More Than 170 Jewish Entertainment Figures Defend Mark Ruffalo, Group of 1,000 Do...
Democratic Socialist Hypocrisy Exposed Yet Again
Witness in ‘Have My Baby in Miami’ Birth Tourism Scam Pleads the Fifth...
What the Socialists Get Wrong About the Affordability Problem Is... EVERYTHING
USPS Whistleblower Says Trump Officials Were Defying Court Order With ‘Rushed, Secretive’...
Abdul El-Sayed Explains ‘The Point’ He Has Been Making About Usha Vance to...
Chief Justice John Roberts Argues That Those Suffering 'Aesthetic Injury' Have Standing to...
AOC Got the Memo to Dismiss Campaign Surrogate Hasan Piker As Just a...
Oliver Darcy Puts Bari Weiss at the Center of CBS News' Abdul El-Sayed...
Spencer Pratt Puts Climate Cultist on BLAST in Heated Exchange Over California Wildfires
Hanging Out?: El-Sayed Equates Campaigning With Piker to Doing One-Off Interview With Jess...
He's Just SO BAD at This! VA AG Jay 'Two Bullets' Jones Loses...
THAR SHE BLOWS! Rashida Tlaib Goes Straight ARGLE BARGLE RAR Screeching About... We're...
American Heroes of 9/11: Father Mychal Judge
Hakeem Jeffries Tried Deflecting From How AWFUL the DSA Is by Whining About...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement