Chicago Teachers Union President Confesses: We Do Politics So Black Women Can Live...
George Conway Cries About Giving His Kids' Inheritance to Biden's Victory Fund
British Nationals Named Ali, Hameed, Ibrahim & Mohammed Busted Illegally Crossing from Can...
Jake Tapper: USC Freshman Loses Eye After Being Shot by Fed at Mostly...
CNN's Melania Hit Job Exposed: Elegant First Lady Pays for Trump Hate, Not...
CNBC: USDA Secretary Sent Easter Email Touting ’Jesus’ and ‘God’, One Staffer Offended
All the President’s Men Turns 50: The Movie That Gave Journalists an Unbearable...
President Trump Being Roasted for 'Dismantling' the US Forest Service
NBC News: Arrests of Illegals Without Criminal Convictions Have Risen Eightfold Under Trum...
Oregon CPS Investigates Parents for Refusing to Transition Their Mentally Ill 15-Year-Old...
Scott Jennings Blisters CNN About the ONE Qualification Anyone Needs to Be 'Credible'...
NYT Melts Down as Trump Finally Fixes Broken Asylum System — Bogus Claims...
Debra Messing Couldn't DEAL With NYC Commies So She Did the Most PRIVILEGED,...
SHIZNIT Just Got REAL: Maria Salazar Makes a MASSIVE Mistake Picking on DataRepublican's...
YIKES! Kansas Senate Candidate Tells (Hopefully Fictional) Story About Calling 911 to Save...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement