NYT gets busted trying to bury Michael Reinoehl's Antifa affiliation while sliming Portland murder victim Aaron Danielson as 'far-right' [screenshots]; UPDATED

Michael Reinoehl, the suspect in the murder of Trump supporter Aaron Danielson in Portland, was killed by law enforcement yesterday, reportedly in the course of officers attempting to arrest him.

Naturally, the New York Times covered it.

With a pillow, as Iowahawk would say:

Change in Headline pic.twitter.com/v8wiCT9YHQ

— Editing TheGrayLady (@nyt_diff) September 4, 2020

Change in Abstract pic.twitter.com/z1Z5qbVgEj

— Editing TheGrayLady (@nyt_diff) September 4, 2020

Change in Abstract pic.twitter.com/vbEjK9iIRo

— Editing TheGrayLady (@nyt_diff) September 4, 2020

Amazing.

The New York Times just scrubbed the accurate description of the far-left extremist being "an antifa supporter" from their report but made sure to continue smearing the victim as being "far-right" pic.twitter.com/krGccMNhVY

— Jacob Delargy (@J_Delargy) September 4, 2020

You almost have to admire their shamelessness at this point.

Damn, that was fast.

— Terri quite contrary (@Four_in_hand) September 4, 2020

Conveniently removed antifa … https://t.co/jNFxskf417

— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) September 4, 2020

Recommended

Expert on Grand Strategy Can't See the Rationale for Blowing Up a Bridge in Iran

Brett T.

Advertisement

I saw that too

— iowafanthroughthickandthin (@CjNascar6767) September 4, 2020

“100% Antifa”…..yea, let’s just ignore his own statements.

— Daren Sorenson (@DarenSorenson) September 4, 2020

Let’s just ignore anything that messes with our preferred narrative.

Those who control the flow of information wield power.

— Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 4, 2020

***

Update:

Oh hey:

Is the NYT is glamorizing a suspected killer? https://t.co/rR0l7m6u5Z pic.twitter.com/7N7JMtd7pR

— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) September 4, 2020

Why yes. Yes they are.