Did DEI Play a Role in the Massive Sewage Leak Into the Potomac?
From Grief to Gratitude: D.C. Grandma Tears Up Thanking Trump for Caring About...
French President Emmanuel Macron Says Free Speech Is ’Pure Bulls**t’ Unless Regulated
Hey Look! NYC Mayor Mamdani Found Spending He MIGHT Be Willing to Cut...
James Talarico Preaches to Stephen Colbert That Jesus Never Mentioned Abortion
DHS Takes on 'Journalist' Jim Acosta's Anti-ICE Dem Talking Points (He Keeps Coming...
DeSantis Backed 'Operation Lyft Off' Busts 18 Illegal Alien Uber/Lyft Drivers at Port...
Abby to the Rescue! CNN’s Phillip Leaps to Save AOC From Her Own...
FCC Chair Explains Why Americans Have More Trust in Gas Station Sushi Than...
‘Beto’ Beats Ghetto: Media Makes the ‘White’ Choice by Elevating James Talarico After...
Jamie Raskin Says Imbecilic Bigot and Fanatic Randy Fine Should Resign
Brian Stelter Rains on the Left's Talking Point Parade About the FCC Banning...
California Dem Mayor's Fiancé Just Sentenced as a Chinese Spy—And He Helped Her...
'You're KIDDING, Right?' Karoline Leavitt Asked to Prove 'When Trump's Ever Been Falsely...
All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt: Mistrial Declared in Prairieland ICE Shooting...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos