A Bad Rap? CNN’s Jake Tapper Says Marco Rubio Dropped '90s Hip-Hop...
Secret Sauce: Famous Fast-Food Mascot Unleashes a McFlurry of Patriotism at Minor League...
NBC ‘News’ Covers Kyle Rittenhouse’s Spider Bite, Calls Fiery Kenosha Riots a ‘Civil...
Councilwoman Arguing for Pride Flag in Park Says She Wouldn't Raise an American...
Columnist Says Criticism of Katie Porter’s Temperament Is ‘Blatantly Sexist’
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Outbreak Hits Close to Home: Not COVID 2.0, But Lessons...
Stephen Colbert’s Friend, Barack, Gives Him a Personal Tour of His Presidential Center
$11 Million Somali Medicare Fraudster Given Probation in Plea Deal With MN AG...
From Giggle Box to Hanky Time: Dem. Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta Gets a...
Sam Stein Overlooks Tim Scott While Worrying It’ll Be ‘Another 100 Years’ Before...
Kathy Griffin Wants You to Feel Rage on Election Day Over Arrest of...
Disney Cruise Families Stunned by Onboard Arrests — The Shocking Reason Border Patrol...
Rep. Steve Cohen Says Tennessee's Insane New Maps Would Destroy the Black Community's...
Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes: Krassenstein Canceled by His Own Side for...
The Bulwark Floats the Idea of Graham Platner Running for President in 2028

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement