Owner of Tiny Variety Store Convicted of Trafficking $7 Million in Food Stamp...
Hot Take: Japanese-American Relations on Twitter Got a Lot Warmer
Townhall's Kurt Schlichter Says Not to Freak Out When We Lose the Birthright...
This Isn’t Asylum — It’s Why We Can’t Let Democrats Win Again
NASA Administrator Shares a Seriously Bada** Photo of the Artemis II Liftoff ('MERICA!)
Strong Voice Against Trumpism Notes Ivanka Trump Wasn’t a Citizen When She Gave...
The Verge Argues That the Artemis Moon Base Project Is 'Legally Dubious'
April Fool's Day Fun: Police Introduce Elite Unit of SAUSAGE Dogs
This Kid Gets It! One ... Ahem ... Outspoken Youngster Tells CNN Exactly...
Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
Former City Councilman Sentenced After Investigation Found 71 Voter Names Registered to Hi...
California's First Partner Wants to Hold Tech Leaders Responsible for 'Jordan Peterson-Typ...
Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement