OOF! Dems' Reaction to a CRAZY Confused Joe Biden RANT Speaks VOLUMES About...
Kamala Chameleon: Victor Davis Hanson Channels the Former VP for a Meandering Message...
Party Departure?: James Carville Freaks Out on Fox News Over DSA Takeover of...
The Intercept: 30-Year Sentence for ‘Transporting Zines’ Is 5-Alarm Fire for Free Speech
Socialist Sickness: Bill Maher Says DSA Candidate Is ‘Patient Zero’ for Woke Mind...
Imagine Being Amy Coney Barrett and Telling Your Haitian Children You ‘Voted’ to...
Why Fleeing to Russia for 'Traditional Values' Is a Mistake
Sharpton Tries to Script a Softball Apology for Mamdani’s Socialist Candidate — She...
CNN's Kaitlan Collins Pushes Back on Trump Rhetoric, Says Democratic Socialism Is Not...
The ‘Hole’ Story: Conan O’Brien and Anderson Cooper Once Said Don’t Talk ‘Sh**’...
School Counselor Promotes Kids' Book About Finding a 'Chosen' Family Accepting of Their...
'Banned' German Movie Inspired by Sexual Assaults by Migrants Posted in Full to...
'Ugh, Stop Making Me Feel Sorry for This Guy': San Francisco Radicals Turn...
TX Dems Drop a Campaign Banger: 'We're All Trans, Gay, Vegan ... and...
Gavin Newsom Assures Us He’ll Be Taxing Trillionaires After Being Trolled by Elon...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement