People Can't Help but Notice Where Kamala Harris Did NOT Record Her 'Gas...
HRM: Deadbeat Jerks at The Lincoln Project Have Some 'Splainin' to Do About...
Antisemites UNITE! Ilhan Omar Praises Candace Owens and I'd Only Be More Surprised...
Missing Scientists with Classified Secrets Spark Espionage Fears – Trump Launches Urgent I...
Journo Who Failed to Expose Swalwell Because it Wasn't Her Beat Makes Things...
Gun-Grabber Group Pres. BODIED for IGNORING That Justin Fairfax Was ALSO a Gun...
Traitors in the House: GOP Defectors Shield 350,000 Haitians from Trump's Deportation Orde...
Ruben Gallego Is Looking for a New Staff Member and I Have Just...
Chuck Todd Gives Pete Hegseth a 'Poser Complex' Diagnosis As Irony Detectors Explode
US Oil & Gas Association Takes Kamala Harris APART in GLORIOUS Post for...
New Footage Catches Gavin Newsom Pay for 'Transgender' Illegal Alien Sex Change Surgeries
HA! You Can SEE the Actual Moment Scott Jennings CRUSHES David Hogg's Soul...
Dem Sen. Mark Warner's Claim That Tulsi Gabbard Is Criminalizing 'Dissent' Isn't Going...
Dems Who Are Otherwise Smarter and More Observant Than the Rest of Us...
DESPICABLE: Media/Left Try Tying Catholic Charities Cuts to Trump/Pope Dispute (Fail SPECT...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement