Mehdi Hasan Flips Out on Dana Bash for Telling the TRUTH About Hasan...
Mexican Illegal Thought It Was a Good Idea to Try to Interfere With...
Los Angeles Socialist Nithya Raman Brags About Getting Crosswalk Done, There's Just ONE...
Scott Jennings Makes Rep. Debbie Dingell Crushing on Hasan Piker Look Even WORSE...
Small Businesses Are Quietly Doing Something Nobody Notices
AWW! No Fair! Reason Why North Hampton Yacht Elites Can't Party Anymore Is...
NYC Immigrant Grocers Are Now Officially Living in the JOY That IS Socialism
Wells Fargo Exec Liked Death Threat on Corey DeAngelis' Family Pic — NOW...
Ro Khanna Tries TRASHING Former Bernie Sanders Jewish Staffer, THEN the Staffer Shows...
Sleep TIGHT, Virginia! Fairfax County Stings 9 Child Predators BUT This Is Steve...
Hot for HAMAS?! Rep. Dingell GUSHES Over Piker's MUSCLES After Raging at Media...
N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas Wins OK Dem Nod — Then Goes Viral for Video...
UK Home Office Offers Mental Health Services for Staffers Who Fear the Sight...
Rep. Ro Khanna Calls Mark Ruffalo ‘One of the Great Humanitarians of Our...
Brian Krassenstein Deletes Post Announcing His Donation to a Designated Terrorist Organiza...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement