Hoods in the Neighborhood: Mamdani’s Tenant Director Says Private Homeownership is 'White...
Facial Tensions: X Users React to CBS News’ Margaret Brennan’s Cringey Contorting Countena...
Venezuela Vexed: Chuck Schumer Was Fired Up for Maduro's Removal Until Trump Made...
The EU's Official Statement on De-Maduroing Venezuela Is as Useless as You'd Expect
Leo Terrell: 'Democrats Are Lying to Americans'
Cory Booker Using the Constitution to Shame Congress Over Maduro Raid Is Just...
Venezuela Libre! Maduro's Arrest Has Venezuelans Around the World Dancing in the Streets
Jonathan Turley Comments on the Use of Military Forces Without a War Declaration
'ABSURD'! Marco Rubio OWNS Margaret Brennan in HEATED Back and Forth Over Trump's...
WATCH Chris Murphy's FACE When Dana Bash (Yes, That Dana Bash) Calls Him...
'The Irony. The SIZZLE': Hilarious Thread Highlights the BEST Satirical Posts Following Fa...
2026: Happy New Year to America's 250th Birthday
BREADCRUMBS: Asra Nomani Exposes Who Organized and FUNDED Pro-Maduro Demonstrations in MUS...
Drew Holden Drops HUGE Maduro Receipt Right on 'Pack of No-Good Grifters' aka...
BOOM! Venezuelan Journo Straight-Up NUKES Mouth-Breathers Defending Maduro Because They Ha...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos