Anyone notice how Senator Dianne Feinstein hasn’t said much about Kavanaugh since her ‘Hail Mary’ failed? Maybe it was the letter from Chuck Grassley asking the Ford team to send him all communications between the team and senators (especially Feinstein and Hirono) that’s spooked her into focusing on other areas …
Or maybe she’s trying desperately to save her job. Could be both.
Either way, she has a new ‘demand’ of the Trump administration.
The Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census is a cynical ploy to discourage participation. States with diverse communities like California stand to suffer the most. https://t.co/ZL114n5kVC
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) October 11, 2018
We’re demanding that the Commerce Department explain what led to the inclusion of this question on the census. We can’t allow politics to compromise the information used to determine congressional representation and federal funding. pic.twitter.com/lA3xyK0i6v
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) October 11, 2018
The inclusion of what question? You have to actually read the letter (signed by the usual suspects) demanding the Commerce Dept. explain why they’d ask if someone is a legal citizen in the census.
Seems that would be an important thing to know, right?
Call us crazy.
You demand? Lol#TermLimits
— BRHOCNY (@brh1964) October 11, 2018
What’s that old saying? Demand in one hand …
You’ll have to go back to 1950 to ask why it was included. More importantly, you should go back to 2010 and ask why it was *excluded* that time around.
— R.J Carter @ CriticalBlast ?️ (@AndrewsDisciple) October 11, 2018
So california admittedly wants to fraudulently boost its Congressional representation and federal funding by continuing to include illegal aliens in their census. Got it.
— mike tib (@tibbs_m249) October 11, 2018
Exactly. They don’t want to be responsible for the illegal immigrants they allow to live in their state.
Only U.S. citizens should be counted, genius. That's why they included that question.
— David Lewis (@DavidLewisNC) October 11, 2018
Either you are a citizen or you are not, what’s the problem, please explain your concerns.
— DRR (@DrrDenise) October 11, 2018
She’s concerned illegal immigrants won’t vote for Democrats when the mean ol’ government asks them if they’re legal citizens.
The Ford thing didn’t go over very well so she’s desperately looking for a win.
#WalkAway from Democrats. This is ALWAYS how it is when the Democrats are out of power. And when they're IN power it is non-stop LibertyCity/Watts/Ferguson #WalkAway FAR FAR away!
— elle catt (@ellecatt) October 11, 2018
Unless it benefits you…Right?
— Randy Gruber (@gruberr11) October 11, 2018
IDs are needed for fair and transparent elections. The more ambiguity you try to incorporate the less faith we have in our institution. I would have thought if you believed in fair and transparent elections you would not disagree with a simple ID
— Siren Twist (@SirenTwist) October 11, 2018
I demand for you to be investigated by the ethics committee on holding the letter from that lying Ford lady!
— J Williams (@flatbrok) October 11, 2018
Sure, the story of Dianne employing a Chinese spy for 20 years seems to have disappeared but what she did with and to Ford is here to stay.
Nice try, DiFi.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member