Governor Newsom Press Office Asks Why Republicans Hate That They Count Every Vote
Trial: Karmelo Anthony Was Asked to Leave 15 Times Before Fatal Stabbing
'How Is This Real?' Scott Pelley's Post-Firing Instagram Pic Sparks More Than a...
Report: Sen. Chris Murphy Funding Group Behind Anti-ICE Riots
The Economist Looks at the 'New' Dangerous Rhetoric About Anti-White Prejudice in British...
Border Czar Tom Homan Explains What Happens If Delaney Hall in Newark Is...
New Republic: The Firing of Scott Pelley Will 'Reverberate in American Journalism History'
WaPo: Pete Hegseth Takes Six of His Kids Along on Official Visit to...
Woman: Kiddo Came Home Crying After Being Told in Sex Ed That Only...
Obama Bro Says JB Pritzker Should Strip Family of Bears Ownership and Give...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Decides a Profanity-Laced Shaming Is the Best Way to...
Here's a Platner Campaign Update That's 'Everything You Need to Know About the...
Lefty Thug Trying to Block Vehicles at ICE Detention Center Gets Introduced to...
Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill
Ex Biden-Harris Staffer Explains Why Hypocrisy Is Running Rampant (THIS Deflection Sounds...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement