Pope Leo XIV Urgently Calls for the International Community to Advance the Two-State...
Messages Scrawled on Aircraft Flap by Service Members Show No Morale, Says Iranian...
Man Stumped That MAGA Supported Kyle Rittenhouse but Condemned Alex Pretti
White Folks Decide to Embrace the Nickname 'Mayonnaise Militia'
Here's What WaPo's Infallible Fact-Checker Was Saying About Eric Swalwell and Fang Fang...
Ex-Trump Lawyer Tells Mehdi Hasan He's Not Sure American Democracy Survives 2026 Midterms
Team Abdul El-Sayed Member Thinks Mike Rogers' Campaign Has the Aesthetics of a...
CNN Reports on US Navy Destroyer That Spent Four Days Without Power Last...
Abdul El-Sayed Says Not Being Able to Pronounce His Name Is Not the...
DSA-Welcomer Hakeem Jeffries Says He’s Against Defunding Police, Open Borders, and Abolish...
Trump Brutally Takes Down CNN Reporter (AND Jon Ossoff) for Pushing Dem's Smear...
'I'm Your Huckleberry': James O'Keefe Calls Out MN Media After He Exposed BLATANT...
John Harwood Smugly CHALLENGES Joey Jones to Go on the USS Lincoln; Update:...
Atlanta Dream Skips Anthem, Honors Abrams, Discriminates Against Mom and Daughter THEN LOS...
WOMP-Womp: Lefty TROLL Dean Withers Suddenly Hates Fake Accusations (After Years of Spread...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement