@seanmdav @washingtonpost Intellectual dishonesty required
— KEK (@_uptoolate_) August 16, 2016
Who says pimping baby murder can’t be glamorous? Cecile Richards — with some help from the Washington Post — is out to prove the naysayers wrong:
https://twitter.com/iptuttle/status/765658425917337600
That’s right:
Style? pic.twitter.com/sBiBhoHJLf
— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) August 16, 2016
Let’s read more about Cecile Richards’ stylish self, shall we?
She is, as always, immaculately put together, her tall frame draped in a merlot-colored sheath and matching cardigan, gold earrings twinkling beneath her short, white-blond hair. Her alto voice conveys the subtlest hint of a Texas twang, and more than a hint of sarcasm.
…
In person, the 59-year-old Richards exudes both a warm authenticity and a subtle impenetrability; there’s the sense that she means everything she says, but she isn’t saying everything. Her public persona is almost preternaturally controlled; like the savviest politicians, she’s supremely polished, perpetually on-message and surrounded by a highly protective media operation that carefully controls reporters’ access and circles the wagons when uncomfortable situations arise.
By all means, read on for a full, fawning bio of the Pro-Abortion Queen. If you can stomach it, that is.
https://twitter.com/ErickaAndersen/status/765658661205180422
And looking fabulous is what matters, right?
GP Yes, she's responsible for slaughtering thousands of human lives each year, but with *style,* so it's OK, see? https://t.co/QTkWFaE89V
— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) August 16, 2016
Blending the topic of how stylish she is with the horror of abortion is disgusting.
— SheilaW (@SheLa9876) August 16, 2016
"abortion movement" bolder than ever? Is this something to be proud of???
— Cult 45 (@theomark) August 16, 2016
She makes $600k a year off the deaths of innocent babies #CecileIsNoSaint
— micaiah bilger (@micaiah157) August 16, 2016
@iptuttle @PPact @CaitJGibson And proud of it. I can't comprehend anyone supporting sucking out baby's brains.
— Eddie Robbins (@eddierobbins) August 16, 2016
https://twitter.com/gtuttle/status/765612213914767360
Selling dead baby parts is pretty bold. And objectively evil.
— Andy Shanks (@andysnark) August 16, 2016
And speaking of evil:
https://twitter.com/iptuttle/status/765660510196994052
Nauseating. Absolutely nauseating.
@NRO @washingtonpost The uncrushed, unvacuumed face.
— John Tadian (@Tadianj) August 16, 2016
https://twitter.com/DaJSch/status/765662995666104320
https://twitter.com/molratty/status/765662525648048128
They couldn’t show the true face of abortion. It just wouldn’t be stylish, you know?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member