UK Home Secretary Claims Every Woman Arriving on a Small Boat Has Been...
Yes, We Can Imagine Biden Gunning Down an American Civilian in Broad Daylight
The Atlantic Does 4,000-Word Piece on Haitian With Ankle Monitor Who Jumped in...
Jake Tapper Upset That His Tax Dollars Were Used to Air a Blatantly...
Member of Parliament Urges Canadians to Keep Up Boycott of American Products and...
WaPo: SNL Does a Skit Lampooning Republicans
Superintendent Addresses Hateful Messages Targeting Somalis Following Shooting at Homecomi...
Extreme Elonphobia: ‘Musk’ Doc Filmmaker Lives in Fear of MAGA Multibillionaire Despite No...
Brian Stelter Scoop: Politico Booted Off of Air Force One on Monday
Excuse Us but WTF Did He Just Say? Dual Citizenship?! WOW: Abdul El-Sayed...
Scott Jennings to Jake Tapper: Voters Should Hold Noses and Elect Ken Paxton...
NBC News: There Was No Medical Oxygen or Mask in Tennessee’s Execution Chamber
Backfire to End ALL Backfires —> Abdul El-Sayed Announces OBAMA Is Joining Him...
Next-Level CREEPY: Aaron Rupar Will NOT Stop Posting Weird Things About Natalie Harp...
Mike Rogers Exposes Very WEALTHY ELITISTS Who Actually Own Abdul El-Sayed in Receipt-Fille...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement