Indecision 2028: Reporter Stumps Dem Gov. Gavin Newsom With ‘Would You Be a...
UK 'Asylum-Seekers' Being Handed Booklets Teaching Them That Women Are for More Than...
Bill Kristol: It’s Perfectly Legitimate to Ask What Job Natalie Harp Is Doing...
Diminutive Commie Cut Down to Size: Scott Bessent Takes Robert Reich Down a...
Maggie Haberman Calls Trump Aide Natalie Harp a ‘Human Binkie’
Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Plan to Move FBI Out of Hoover Building
“Tails Between Their Legs: Harry and Meghan’s Shock Move Back to the UK...
Trump Administration Cuts $3 Billion in Refundable Tax Credits for Illegal Aliens
NYT Speaks With Six People to Find Out What 'Sylphlike' Natalie Harp Actually...
Moderation Operation: Is Dem Jessica Tarlov AOC’s One-Woman PR Rep? Sure Seems Like...
Abdul El-Sayed Notes That Jesus Was Considered a Radical in His Time Too
Florida Squeeze: MS NOW’s Morning Joe Crew Fawn Over Latest Democrat DSA Darling...
Daily Beast and Rosie O'Donnell Think an Iranian Assassination Plot Is Enough to...
Former NIAID Adviser Pleads Guilty to Scheme to Hide Records During the COVID...
Harmeet Dhillon Explains What Was Really on Display From CNN's Erin Burnett and...

'NOBODY is buying what you're selling': Sharyl Attkisson dismantles Wikipedia 'agenda editor' in back and forth about propaganda

Sharyl Attkisson noticed that Wikipedia has been using her retweets as proof of what she believes. As anyone who uses Twitter knows, sometimes you retweet things you may not agree with or endorse in order to have a bigger conversation.

Advertisement

We agree with Sharyl, it’s either Wiki being lazy OR looking for ways to push an agenda.

Their agenda.

Sharyl does such a good job here, pointing out that not all Wiki editors have an agenda which shows she’s working very hard not to be biased.

Unlike this Wikimedian … don’t make that face, it’s what the bio says.

Advertisement

Umm, what?

Someone’s stripes are showing.

Perhaps he or she should get out more often.

This editor would second Sharyl’s sentiments but the ‘Wikimedian’ has her blocked.

Sad.

Suuure, her followers are the nutty ones.

As if we needed more proof of the very bias that Sharyl is talking about.

Advertisement

See?

So cranky, sheesh!

And curtain.


Related:

‘WTF did I just read?!’ John Cusack’s bizarre thread explaining WHY he retweeted anti-Semitic cartoon makes things WORSE

Oh honey, STOP! AOC comes UN-GLITTER-GLUED after Repubs slam her for concentration camp comments (Liz Cheney bonus)

Such a LIAR! Planned Parenthood’s Leana Wen tries revising her org’s history in thread about abortion bans, fails GLORIOUSLY

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement