Five-Card Dud: Trump Gloats As George Conway Gambles Away Millions in Crowded NY...
Socialism Surge: Scott Jennings Warns a Wave of Mamdani-Like Dem Candidates Could Wash...
Raze the Roof: Van Jones Says Socialist Primary Victories Signal Collapse of the...
Majority Muslim City Council in Michigan Bans the Pride Flag on Public Property;...
Atlantic Editor: Mike Lee Is a Monster for Not Caring About 1 Million...
Fetterman Warned It — Dirtbag Left on the March as Socialists Win Big...
Popehat Banned from Bluesky Over Bizarre Musk Assassination Missive
John Cornyn Credits US’ Traditionally Welcoming Immigration System for Successful Soccer T...
'Journalist' Sara Higdon Fact-Checked After Attacking Kash Patel's Girlfriend for Singing...
Antifa Terrorists Who Led ‘Noise Demo’ (With Guns) on ICE Facility Sentenced to...
Radical Hospitality? Poetica Coffee Owner FAFO: $400K Tax Deadbeat, 9/11 Truther, and Dan...
Judge Sides With Rioters, Says Safety Fence Around Federal Building Tramples Their Free...
LIVE Election Results With TWITCHY! Primary Night in New York, Maryland, and South...
SCOTUS: Rastafarian Can’t Sue Prison Guards for Shaving His Dreadlocks (Scott Wiener Whine...
SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement