It's Official. Jon Stewart Has Become a Caricature of Himself (WATCH)
'He's SPIRALING': Gavin Newsom Goes From Bad to WORSE in Clip RANTING About...
WEIRD AF: James Talarico Takes Creep Factor Up to a 10 in Bizarre...
CNN Tries Hard Not to Wreck AOC and Other Dems' False Narratives About...
Brit Hume Has the PERFECT Response to Clancy Juror's Brag About Putting GIRL...
BOOM! James Talarico Demands Racism Condemnation From Ken Paxton — What Happened Next...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Dem Dropout: Scott Jennings Brutally Reminds Mallory McMorrow That Disavowing Hasan Piker...
Devlin on Trial: Juror Says Pro-Lindsay Clancy Women on Panel Had Ulterior Motive...
Propaganda Playbook: Jimmy Kimmel and James Talarico Dust Off Old Colbert Script for...
The Resistance, Distilled: Man Attacks a Doll Because JK Rowling Still Won’t Pretend...
On the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, Treacherous Duo Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib...
WI 'Political' Journo Deletes UGLY Posts About Tom Tiffany's Emergency Water Landing (Got...
Sen. Ron Johnson Brings Further Evidence of Virus Cover-Up
'Birthing Person' Jones Tried to Smear XX-XY's Jennifer Sey and It Was a...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement