Or something. No one is really sure. As Twitchy reported, David Brooks penned a confusion-inspiring piece for the New York Times which was met with much mockery.
Macklemore is great. Kelly Clarkson is not anodyne. Screw you Brooks! http://t.co/vCrk1Blfon
— Ben White (@morningmoneyben) December 17, 2013
https://twitter.com/PatrickMillsaps/status/412776425410666496
Fox News’ Brit Hume agrees and weighs in as only he can.
.@morningmoneyben That Brooks column seems to arise from a very narrow slice of earth about an even narrower slice of the populace.
— Brit Hume (@brithume) December 17, 2013
Heh. Get off his lawn and back into your Ivory Tower, Brooks!
@brithume hah. yes indeed.
— Ben White (@morningmoneyben) December 17, 2013
This Twitter user summed it up with some snark-truth:
@brithume @morningmoneyben Bret, are you saying NYT opinion columnists aren't in touch with the common man? Poppycock and balderdash!
— Patrick "Wear a Damn Mask" H. (@trogdor8768) December 17, 2013
Bingo. Try to venture out of your Beltway bubble once in a while, Brooks.
Related:
David Brooks’ confusion-provoking column has everyone tweeting
David Brooks doesn’t like conservative ‘loons’ such as Michelle Malkin
David Brooks bemoans inept campaign of ‘Thurston Howell Romney’
Sniveling Beltway Bubble Boy David Brooks concern-trolls: Romney is totally fake and stuff
Join the conversation as a VIP Member