Escape Clause? Scott Jennings Pushes Back on CNN Dems Arguing Driver’s Intent Matters...
Ignorance Is This: Minnesota Dem Refuses to Watch Videos That Obliterate ICE Shooting...
Fraud Alert: Gov. Kathy Hochul Pledges to Expand Childcare Spending to $4.5 Billion
Here’s the Judge Who Blocked Trump From Freezing $10 Billion in Childcare Funds
Big If True: Gov. Tim Walz Expected to Resign Within the Next Week
ICE Provides a List of the Most Egregious Criminal Aliens They've Arrested in...
The Fatal Choice Wasn't the Officer's — It Was Renee Good's Decision to...
PBS Reports Video Shows ICE Agent ‘Appears to Knocked Backward’ by Car but...
Michael Fanone Says It’s Time for Americans to Exercise Their Second Amendment Rights...
Minnesota's Red Guard Moms: Blocking ICE for the Thrill of Being Told 'No'...
Mayor Jacob Frey Says ICE Agent Walked Away With a Hip Injury, but...
'Utter Madness': Reps. Swalwell, Goldman Introduce Bill to Strip ICE Agents of Qualified...
Elizabeth Bruenig Warns of 'More Lethal Confrontations' — Mission Accomplished for the Ant...
New Video Puts the Final Mushroom Cloud Over Lying Adam Schiff's BS Talking...
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek Says State is 'Shaken and Outraged' at Shooting of...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement