Psycho Podcaster Reminds Ryan James Girdusky What He Was Banned From CNN For
Let The Apple Cider Vinegar Memes Flow
Juliette Kayyem Thinks MN Pushback Was Successful Because It Gave People Something to...
Debunking the Viral '12 Shot by Trump's ICE Force' Meme: Pattern = Attack...
Bill Melugin Says Democrat Demand Would 'Cripple Any Hopes of Mass Deportations'
Attorney General Candidate Explains How He’s Going to Kill Donald Trump
Duckworth Bites Off More Than She Can Chew: Rubio Schools Interrupting Senator in...
Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Doing Everything But 'Legally Observing'
Katie Pavlich Calls AP Post on Citizen Shot by Border Patrol ‘Outrageously Misleading’
Molly Ringwald to GOP: You'll Be Tried as Nazi Collaborators – Pretty in...
Liberal Alerts Us to Nationwide General Strike on Friday, Like Last Friday's
Nurse Who Called for Paralyzing and Poisoning ICE Agents Sent Packing
Podcaster Armand Domalewski Steps on ANOTHER Giant Rake With Failed 'Both Sides' Meme
Ilhan Omar’s Reaction to Being Sprayed With Unknown Substance Compared to Trump’s Shooting...
From 'Kidnapped by ICE' to Handcuffs: Bananas & Rice Lady Nasra Ahmed ARRESTED...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement