El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic
Venezuelan Shot and ‘Denied Urgent Medical Care’ Released From Hospital
Sit This One Out, Slick: Gavin Newsom Tries to Hop on the Trump...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement