Spin and Grin: Mayor Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart DSA Members Disagree on Abolishing...
MS NOW’s Molly Jong-Fast Mad Trump Is Using Fact Non-Citizens Are Voting to...
Hot Take: We Know About the Noncitizens Voting in NJ *Because* Our Elections...
Jennifer Welch: Homeschooling Is 'Inherently Patriarchal' and a 'Huge Push of the Fascist...
Mehdi Hasan Explains to Javier Bardem How Spain's World Cup Win Was a...
Why the ‘Conservatives Are Incurious’ Smear Is Pure Projection
ActBlue Fraud Hits El-Sayed Campaign: 88yo No-Computer Granny ‘Donated’ $150K (and 47 Time...
Rep Brandon Gill Introduces Bill to End Birthright Citizenship for Children of Illegal...
Fifth Circuit: Illegal Aliens Have No Constitutional Right to Roam Free During Removal...
'It Never Happens' — Until a Mexican Illegal Sexually Abused and Murdered a...
Fifteen-Year Pro-Hamas ‘Forever Student’ at Columbia to Be Deported to Jordan
Ratio Alert! Geraldo Rivera's Attempt to Make the NJ Voting 'Glitch' About Trump...
Unable to Arrest Netanyahu, Mamdani Leaves It to New Yorkers Whether They Want...
All This Dem Lying About Noncitizens Voting Being a Nonexistent Problem Is Aging...
Ethiopian Migrant Executes Three, Tells Court He Was Treated Unfairly Because He’s Black

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement