HOO and BOY: You HAVE to See This MORONIC Rant From Tammy Duckworth...
BREAKING: SCOTUS Shares Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
Sanity WINS! Supreme Court CAN Define a Woman, Rules to Protect Women's Sports
FUME: Dem Rep. Melanie Stansbury Claiming the Great American State Fair's Empty? Backfired...
Forever Lost: Stephen A. Smith Says Establishment Dems Must Win Back Voters From...
Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...
Man Arrested for Shooting Participants in the World Naked Bike Ride with a...
Several States Will Not Send an Official Delegation to the Great American State...
CATO Simp Notes That Agent Who Shot Renee Good Has Never Been Charged...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Repeals Ban on Adult Bathhouses in Honor of Pride...
Nate Silver Looks at Sales Figures for Dr. Jill Biden’s Memoir
Brad Lander's Jewish Blind Spot: Whitewashing Mamdani's Wife's Jew-Hatred for Political Su...
Nicholas ‘Dog Rape’ Kristof Names Children Who Have Died From Elon Musk’s Aid...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement