NYT's Nicholas 'Dog-Rape' Kristof Doesn't Take Anything at Face Value
Abortion Doctor Admits Elective Late-Term Abortions Happen 'All the Time'
CNN’s Erin Burnett Looks Into 'Multiple' Sailors Trying to Go Overboard on the...
Alyssa Farah Griffin Wants Campus Protests for Afghan Girls but Skips It on...
Arrested SPLC Official Says White Supremacy Is One of the Worst Things Created...
Atlantic Contributor Suggests the Republican Equivalent of Woke 1.0
Trump Weighing Kari Lake, Scott Jennings, and Spencer Pratt As Possible Replacements for...
Adam Kinzinger Says ICE Using Non-Lethal Shock Gloves Feels a Bit Communist
Electrifying News! DHS Plans to Equip ICE Agents With Non-Lethal Shock Gloves
Transphobic ‘Comedian’ Tells NBA Stars to Chemically Transition or STFU
Scott Jennings Hilariously DROPS Abdul El-Sayed and His 'Football Challenge' With a Single...
MI AG Charges Noncitizens for Doing What the State's SOS Assured Everybody Could...
Marco’s Montage: White House Gifts Rubio a Framed Collage of His Popular ‘Realizing’...
We Just Figured Out Abdul Sucks, We Just Figured Out Abdul Sucks ......
Tim Miller Is VERY Concerned About Our Clean, Crime-Free 'Dystopian' Nation's Capital

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement