Veterans Occupy US Capitol to Protest War in Iran, Genocide in Gaza
USA Today Does Puff Piece on ‘Poetic’ Mission of Fired Amnesty-Happy Immigration Judge
Venezuelan Family Who 'Followed the Rules' Leaving the US After Being Detained
BBC Investigates Insider Trading Suspicions 'Looming' Over Trump's Presidency
'Anti-Billionaire Progressive Group' Shatters Irony Detectors After Endorsement in Calif....
Repeat This When Republicans Frustrate You: In a Two-Party System, Opting Out Is...
Dancing MI Senate Candidate Enters Dem Convention With Drumline and Giant Head
MI Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Torches His Campaign with Attacks on Usha Vance...
Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud: Ex-Obama US Attorney Mocks Kash Patel’s Odds...
Report: Minnesota High School Renovation Includes Prayer Rooms, Foot-Washing Stations
Leftists Cry Over Florida Ending Taxpayer-Funded Junk Food for SNAP Recipients
Ted Lieu Makes Up a Law to Accuse President Trump of Threatening War...
Tomi Lahren Gets Andy Beshear’s Panties in a Bunch by Warning He’s a...
Podcast: Retired CIA Analyst Says Trump Tried to 'Use the Nuclear Codes' on...
The Most American Idea Nobody Talks About

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement