No Interviews, No Free Palestine Drama: Studios Keep Mark Ruffalo Quiet for Spider-Man...
PolitiFact's Defense of WI Dem Candidate for Gov Is Why So Many 'Fact-Checkers'...
Is That Really Their Only Concern? MSNOW Frets Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Could Become...
OUCH! Bernie Moreno Straight-Up NUKED Fauci AND His 'Dirtbag Attorney'
DNC Woes Continue As New Report Reveals They Were Scammed by Someone Pretending...
Senator Hawley Hilariously Forces Fauci to Plead the Fifth on His Tie Color...
WNBA’s Stef Dolson Slaps on Pro-Trans Tank Top to Own the Cons… Her...
Fauci Wanted to Plead the Fifth but Have His Lawyer Do the Talking...
Rand Paul Mocks Fauci's Cowardly Invocation of the Fifth Amendment During Senate Hearing
Frenzy on X After Fauci Refuses to Answer Congress: Users Call Him Coward...
Rand Paul Makes a GREAT Case for Fauci's Pardon Being Put to the...
One Guy Shows Up to Protest the Tate Brothers’ Detention … Discovers He’s...
Kerry Kennedy Defends Dr. Fauci's Right to Privacy (There's Just One Problem)
Dem Senator Who Was Feeling Good About Graham Platner Is Now Feeling Good...
Shackles Shakedown: Mayor Zohran Mamdani Is Open to Making New Yorkers Pay Slave...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement