'No, it just means you're an A*SHOLE': Move over NASTY women, NARAL president wants all women to be unlikable too

Sam J. | 10:19 AM on January 03, 2019

What IS it with Leftists thinking women have to be nasty or unlikable to be successful? Seriously. Remember how proud Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren were to be ‘nasty women’? Not that it did either of them any good so surely our befuddlement is no surprise.

Well NOW Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL, wants women to be unlikable.

We’re not entirely sure she knows what that words means but hey … she was rolling.

Since "unlikable" is quite obviously a synonym in politics for "strong, bright, and passionate woman," let's all be unlikable, shall we?

— ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) January 2, 2019

No, unlikable is just that, UNLIKABLE. Women can be strong, bright, and passionate without being as*holes. True story.

Suuuuure. cc: @tedcruz https://t.co/6Vd3BL0iwH

— Hook Em Holmsted (@JHolmsted) January 3, 2019

HA! We’re pretty sure Ted Cruz is a dude because of that beard HOWEVER we don’t want a bunch of moist-mouthed, angry, SJWs screeching at us for assuming ze’s gender so …

Folks on the thread had a good laugh at her tweet:

pic.twitter.com/g75fFnZUBV

— Dwarfclone (@Dwarfclone) January 3, 2019

HA HA HA HA HA.

Strong?

It takes no strength to proudly celebrate the violent slaughter of the most defenseless. https://t.co/8Suuf7jhhZ

— BonkPolitics (@BonkPolitics) January 3, 2019

I think these are the actual synonyms and they pretty much describe modern feminists: pic.twitter.com/LAFDndZkw1

— Foghorn Leghorn (@FoghornBLeghorn) January 3, 2019

Insufferable works.