TIME: How Can the President of Peace Be Calling for the Annihilation of...
WI Gubernatorial Candidate Stands With To-Be-Deported President of Islamic Society of Milw...
CNN’s Jake Tapper White-Knights for Kaitlan Collins Again Against Historically Unpopular P...
‘You’re Welcome, America’: Newsom Signs EO Protecting AI From Being Renamed by Trump
Renee Good's Attorney Says She Was Just Driving Home When Her Drive Was...
Israel War Room Torches NBC News' Post About Plane That Apparently Decided to...
JD Vance Personally Thanks Trump As a Marine for Ending the War in...
VIDEO: Former DOJ Lawyer John Yoo Says Christa Pike Could Face a Firing...
Trump Stole the Stage at the California Gubernatorial Debate
OOF: Pretty Sure We Know Why Abdul El-Sayed TRIED Deleting THIS X Post....
Jessica Tarlov Thought Using a Trump Post to Sell Her Book Was a...
'Did the Terrorist Write This Headline?' CBS Dusts Off a Media Cliché for...
Xavier Becerra Set Himself Up Like a Bowling Pin for Steve Hilton's Debate...
'What a SICK Woman': Ana Kasparian Implies FlyDubai Attack Was a False Flag...
Adam Schiff's Election Disinformation Warning Collapses Under the Weight of All the Shamel...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement