Sen. Chris Van Hollen Adds 'Went Through a Rough Period' *Exception to Having...
Ron DeSantis Made Sure Nobody Will Take Hakeem Jeffries Seriously Again
The GOP Chairman Growing His Party in 80/20 Democrat Silicon Valley
The Man, the LEGEND: Check Out What Trump JUST DID to Anti-Ice May...
He's a MONSTER: Senate Republicans' Ad Featuring Graham Platner's Own POSTS Is Honestly...
LOL! Straight In Our VEINS: WATCH What Saxophonist Does While Listening to Kamala...
Olivia Julianna Claims Scott Jennings GLARED at Her for Being in the Same...
Compare Tim Walz Portraying Trump and Musk As Nazis to Who He's Campaigning...
X Account Using Grok to Explain SCOTUS Ruling to Ilhan Omar As if...
'Reeks of Jealousy'! Scott Jennings Swatted Down a MeidasTouch Lefty and Jim Acosta...
In RUSH to Scold SCOTUS on Ethics, Rashida Tlaib TRIPS Over Her Own...
BRING IT, Commie: Jessica Tarlov THREATENS GOP That if They Don't Stop Fighting...
Stand Back, He's GONNA BLOW! Marc Elias Continues Multi-Day CRASH OUT Over SCOTUS...
Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin Claimed SCOTUS Is Gerrymandered and MS NOW Was Totally...
DAMN! Scott Jennings UNLOADS on MeidasTouch Gnat for Wagging His Finger in His...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos