Once again, Greg Gutfeld nails it:
the first sentence tells you everything you ever need to know about the New York Times. http://t.co/9jK6C0gX2v
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) January 8, 2015
It certainly does:
We’ve come to expect drivel from The New York Times, but that doesn’t make it any easier to stomach.
@greggutfeld @AdamBaldwin They are a joke.
— Tim Ballisty (@IrishEagle) January 8, 2015
@greggutfeld Absolutely nauseating
— Beth (@ewbeasley) January 8, 2015
@greggutfeld @allahpundit Holy fuck. I am speechless.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) January 8, 2015
@greggutfeld What putrid rubbish.
— Fallor Ergo Sum (@SlagOffTwits) January 8, 2015
Pure garbage.
Eventually all coverage of terror attacks will be framed in terms of their backlash potential https://t.co/xrL2KuZyOn
— Allahpundit (@allahpundit) January 8, 2015
@greggutfeld People have been joking that Muslims would be portrayed as the victims. The New York Times preempts parody.
— Anthony Bialy (@AnthonyBialy) January 8, 2015
Parting food for thought:
@greggutfeld Wonder if the NYT would feel the same if 12 of their own were splattered all over a conference room. @allahpundit @gabrielmalor
— CatsPolitics (@CatsPolitics) January 8, 2015
***
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member