Move Over for Do-Over?: Dem on CSPAN Says Platner Is ‘Obstructing’ a Fair...
Sarcastic 'Sorry, Not Sorry': MN Mayor Mocks Backlash After Ditching America's Birthday fo...
Chris Rufo's Latest Report on Gavin Newsom's California May Be the Most Stomach-Turning...
Trump Jr. Caught Something Insane at the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
First Lady of NYC Hosting $5K Luxury Islamic Retreat Claiming Mary Was a...
Former Judge Hannah Dugan Given No Jail Time After Conviction for Obstructing ICE
Platner’s Team Goes Nuclear: Dems Planning Switch Behind Closed Doors While Our Guy...
WTF Are You Even SAYING? Keith Ellison Claims He Uses 'Gender-Affirming Care' Every...
Socialist Hypocrite Abdul El-Sayed Desperately Scrambles to Hide Wealth Until After Michi...
Let's Revisit the People Dems Trusted to Recruit and Vet Graham Platner (it...
Ilhan Omar Should Turn Her Replies on Because She's Getting Help Exposing Corruption
Tape Bombshell: Nebraska Senate Nominee Dan Osborn's Staffer Admits He Recruited Rape-Accu...
Q and A Time: John Fetterman Takes a 'P-Hustle' Victory Lap as the...
Iowahawkblog Annihilates Hasan Piker: Porky Trust-Fund Trotsky Dreams of Revolution
Dems Who Backed Platner No Matter What Now Whining About Him Being Bad...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos