Here's Another Gem of an Illegal Biden Let Into the U.S. (Bill Melugin...
Fairfax County Atty.'s Pledge to Prosecute Those Who Threaten Public Safety Is a...
Gavin Newsom Helpfully Just Made It More Clear Than Ever That He's Insane...
Joe Scarborough Blew His Big Interview With Abdul El-Sayed
You KNOW It's Getting Bad for El-Sayed When Even Morning Joe Is Calling...
NRSC Video Montage ENDS Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Twitch...
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham Taking Abdul El-Sayed APART for Ignorant Comment on...
Oh, HONEY: Lefty Phone Banker Roasted for Whining That Voters Keep Asking Her...
'Now We Know Why'! Scott Jennings Flashes Back to What Happened on CNN...
This Is RICH: Chuck Schumer’s PAC Drops Some SERIOUS Coin on Supposed Anti-Big-Money...
Trump's Second Term Will Never Survive the Latest Cringe-Worthy Celebrity 'Resistance' Vid...
Climate Exchange: AI Doomsayers Sound Just Like Climate Doomsayers
Hasan Holiday: Neera Tanden Wants Piker to Take a Hike but Appears Keen...
Naked Partisanship: Jen Psaki’s Fake Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney’s Nude Betting Ad Gets...
Zoinks!: Courtroom Sketch of Terror Suspect Has X Talking ‘Scooby Snacks’ and Making...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement