TMZ Busted for Photoshopped Attempt to Gin Up Sympathy for Lindsay Clancy
'Mess With One of Us, Mess With All of Us': NY Fans Unite...
Non-Practicing White: Lindsay Clancy Fan Explains Not Commenting on Black ‘Holdout Juror’...
Off Her Rocker: Smug Karen’s Seat Collapses, Legs Go Flying After Debating Content...
Retroactively Racist: Anti-‘Holdout Juror’ Online Videos Hit Differently Now That We Know...
Kathy Hochul Ditches Ground Zero Ceremony for Pow-Wow With CNN and Wolf Blitzer
Media Moving Forward With Sick Effort to Smear Lone Holdout Juror in Lindsay...
Pro-Clancy Juror Is Asked How the 11 White Jurors Tried to Get the...
25 Years After 9/11: What America Forgot
George W. Bush Is Every American Looking at Zohran Mamdani in This Pic
Hey Guys, Don't Forget It's an Anniversary for Hillary Clinton As Well ...
James Talarico Shares His 'BANNED' Jimmy Kimmel Interview and It Does NOT Go...
Wasn't an Earthquake, BRO: Buck Sexton SHREDS Zohran Mamdani and His Deliberately Vague...
NYTimes Comms Infuriated by Attempt to 'Stoke Outrage' With Screenshots of Today's 9/11...
Ro Khanna Claims He's TEAM AMERICA — Blames Bibi for Gas and Groceries

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos