How many scandals have we had since the demolition of the East Wing to make room for the new White House ballroom? That led the news cycle for a week, until the next "scandal" came along.
Rep. Jamie Raskin still has his panties in a wad over the ballroom, which Rep. Eric Swalwell says any Democratic presidential contender in 2028 must pledge to tear down. Raskin told CBS News he's introducing legislation to protect against the construction of President Donald Trump's "Marie Antoinette ballroom."
The White House is not private property. It does not belong to Donald Trump. It belongs to the people.
— Rep. Jamie Raskin (@RepRaskin) December 16, 2025
I’m introducing legislation to protect the building’s historic character against the president’s bulldozer and Marie Antoinette ballroom. https://t.co/IwLgSCS5zT
The ballroom will also belong to the people. We're sure the next Democratic president will hold state events there instead of outside under tents equipped with port-a-potties.
CBS News reports:
Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland plans to introduce legislation Tuesday that would subject White House renovations like President Trump's ballroom project to the same reviews as other federal projects. Currently, the White House is exempt from certain oversight under the National Historic Preservation Act.
…
"It's kings who treat public property as private property," Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told CBS News in a phone interview. "It's not his house; it's our house. And if there is going to be construction and renovation expansion or changes, that should go through a regular public process."
The White House asserts Mr. Trump has "full legal authority to modernize, renovate, and beautify the White House."
Recommended
What "regular public process"? The White House is right: the president has full authority to renovate the White House.
Raskin argues that "leveling the East Wing without a review process was a violation of destruction of federal property laws, though he acknowledges the president cannot be prosecuted under those statutes."
Oh, just STFU Jamie. Try not being a pathetic assclown for a few seconds for a change. pic.twitter.com/aEGZ90TGT6
— R.O.C.K. in the USSA (@ROCKInTheUSSA) December 16, 2025
Its not like he's taking the ballroom when he leaves. Unlike the Clinton's who took the furniture.
— The Disrespected Trucker (@DisrespectedThe) December 16, 2025
How about worrying about fixing the country.
— Ewe The Sheeple (@TySimone4) December 16, 2025
Stop fighting Trump on everything and start doing what we voted him to do by a landslide...
Were you this fired up about Obama's basketball court?
— Clifford D Cat 🇺🇲 (@manch_david) December 16, 2025
We wouldn't say that the basketball court preserved the building's historic character.
— Carrie's Corner (@CarrieHasAMouth) December 16, 2025
Dude , he’s building a privately funded ball room that’s long overdue . Why aren’t you focusing on make Americans lives safer and better.
— Timothy Alden (@PastorTimothyJ) December 16, 2025
Democrats love wasting time on legislation that will not pass and is irrelevant as the existing structure is already gone and the area is being prepared for the new improved East Wing with the ballroom.
— John Weerts (@HomeChef_NC) December 16, 2025
Oh, shut up. The East Wing was built hastily to cover Roosevelt's bomb shelter. It's a mess. The ballroom will be actually useful. Quit while you can!
— Dianna Deeley (@DiannaDeeley) December 16, 2025
In the interest of full disclosure, multiple Presidents have remodeled, renovated, and added on to the White House. This is about different rules for Trump, nothing more.
— Buttermaker (@BiffGizmo) December 16, 2025
We're sure Raskin meant "Marie Antoinette" as a dig, but we've seen the architectural renderings of the ballroom, and it's beautiful and elegant, much more so than the East Wing ever was.
***