Sunny Imposition: The View’s Hostin Invents Convenient Reason to Never Stop Lecturing Us...
Disorderly Dems: TN GOP Removes Disruptive Justin Pearson and Others From Their House...
NBC Tries to Sell New Pandemic Panic But No One Is Buying
Check Out These Flashback Reports From Obama's Reflecting Pool Renovation
NBC News: 18-Year-Old US Citizen Dies of Cancer With His Parents by His...
Piers Morgan Zings the Diversity of the Late-Night Boys' Club
WaPo: Most Trump Deportees Are Men, Leaving Women to Raise Families Alone
Champagne Commies Courtside: Hypocrites Drop Thousands on Lakers Seats While Preaching Aga...
John Fetterman Urges People to Get Over Their TDS Over the Reflecting Pool...
Democrats' Mask Off: Marc Elias Pushes to Abolish Virginia Gov't Altogether Because Dems...
Was Nicholas Kristof's Dog-Rape Opinion Piece Meant to Head Off This Brutal New...
Kristof Screws the Pooch: Supposed Medical Journals Backfire Spectacularly
Ro Khanna: SC, Where First Shot of Civil War Was Fired, Denies Blacks...
Someone Call a Priest Because Kash Patel Just BURIED Chris Van Hollen Over...
Pro-Hamas Marchers Wave Hezbollah Flag Outside Brooklyn Synagogue; Harmeet Dhillion Is on...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement