David Axelrod: 'Americans Didn't Like This War From the Start'
OOF! Hunger Strike Hero Greg Casar Tried Taking on RFK Jr., and That...
Oklahoma City Bombing Remembered 31 Years Later
IRONY! After Smearing Kash Patel, The Atlantic Announces That We Live in Nazi-Occupied...
Sen. Mike Lee Cites Poll About Voting Identification
Media Photographer's Awkward Trump Pic Kind of Makes Trump Look Awesome
OOPS: Tim Kaine ACCIDENTALLY Explains WHY Virginia Redistricting Is WRONG and Unfair While...
Bill Maher Takes Former Biden Lackey to the Cleaners in FIERY Debate About...
WHOA: TMZ Actually MOCKS Ilhan Omar's Claim That OOPSIE Her Accountant Made Her...
Kamala Harris Throws Epic Tantrum Over Trump’s Iran Stance – Trips Over HERSELF...
OJ- REALLY?! Former Obama Adviser LOCKS DOWN After Making Violently RACIST Comments About...
Since We ALREADY Know About Swalwell, NOW POLITICO Can Share Deep-Dive They Could've...
SHOCKA! Atlantic 'Journo' Behind HOAX-Y Hit Piece on Kash Patel Has History of...
Joyce Carol Oates: Trump Likely Embarrassed Because His Assassination Attempt ‘Looked So A...
Unhinged Philly Mayor Asks Uber and Lyft How Dare They Tell Her How...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement