Alexander Vindman Suffers Upset Loss to DSA Member in FL...
That's Not Funny: Amnesty International UK to Host 'Comedy' Event
AG Keith Ellison Sues Texas to Compel the Extradition of an ICE Agent...
Broadcaster Says Racism in the Media Is Responsible for ‘Proffesor’ Jason Arday’s Death
Jake Tapper Questions Framing of an Old Clip of Him Saying a ‘Politburo’...
Iowa Congressional Candidate’s ‘Security’ (He's a Mayor) Knocks Phone Out of Reporter’s Ha...
We Are Coke State: 14 Arrested in Fraternity Run Drug Ring at Penn...
California's Nanny Bureaucrats Make Purchasing Replacement Tires More Expensive
Journo Stops Guest Mid-Interview When He Claims Israel Is Committing Genocide
Live Election Results on Twitchy! Primary Night for Alaska, Wyoming, and Florida
Axios Reports on Democrats' New Campaign Tactic: Bringing Sexy Back
DSA Leader: Group Hates Constitution, It’s an ‘Obstacle’ to Their Socialist Revolution (WA...
Boston Mayor Tries to Prevent ICE From Parking in City by Tracking Down...
ABC Files Suit Against FCC Because Trump Admin 'Has Waged a Retaliatory Campaign'...
Roll Those EYES! Rashida Tlaib Flips OUT on MI Republicans AND DEMS in...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement