Dem Jasmine Crockett Responds to Colbert Show Hoax That Boosted TX Senate Primary...
UK Classifies 'Cultural Nationalism' as an Extreme Right-Wing Terrorist Ideology
Family Blasts Canada's 'Cult of Death': 26-Year-Old Euthanized Over Depression—Not Termina...
Congressman Asks MS NOW Panel Why Trump Lied About Kicking Jeffrey Epstein Out...
Thank God for Enes Kanter Freedom: The US Cheers as Traitor Eileen Gu...
CNN Documentary to Examine Rise and Radicalization of Christian Nationalism This Sunday
AOC's Taiwan Ted Talk: 20 Seconds of Pure 'Um' Hell – JD Vance...
Minneapolis Activists Openly Train on Jury Nullification to Block Convictions in Anti-ICE...
AP: Judge Rules US Can't Take Maryland Man Kilmar Abrego Garcia Back Into...
Hypocrisy Alert: Atlantic Downplays Epstein Conspiracy, Ignores Owner's Ties to Ghislaine...
Minneapolis Looks to Delay Renewing Liquor Licenses for Hotels That Housed ICE
Acosta Goes Nuclear: 'Why Is a Baby Detained by ICE?'—Ignores Mom's Illegal Status...
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani Looking at $5.4 Billion Budget Gap and Higher Taxes...
The Shooting In Rhode Island Proves A Disturbing Trend Is Happening In Our...
NBC News: Rep’s Anti-Muslim Post Prompts ‘Major Islamic Civil Rights Group’ to Call...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement