Science Journal Nature Says the Death of Fabulist Jason Arday 'Must Prompt Deep...
Scuzzy Documentarian Rips Elon Musk: Momma Musk and Others Respond
Police Say Immigrant Who Killed Two Antifa Members Was Hunting Gay Men
Teen Who Built Bombs to Blow Up ICE Agents Sentenced to Probation
Sociopath Celebrates Stabbing Death of New Mom Who Took a Job at an...
We Used to Be a Village. Now We Call the Cops on a...
Jemele Hill Doubles Down on Her Claim That Capitalism Is Tied to White...
Bernie Sanders Introduces Legislation to Pause AI Development in US Immediately
Hakeem Jeffries Says Pete Hegseth Will Be Held Accountable for Lawless Strikes on...
Cato Stooge Tells Congress It Created Illegal Immigration by Making Legal Immigration 'Imp...
CNN's Burnett Talks to NJ Governor About Trump's Baseless Claims on Noncitizens Registered...
James Woods Has a Few Choice Words for George Clooney About Mark Ruffalo...
JD Vance Drops a Truth Bomb About What's REALLY at Stake (Dems Will...
Thomas Massie Blocked Me From His OFFICIAL Account and All I Got Was...
Milo Calls HIMSELF a Persecuted Human Rights Icon After Being Deported and Jokes...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement