Peter Baker TRIPS on Old Post While Clutching Pearls Over State Dept. Nominee...
A Shaken Democrat Party Dusts the Cobwebs Off Nancy Pelosi to Stir Up...
Daily Beast Breaking News Intern: Pete Hegseth Targets Rite of Passage for Young...
CBS Austin: Teen Says She Was Threatened With a Taser During Anti-ICE Walkout
Karen Files Report With CPS After Turning Point USA Holds a Recruiting Event...
US Border Patrol Has a Valentine's Day Post GUARANTEED to Trigger the Loony...
Fat Dork Is New Leftist Hero for Taking a Swing at Classmate Holding...
WaPo’s Review of Video Appears to Contradict Indictment’s Claims About Don Lemon’s Actions
Mehdi Hasan Can’t Think of a MAGA Congressman Who Could Match AOC’s Rhetorical...
Check Out the Birthday Party Former Councilwoman Who Pleaded Guilty to COVID-19 Fraud...
Mark Ruffalo Circulates Petition to Award Minneapolis the Nobel Peace Prize
ABC News' Jon Karl Taken Aback That Kristi Noem Said 'the Right People'...
Rep. Sarah McBride Speaks at Hillary Clinton’s ‘Fundamental Rights for Women’ Panel
NY Times Grabs a Mop for Media's 'Clean Up in Aisle AOC' After...
Minnesota DFL Gets Ratioed Into the Sun After Complaint About What the ICE...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement