Podcaster Jennifer Welch: Dems Schumer and Jeffries Are Acting Like Trump’s ‘Fascist Colla...
A Lesson In Deflection: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Boy’s Question on ‘Take Your...
Pallywood Employing Child Actors for Its Latest Propaganda Campaign
NBC Tells DOGE Layoff Sob Stories on Behalf of the DNC
Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO Tasked With Importing HIV-Positive Migrants
NYC Mayor Mamdani Earns Sarcastic Applause After Billionaire 'Name and Shame' Effort Start...
High-Six-Figure USAID Layoffs Meet Public Eye-Roll: 'You Made Bank Off Our Taxes'
Investigative Reporter Self-Owns While Arguing Conservatives Are Lying About the SPLC Indi...
Writer Brags About Stealing from Whole Foods with Hasan Piker — Turns Out...
Hypocrite Jim Acosta Leaves Replies On, Does ‘So Many Triggered People’ Meme
Tucker Carlson Asks How American Evangelicals Can 'Support' IDF Soldier Vandalizing Jesus...
Shipwrecked Crew Drops Truth Bomb: Court Killed Virginia Amendment Because Dems Illegally...
NYT Podcast Lets Hasan Piker Casually Endorse Stealing Cars and Louvre Heists: 'Pro-Piracy...
AL Gubernatorial Candidate Who’s Taken on the Klan Misrepresents SPLC Indictments
NPR Media Guy Claims FBI Investigated Journalist Whose Work Reflected Poorly on FBI...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement

TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA