Fatal Injection: Socialist Says ‘Nursing Is Political’ and Doesn’t Start or Stop in...
Texas Two-Step: Some of Dem James Talarico’s Lies Require Extra Effort to Unravel...
No Agenda. No Ideas. Just Impeachment: Crow Brags Democrats 'Won’t Hesitate' If They...
AI Causes Concerns, Polls and Common Sense Show
Ohio’s Dem Gov Candidate Amy Acton Screeches 'You Can’t Buy Us!' at Vivek...
Laura Ingraham Slaps Globalist Media
Welcome to the FO Phase: Nike Is Getting Removed From S&P 100 After...
One Bright Spot in a Brutal Cycle: New Hampshire Dems Admit They’re Losing...
Kurt Schlichter Boils Down What Packing SCOTUS Means
JB Pritzker, Hyatt Heir and Professional Non-Worker, Would Like a Word About Your...
Things Must Really SUCK for Jon Ossoff and James Talarico If They're DESPERATE...
'STEAL ELECTIONS!' Post Asks X to Name ONE Thing Democrats Do Better Than...
Chris Murphy Thought Peeps Would Be IMPRESSED by Him Taking a Walk. LOL-WOOF....
Therapy's Cheaper, Babs: Barbara Comstock's Insane Rant About DESTROYING All Things Trump...
Oh, the BACKLASH! Wajahat Ali Tries Blaming ISRAEL While Lefties Drag Him for...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement