Dairy Farmers Mourning Their Cheap Illegal Labor Just Tripled Output With Robots ......
Feeding Our Future Defendant Sentenced to One Year in Prison for Part in...
Konnichiwa, Japan! Americans and Japanese Bond on X Over BBQ'd Meats and Mutual...
Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Unruly Theater Kids: Statue of Liberty...
Democrat Says It Would be UNFAIR to Take HIS Salary During the Government...
Take Your Meds: Sam Stein and NYT Share 'An Architectural Look' at the...
David Axelrod's Snotty Dig at Trump's Ballroom Hits Obama RIGHT in His ......
No More Kids for the Peasants: Sunny Hostin on The View Calls Childbearing...
NYC Mayor Mamdani Calls Wife 'Private' While Taxpayers Fund Her Security — Her...
Report About Largest Population Decline in the US Earns Newsom and Bass a...
FEAR: Check Out Eric Swalwell's Face When He Realizes WHOSE Hand He's Shaking...
Trump Pays TSA Agents! Dems Pissed! 'No Kings' Rallies Fail! Iran Over In...
So Much THIS! Mike Rowe Politely FLUSHES Elitist Hollywood Snob Jimmy Kimmel and...
Let's Check on National Test Scores While AFT President Randi Weingarten Screeches About...
Daniel Goldman Tries Picking a Fight With Elon Musk Over Voter ID and...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement