NYC's 'First Lady' Used N-Word, Praised Terrorist Hijacker, and Cheered Intifada in Dorman...
Sen. Mark Kelly Is Still Hassling Pete Hegseth About His ‘Illegal’ No Quarter...
Kat Abughazaleh's Opponent Hit With #MeToo Allegation on Eve of Dem Primary
John Brennan's Assessment of Tulsi Gabbard's Testimony Might Be the Least Self-Aware Thing...
Biden's Oval Office Bust Honored a Man Now Accused by NYT of Repeat...
Rep. Jamie Raskin Declares Thomas Paine Was an Undocumented Immigrant
Polymarket's New DC Bar: Monitor Iran, Bet on Elections, and Get 15 Beers...
NAILED It! John Fetterman Names Who (and What) Is the True Leader the...
James Talarico Spox Posts Official Statement Regarding ‘Vegan Accusations’
Pen and Paper Make a Comeback: Parents Demand School Choice to Escape Screen...
From Foe to Fan? Mark Cuban Defends TrumpRx as a Real Step Forward...
'ELON WINS'! Let's Check on How Tim Walz's Mocking of Tesla's Stock Drop...
Rand Paul Betrays Trump, Tries Sinking DHS Nominee Markwayne Mullin
CNN's Numbers Guy Has a Reality Check for TDS Crowd Claiming Trump Supporters...
Hochul Begs Billionaires to Come Home— Iowahawk Counters with Bounty for Every 'Fugitive'...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement