Because tweeting in all caps TOTALLY makes something true.
Gosh, the ACLU seems tense.
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL— ACLU (@ACLU) May 16, 2019
Alabama may have finally broken the ACLU. And Georgia. And Kentucky. And Ohio …
When they say ‘all’ do they mean men too because if so, we have questions (and cue the angry shrieking from haters telling us you don’t have to have a vagina to get pregnant or some other such nonsense).
ACCESS TO LIFE FOR ALL
ACCESS TO LIFE FOR ALL
ACCESS TO LIFE FOR ALL
ACCESS TO LIFE FOR ALL— Liz Mac (@TheLizMac) May 17, 2019
Well, there ya’ go.
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
— An Army of McCainites (@McCainGOP) May 16, 2019
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!
REPEATING ALL-CAPS IS NOT CONVINCING!— Francis Roy (@FrancisRoyCA) May 17, 2019
GOLDFISH DON'T BOUNCE
GOLDFISH DON'T BOUNCE
GOLDFISH DON'T BOUNCE
GOLDFISH DON'T BOUNCE
GOLDFISH DON'T BOUNCE#TheSimpsons #Duffless— RealTamsinParker (@RealTamsin) May 17, 2019
Whoa.
They don’t?
Learn something new every day.
If you'd only pasted it 10 times I'd have wondered if you were serious. But 11? On board.
— Jon Lacey (@callinon) May 17, 2019
Ha!
THIS IS NOT A COMPELLING WAY TO ARGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
THIS IS NOT A COMPELLING WAY TO ARGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
THIS IS NOT A COMPELLING WAY TO ARGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
THIS IS NOT A COMPELLING WAY TO ARGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
THIS IS NOT A COMPELLING WAY TO ARGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS— Sten (@artdyke) May 17, 2019
Right?
Now, if they’d have included a bunch of clapping emojis throughout the tweet then THAT would have made a difference.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member