‘Circle Back’ Psaki Preaches the Value of Media Asking Tough Questions to ‘Hold...
Actor Wallace Shawn: You Can't Be More Evil Than What the Israelis Are...
BBC: Bare Nails Trend Perpetuates White Supremacist Standards of Beauty
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Play With...
Americans Are Not McLovin’ It: Russia Hits McDonald’s Warehouse Near Kyiv — Twice
Britain Naturalized a Hamas Bodyguard, and He Planned a Mass Attack on Jews...
Ms. Rachel Blasts ‘Christian Hypocrisy’ While Ignoring Who Actually Gives More to Charity
Sunny Hostin Explains That As a Black Woman in the US, Her 'Average'...
PhD’s Heart Breaks for Marine One Pilot Being Yelled at by Trump
The Rent-A-Mob Clocked in Again: Palestinian Flags Appear at Google’s Anti-AI Protest
Report: Black Woman's 'Lynching' Was Staged After She Was Killed During Drug Dispute
CNN's Jake Tapper Reports That Trump's 'Outside Advisors' Are Telling Him to Declare...
Female App State Student Arrested for Threatening to Massacre Viewers of ‘We Will...
'Moderate' Rep. Ro Khanna Calls for Release of Convicted Murderer and Terrorist From...
In the Toronto Star’s Latest Fever Dream, the U.S. Invades and Canada Turns...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement