Swimming Fool: All Wet MS NOW Contributor Confuses Reflecting Pool With a Water...
Family of English Woman Killed by African Asylum Seeker Told to ‘Tone Down’...
‘America’s BS Detector’ Claims 400,000 Were Killed in Revenge for October 7
Miami Just Got Stormed by Kilts, Bagpipes, and Brazilian Whistles
Blaming Musk: Ro Khanna and Chris Van Hollen Warn USAID Cuts Will Kill...
Illegal Alien Mother Sues Government Over Anxiety, Hair Loss After Masked ICE Agents...
WaPo: DOJ Will Appeal 'Her' Sentence to Keep Would-Be Assassin 'Sophie' Roske Behind...
Boston Middle School Sorry for Triggering Muslim Students With FACTS About Six Million...
Mehdi Hasan Notes Elon Musk Has Not Posted About White Child Sex Offender
Full Commie Trainwreck: NY Dem Brad Lander Embraces Radical Islamists, Hopes to Join...
Podcaster Airs Pro-Life Congresswoman’s Ectopic Pregnancy Story Despite Her Request Not To
CA State Senator Wiener Accuses Bible of Rainbow Hijacking – Because History Started...
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Using Database to Ensure Noncitizens Can’t Vote
Judge Finds That DOJ Investigation of Tim Walz Was Politically Motivated; Gavin Newsom...
Trans-WHAT-icide? Chicago's Brandon Johnson Invents a Whole New Word to Deflect From His...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement