*SNORT* Kathy Hochul and Zohran Mamdani Literally CHASED Off After Press Conference at...
Gets WORSE: Can't IMAGINE Why Minneapolis Hilton's Leaders Didn't Want ICE Around (Check...
OOF! Drew Holden's Hilarious 'Lipstick on a Pig' Thread Roasting Media's Tim Walz...
US Capitol Police Capt. Michael Byrd (Who Shot and Killed Unarmed Ashli Babbitt)...
Full BUD-LIGHT Moment! Nick Sortor Catches Minneapolis Hilton LYING After Their Apology St...
We've Got Mamdani's Tenant Director's Old Tweets From Her Now-Deleted Account and YIKES!
Buffoon Typhoon: Scott Jennings Predicts Tim Walz’s Somali Fraud Storm Will Only Get...
We Looked! Eric Holder Says ‘Authentic Guy’ Tim Walz Was Thoroughly Vetted and...
The Curious Case of Seth Harp
Scott Jennings Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper What Trump’s ‘Negative’ Polling on Maduro’s Capture...
Outgoing Minnesota Governor Tim Walz Has Found the REAL Victim of the Somali...
Welcome to the 'We Don't Suffer Fools Lightly' Administration (The Media Is Not...
‘The Shadow Says It All, Bro!’ Man Caught in Womens' Room at Planet...
Called the COPS on Him?! Nick Sortor Did His Part to BREAK Tim...
FUME! Reporters YELL at Tim Walz As He Rushes Away After Dropping Out...

FUME: Twitter insisting Lila Rose and Live Action remove this content to lift the BAN on their ads will INFURIATE you

Remember when Jack Dorsey told everyone (even Congress!) there is no political bias on his website?

Good times.

Granted, we all knew he was full of crap when he made the claim but still. Otherwise, why would Twitter be banning ads from pro-life accounts like Lila Rose and Live Action?

Advertisement

So basically, any content that tells the truth about the horrors of abortion must be removed from their site and Twitter feeds for the ban to be lifted.

What a crock.

From USAToday:

Twitter’s reasoning for blocking Live Action’s message? In emails to us, the company has said that our content violated its sensitive advertising content policy, which prohibits “inflammatory or provocative content which is likely to evoke a strong negative reaction.”

Some examples of this supposedly offensive content include pictures of children developing in the womb and even simple ultrasound images of babies — like the ones that expectant parents hang on their refrigerator doors.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s OK for Planned Parenthood to tweet that a woman has a right to an abortion, but when I tweet and try to promote that a baby has a right to life, Twitter considers that inflammatory.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s fine for Planned Parenthood to tweet that taxpayers who don’t want to fund the nation’s largest abortion chain are “extremists,” but when I tweet that there are alternative options to Planned Parenthood, Twitter calls that an offensive violation of policy.

Advertisement

Notice they’re not censoring the harpies pushing abortion up to and including birth.

Oof.

How dare Lila and her organization tell the truth about abortion.

‘Nuff said.


Related:

Beep, beep, BEEEEP: Steven Crowder apologizes for using certain ‘words’ on his show and Vox’s Carlos Maza MELTS DOWN

‘We’re REALLY doing this’?! Dan Crenshaw NAILS House Dems for playing dishonest politics in voting to hold Barr in contempt

Somebody’s NERVOUS: Eric Holder sure seems anxious to get Trump impeached sooner than later, wonder why

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos