Sen. Alex Padilla Calls Out Markwayne Mullin's 'Election Conspiracy Claims About Noncitize...
Senate Dems Block Legislation to Ban Insider Trading, Citing Attached ‘Voter Suppression’...
These Christians Risk Everything to Follow Jesus
Better Off Head? Actor John Cusack’s New High Brows Raise Low-Brow Laughs Online
End Wokeness Shows How Fast the Copy and Paste Hijacking Spin Made the...
NYTimes' Defense of Hijacking Headline Is the 'Most Unintentionally Hilarious Tweet of All...
Iran's Hail Mary Plea Just Gave Trump Everything He Needed
Socialism Is Real. It's Dangerous. And They're Organizing.
Magills Lays Out Left’s Daily Planner: Condemn Cornell 7 at Noon, Defend the...
Federal Grand Jury Indicts Foreign Nationals for Doing the Thing Dems and Media...
'I Did It for Palestine': Kyrsten Sinema’s Ex Turns Her Pricey Art Collection...
MS NOW Journo Stresses That Motive Is Still Unknown After Attempt to Crash...
Mahmoud Khalil Says America Broke Its Promise — Deport Him Quick Since It's...
Find Someone Who Loves You the Way the Media Loves Terrorists: Sick Spin...
Court Halts Christa Pike’s Execution An Hour Before She Was Due to Die...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement