Republican Rep. Mark Meadows this week tweeted about newly discovered texts between former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page discussing an anti-Trump “media leak strategy”:
So, the new timeline:
4/10/17: Strzok texts Lisa Page wanting to discuss a "media leaking strategy."
4/12/17: Strzok texts Lisa Page that two articles are coming about "her namesake" (Carter Page)
4/22/17: Strzok texts Page: “article is out!" and "Well done, Page”— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) September 11, 2018
UPDATE: Today we sent an updated letter to DAG Rosenstein, including a newly discovered text + new resulting timeline:
4/12/17: Strzok texts Lisa Page two articles are coming about "her namesake" (Carter Page)
4/22/17: Strzok tells Page: “article is out!" and "Well done, Page” pic.twitter.com/9af9BvbjM3
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) September 11, 2018
Peter Strzok–the same guy who was caught on text message saying: "we'll stop Trump" (from becoming President)–wants you to believe he didn't leak damaging Trump stories to the media. He was actually the one trying to STOP the leaks.
You be the judge.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) September 12, 2018
In a story, CNN reported this about Meadows’ comments:
A House Republican, without evidence, suggests new texts show misconduct of former FBI officials https://t.co/9I10JzGRgQ pic.twitter.com/d5fAH0SqNY
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) September 12, 2018
Really? Instapundit isn’t buying that for one simple reason:
"Without evidence." Except, you know, for the texts. This is lame even for @cnnpolitics. https://t.co/RZbMxi030d
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) September 12, 2018
THIS. Is CNN.
It’s like an episode of cops. You have drugs in your pocket. No I don’t. It’s right there. I don’t see any drugs, these ain’t my pants. JFC
— The Arborist (@ongrd2) September 12, 2018
Can’t we just all agree on both sides of the aisle that .@CNN doesn’t even resemble a news organization? Disgraceful propagandandists.
— RightSideOfReagan❌ (@goshenhawk1) September 12, 2018
They're still waiting on Dem instructions on how to interpret the texts.
— VolinAsheville (@spckahuna) September 12, 2018
No doubt Dan Rather will be a guest on “Reliable Sources” to help root out the truth on this matter. *Eye roll*