Tudor Dixon 'Hey Girling' MI-Hating Mallory McMorrow for Trying to Ignore Her Now-Deleted...
While Dems Clutch Pearls Over Map of 'What SCOTUS Enabled' in Southeast, Take...
We Didn't Think Anyone Could Crash and BURN As Much As Katie Porter...
Ron DeSantis ROASTS Hakeem Jeffries' Attempted Tough Talk With Reality Checks (and a...
Senate Judiciary Democrats Act Like New Districts SCOTUS' Ruling Could Create Is a...
HAA! Scott Jennings Taking PITY on POOR Obama for Having to Flip-Flop on...
Oh Honey, NO: Amy Klobuchar REALLY Stepped in It Gushing Over Kagan Pushing...
Try and Make Sense of Hakeem Jeffries' Dueling Narratives About Ron DeSantis' Florida...
CNN Cuts CLIP of Democrat RIGHT Before He Fantasizes About Executing Pete Hegseth...
Elizabeth Warren's Effort to Convince Americans SCOTUS Crushed Their Right to Vote Gets...
Unleash HELL! Smug Harvard Prof Goes After Ben Sasse About Babies and WOW,...
'Lost': MS NOW Asked Young WI Peeps to Describe the Democratic Party in...
JB Pritzker Trips Over a Stack of Maps While Slamming SCOTUS' Racial Gerrymandering...
PULVERIZED! Scott Jennings BLISTERS CNN Analyst Claiming GOP Would NEVER Elect a Black...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is One the Most Powerful People in the Country So...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos