Graham Platner Superfan Bernie Sanders Recommends He Step Aside in Tear-Stained Post
'Florida Dodged a Bullet': Ex-Gov Dem Nominee Andrew Gillum Busted Last Night in...
Graham Platner's World Just Came Crashing Down
'Impressed by His Political Charisma' — Michelle Goldberg, Just Before Platner's Rape Alle...
The Bulwark's Sarah Longwell Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Democrats and...
He DELETED It! LOL! Stephen King Tries Backpedaling on Graham Platner Support but...
LOL! Scott Jennings Bringing Up Past Debate to EMBARRASS Neera Tanden Because He...
HA! Mike Lee Has ALL THE FUN Tormenting Ruben Gallego Over Platner Endorsement...
Midtown Manhattan Skyscraper on Verge of Collapse --> Huge Emergency Response, Evacuations...
Clickbait RAG The Daily Beast Runs Sleazy Hit Piece Claiming Brandon Gill Hid...
Wait ... WUT?! Graham Platner Campaign Is Hiring and the Role They're Hiring...
Lyndsey Fifield Goes STRAIGHT-FIRE on NYT: Couldn't Corroborate Platner Abuse Claims? BS!...
Aww, Commies Can't DEAL! Hasan Piker FLIPS OUT in ALL-CAPS on Scott Jennings...
Dems Have a Violent MAN Problem: Looks Like Maine Dems 1st Choice to...
Well, WHAT Do You Know?! Biden Really DID Hose Housing ... By Letting...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos