Clap Trap: Kamala Harris Begs for Applause After Joke Doesn’t Pan Out During...
Scott Jennings Brings Receipts After CNN Dems Deny Party's Pushing ‘Election Rigging’ Narr...
The Athletic (aka, NYT) Demands the Indiana Fever CUT Sophie Cunningham Over 'Turbulent...
'Do Your Friggin' Job, Lady': Superman Offers Some Sound Advice to Screeching Randi...
Neera Tanden Goes From Annoyed to Angry to FLIPPED OUT Debating Scott Jennings...
She MAD: Sunny Hostin FLIPS OUT When Thom Tillis Gets a Little TOO...
Listen: You Can HEAR Greg Gutfeld Laugh at Jessica Tarlov Insisting Polls Spell...
AY-YI-YI: CA Latino Voters Ain't PLAYIN' With Xavier Becerra and EXPOSED Lies About...
THIS! —> What WH Insider Posts About Dems' Plans After Midterms Should Motivate...
When Even THIS Fact-Checker Knows Trump Wasn't Inviting Iran to NUKE Los Angeles...
New Maine Poll: Susan Collins Trails Overall, Leads Older Voters by 12
Democrats Plan Mass Protest Against Zohran Mamdani
WHOA: Black Michigan Voters Are Going OFF on Abdul El-Sayed (Obama to the...
Su-Su-SUPER Sucks! Dan Bongino UNLOADS on Phil Collins for Calling MAGA 'Fat Guys...
He's DEAD, Jim! Spencer Pratt Wipes the Floor With Ro Khanna Who INSISTS...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement