Same-Sex Drive: Dem Rosa DeLauro Puts the Brakes on Roadtrip to MA Lesbian...
Rep. Frederica Wilson Honors Nolan Wells' Parents and 'Other Parents of Murdered Young...
The Revolution Will Be Catered: X Notices the Fence at DSA's 'Tax the...
Taylor Lorenz Explains How Lesbians Can Drink at a Bar With a Strict...
‘Proud Anchor Baby’ Congresswoman Introduces Legislation to Abolish ICE and 'Dismantle' DH...
Fernando Mendoza Is the Total Package — and Now He’s Teaching Gen Z...
Nancy Mace Is Speechless Over Sunny Hostin’s Brag About Being a Holdout Juror...
Ben Rhodes Trying to Imagine a Foreign Ambassador Calling for the Arrest of...
L Is for Lie, Ms. Rachel: Star Slammed for Passing a Biased Report...
AP: Guess the Race of Second Suspect Arrested in Hanging of Black Woman
Shockingly the Network Newscasts Are ALL OVER the ActBlue Foreign Funding Scandal (JUST...
RIP What’s Left of LA: Nithya Raman Takes the Lead Over Karen Bass
Javier Milei Just Destroyed the UN's 'Arrogant Parasites' Off the Top Rope (Right...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Not Going to Dignify Trump’s Juvenile Post About the Brilliant...
Dem. Senate Candidate Begs for Kamala Harris' Help (by Staying FAR Away From...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement